> Again, it's the same question. If *you* want to be the maintainer, I'll
> put it on pgfoundry. Otherwise, you're asking me to be responsible for
> the code because you don't want to throw it away.
Josh,
How about a general call for maintainers? Post it to general, hackers and
advocacy (mayb
I've already added adddepends to pgFoundry (as "Old PG Upgrade"), since
people spoke up for it. I will assign one of them as admin of the
project (not sure who yet).
How is addepends in any way "old pg upgrade"??
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5:
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 15:53, Josh Berkus wrote:
>I'll grant that tips
> > doesn't look like much more than an article stub... it should probably be
> > moved to the new techdocs rather than pgfoundry.
>
> That was what I started to do. Unfortunately, the README is
> instrucitons for some SQL
> Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
> little hollow.
I would say that:
> Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> associated with them on pgfoundr
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2006-07-11 kell 14:05, kirjutas Josh Berkus:
> Robert,
>
> > Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> > associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
> > little hollow.
>
> If you're so keen to add to the probl
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 16:33, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > I really don't see how this will actually cause you any extra effort, but
> > if you want to plug my name on there after you move it, that's fine with
> > me.
>
> I meant "maintain" it, not just leave it there to age like a bad chees
Robert,
I really don't see how this will actually cause you any extra effort, but if
you want to plug my name on there after you move it, that's fine with me.
I meant "maintain" it, not just leave it there to age like a bad cheese.
If it's going to be dead code, it can do so in the FTP /o
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 03:53:26PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >All I am saying is that it couldn't hurt to put the information out
> >there... we're not hurting for disk space and none of this stuff appears
> >inherently wrong, just outdated, but it might still prove useful for some
> >people
Robert,
No need to fly off the handle there Josh.
I was hoping that you'd take me up on it in a rash moment.
No code, or no active code development?
No code was the rule we discussed. Other stuff would be a matter for
discussion. The idea was that pgfoundry was supposed to be confined
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 14:05, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> > associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
> > little hollow.
>
> If you're so keen to add to the problem, you can have my sp
On 7/10/06, Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
userlock (Merlin)
Ok, I will update the project description and maintain it. userlock
is a great feature, and I tried contacting the original author to get
him to relicense the project but could never get a hold of him. To be
honest, the current us
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 12:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > To be honest I don't know why people are against throwing the code on
> > pgfoundry with a hefty readme saying that the code is unmaintained and
> > what it's build status is on various versions
>
> ... because we don't want to litte
Robert,
Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
little hollow.
If you're so keen to add to the problem, you can have my spot as
pgfoundry admin.
Otherwise, the rule that the pgfoundr
Robert,
To be honest I don't know why people are against throwing the code on
pgfoundry with a hefty readme saying that the code is unmaintained and what
it's build status is on various versions
... because we don't want to litter pgFoundry with dead, broken projects
which nobody uses and wh
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
To be migrated to pgFoundry:
dbmirror (need owner)
I'll volunteer for this if no one else steps forward. I'm not planning on
making any significant chances to dbmirror at this point stage but I can
look after for the pgfoundry project.
On Monday 10 July 2006 17:06, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> At the request of Dave Page, here's the semi-final list after looking at
> the code:
>
> To be killed:
> adddepends
> tips
> mSQL-interface
>
To be honest I don't know why people are against throwing the code on
pgfound
All,
At the request of Dave Page, here's the semi-final list after looking at
the code:
To be killed:
adddepends
tips
mSQL-interface
To be migrated to pgFoundry:
dbmirror (need owner)
dbase (owner?)
fulltextindex (owner?)
mac (LER)
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I was looking at migrating mSQL-interface to pgFoundry, but I'm not sure
> there's any reason to do so. It was never finished, doesn't build, and
> it's not like I run across mSQL databases in the field. Does anyone?
>
> Shall we just kill it?
>
> Also, "tips"
18 matches
Mail list logo
