On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Index: src/port/thread.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 thread.c
--- src/port/thread.c 16 Aug 2003 15:35:51
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Index: src/port/thread.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Index: src/port/thread.c
===
RCS file:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES in the first place?
The thing that has me most confused here is that the end result is the
same with or without the patch, from what I can tell ... the
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES in the first place?
The thing that has me most confused here is that the end result is the
same with or without
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
Long shot ... is there some way of
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:17:41 -0400 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES in the first
place?
The thing that has
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
Long
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
In most platforms that are like this, I think, they have
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:51:01 -0400 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
such platforms before I figure out how to
10 matches
Mail list logo