On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
> Several people thought a view or some-non-log option would be better.
+1
> Tomas
> replied "but I need to go back in time to post diagnose a problem", and I
> saw no replies to that.
You can go back in time if you periodically collect the inf
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
>> Taking into account Noah's and Greg's "Displaying accumulated autovacuum
>> cost" patch is also sending to logs, do we all now agree that this is proper
>> way?
>
> My general impression of
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
> Taking into account Noah's and Greg's "Displaying accumulated autovacuum
> cost" patch is also sending to logs, do we all now agree that this is proper
> way?
My general impression of the thread is that nobody really wants to
reject the patch (
On 5 Září 2011, 19:17, Andy Colson wrote:
> Tomas, I cannot seem to see any of the patches you link here:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=628
>
> Looks like you need to take the < > out of the messageid.
Sorry, fixed.
Tomas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs
On 09/05/2011 12:17 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
Tomas, I cannot seem to see any of the patches you link here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=628
Looks like you need to take the < > out of the messageid.
-Andy
This patch seems to solve the problem of going back in time to
Tomas, I cannot seem to see any of the patches you link here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=628
Looks like you need to take the < > out of the messageid.
-Andy
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
