Applied. I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
comments. I assume that is the right procedure.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Applied. I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
comments. I assume that is the right procedure.
*SNIP*
+ COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS 'default administrative
connection database';\n,
Default
Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
comments. ?I assume that is the right procedure.
*SNIP*
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS 'default administrative
On 15 March 2011 15:37, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
comments. ?I assume that is the right procedure.
*SNIP*
+ ? ? ? ? ? ?
On 15 March 2011 15:51, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:37, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
comments. ?I assume
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:24:38PM +, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A preposition is something you should try not to end a sentence
with.
Something to keep in mind when someone localises Postgres for Latin
which has this
Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:51, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:37, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
template0:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, I think that the right way to approach this is to have initdb
comment *both* of those databases. I don't like that specific wording
for template0 though. Maybe
template0: unmodified copy of original template1 database
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, I think that the right way to approach this is to have initdb
comment *both* of those databases. I don't like that specific wording
for template0 though. Maybe
template0: unmodified copy of original
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On l?r, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Shouldn't the postgres database get a comment too, while we're at
it? Perhaps default database to connect to?
That's not actually true, though. Maybe it's the default database used
by administration programs? In
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
I plan to work on more system table and view comments for 9.2.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
+ COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
+COMMENT ON
Dave Page wrote:
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
+
On 12 March 2011 13:59, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment to
Thom Brown wrote:
On 12 March 2011 13:59, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line patch to add a database comment
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I like that. Perhaps unmodified template database'?
why tends to be more important than what, particularly to a
confused DBA who's trying to figure out why do they have all these
extra databases???
Perhaps...
backup
Christopher Browne wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On 3/12/11, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
attached one-line
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
template0: unmodifiable pristine empty database
template1: default template for
Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, funny guys. ?;-) ?Can someone give me the right text. ?Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. ?Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
template0: unmodifiable pristine empty database
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
template0: unmodifiable pristine empty
On lör, 2011-03-12 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Shouldn't the postgres database get a comment too, while we're at
it? Perhaps default database to connect to?
That's not actually true, though. Maybe it's the default database used
by administration programs? In practice it might be some
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The problem with Greg's wording is that it's falsifiable: it is possible
for someone to modify template0 if they're determined to mess things up.
So a description like unmodifiable is promising too much.
Eh, it's possible for
On Mar 12, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A preposition is something you should try not to end a sentence with.
Something to keep in mind when someone localises Postgres for Latin
which has this rule.
--
greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 03/12/2011 04:24 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A preposition is something you should try not to end a sentence with.
Something to keep in mind when someone localises Postgres for Latin
which has this rule.
I assume
28 matches
Mail list logo
