Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are > > thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other > > such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way. > > Long shot ... is there some way of writing a configure test for this? > Right now, it sounds like we're going to be hitting alot of trial-n-error > if there isn't ...
How would we test if a function is thread-safe? I can't think of a reliable way, and hence my warning that this adjusting could take a while. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
