Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)

2008-03-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
largefiles option, per filesystem. At least that was the case on SCO UnixWare (No, I no longer run it). LER regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430

Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update

2006-07-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
- gen_random_bytes() function > > I'll apply this shortly. > > To -patches, would folks prefer that I aggregate the patches into a > single CVS commit, or do a commit for each patch? > > -Neil Personal opinion, but since they are all related, one big commit seems to ma

[PATCHES] quick patch for pg_database.encoding doc

2006-06-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
this database --- 1954,1962 encoding int4 ! Character encoding for this database. The ! pg_encoding_to_char can be used to translate ! this to the encoding name used -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.

2006-05-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Greetings, > I've got a patch to be reviewed for having the stats system keep > track of the last > time a table was vacuumed or analyzed either by the user or via > AutoVacuum. > > The patch is at: > http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/pg-dev/vacuu

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Logging pg_autovacuum

2006-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: >> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:28:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> Since both vacuum and autovacuum will be cutting stats records, do >>> we want to just have the autovacuum >>> stats record have the fact

Re: [PATCHES] Reduce dependancies of postmaster (without --as-needed)

2005-11-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Nov 28 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: >> -lnsl is needed on SVR4 derivatives, like Solaris and UnixWare. it is >> the network services library. > libsocket requires libnsl: > [1] NEEDED /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 Hmmm ... but given that, is it

Re: [PATCHES] Reduce dependancies of postmaster (without --as-needed)

2005-11-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Nov 28 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > -lnsl is needed on SVR4 derivatives, like Solaris and UnixWare. it is > the network services library. > You'll needed it for ANY socket based code on these platforms. Is there any specific function symbol we can te

Re: [PATCHES] Reduce dependancies of postmaster (without --as-needed)

2005-11-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
network services library. You'll needed it for ANY socket based code on these platforms. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611

[PATCHES] Updated FAQ_SCO patch

2004-05-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
this (2004-05-14). + +You might also see Join test failures due to ordering differences, and these +are ok. + -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland,

[PATCHES] src/template/unixware syntax error

2004-05-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
ware13 May 2004 15:44:05 - 1.36 +++ unixware14 May 2004 15:36:45 - @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ if test "$GCC" != yes; then -then # The -Kno_host is for a bug in the compiler. See -hackers # discussion on 7-8/Aug/2003. cat >conftest.c <<__EOF__ -- Larry Rose

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, May 14, 2004 09:41:58 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Reply from SCO: Indeed. For "inf", "infinity", and "nan", but not "nan(digits)", the pointer is left at the trail

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 21:35:43 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Where does it leave the "ptr" pointing to? $ ./test3 ptr=8049682, points to N ptr=8049686, points to f Indeed, they found an original new way to

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 21:26:50 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I ran a quick C test: Where does it leave the "ptr" pointing to? $ cc -O -o test3 test3.c $ ./test3 num=nan errno=0 ptr=8049682, points to N num=i

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 21:14:40 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Does Unixware support NaN/Infinity at all? Yes, we support NaN's and Inf. Hmph. Apparently their strtod() has thought of some original new way to m

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 20:49:28 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: the int4/int8 have to do with NaN and Infinity i/o. Those we care about. I was hoping CVS tip would Just Work Everywhere on that point, but evidently not :-(.

[PATCHES] FAQ_SCO update for --enable-thread-safety and some other stuff

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
you use the --enable-thread-safety configure flag, you *MUST* use -Kpthread +on ALL libpq using programs. + +libpq uses pthread_* calls, which are only available with the +-Kpthread/-Kthread flag. + $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
to do with NaN and Infinity i/o. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
O_FLAGS = -G endif +CFLAGS += $(PTHREAD_CFLAGS) %.so: %.o $(CC) $(SO_FLAGS) -o $@ $< $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
hat the Makefile.port files are for? Makefile.global should never contain any "#ifdef port" junk. regards, tom lane It also appears from testing, that this does NOT fix the initdb issue. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 19:06:15 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > Really? You are configuring with --enable-thread-safety? I just > updated your template in CVS, and it is attached. However, any old CVS > should work fine. Nope, ini

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but > > > template/unixware has: > > > > > > For gcc: > > > > > > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-pthread" >

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
gt; > Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but > template/unixware has: > > For gcc: > > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-pthread" > > and for non-gcc: > > THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-K pthread" > > Larry, are these wrong? Nope, those work, and should be passed to any l

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use

2004-03-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 09:18:03 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Friday, March 19, 2004 10:15:56 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [moved to -patches because of the patch] --On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads

2004-03-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
[moved to -patches because of the patch] --On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: > I thought that once you include libpthread in libpq, that you don't > have to mention it again then you use libpq. Is your pla

[PATCHES] UnixWare Thread Patch (and test_fsync)

2004-03-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
ile,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 Makefile --- src/tools/fsync/Makefile18 Mar 2004 03:56:59 - 1.1 +++ src/tools/fsync/Makefile18 Mar 2004 21:39:26 - @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # TARGET = test_fsync XFLAGS = -CFLAGS = -g -Wall +CFLAGS = -O LIBS = $(TARGET) : test_f

Re: [PATCHES] Problem with dblink

2003-11-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
ough you ought to get Marc to change the Real Name field to show Joe Conway instead of User joe). LER > > Joe > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command &g

Re: [PATCHES] Problem with dblink

2003-11-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
strange ;-) Does Marc allow chfn to run on those boxes? If so, run it. :-) LER > > Joe > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend > > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 04:23:35 -0500 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > You can reduce the example down to > >extern char *strcpy(char *, const char *); > >static void f(char *p, int n){ &

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, November 03, 2003 23:24:19 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > I'll try and write the patch as you suggest. Here's a patch as you suggested: Isn't there a way to write a test that actually triggers the bug we'r

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, November 03, 2003 23:24:19 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: > I'll try and write the patch as you suggest. Here's a patch as you suggested: Isn't there a way to write a test that actually triggers the bug we'

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 17:23:59 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Sunday, November 02, 2003 18:17:26 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: +# version check for the 7.1.3UP3 compiler (versio

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 18:17:26 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: +# version check for the 7.1.3UP3 compiler (version 401200310): +cat >conftest.c <<__EOF__ +int main(int argc, char **argv) +#if __SCO_VERSION__ &

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 15:29:37 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll try and write the patch as you suggest. Here's a patch as you suggested: Index: src/template/unixware === RCS file: /

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 23:05:21 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: The problem is MOST people will **NOT** be able to get the fixed compiler as it's on the Upgrade Pack path (PAY FOR), and **NOT** the Maintenance Pack path (Free). W

Re: [PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 02, 2003 22:26:40 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: Since peter objects to my methods, what is an ACCEPTABLE way to detect the 7.1.3UP3 compiler? One POSSIBLE way to do this properly is to write a test that 1) Uses $CC, $

[PATCHES] UW 713UP3 patch

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
Since peter objects to my methods, what is an ACCEPTABLE way to detect the 7.1.3UP3 compiler? I'd like to get this fixed for RC1. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Sp

Re: [PATCHES] UnixWare UP3 compiler detection patch

2003-10-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, November 01, 2003 00:17:46 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: I put the following patch to detect the 7.1.3 UP3 compiler. If there are no SERIOUS objections, please apply: This patch breaks about all the rules for robust autoconf tes

[PATCHES] UnixWare UP3 compiler detection patch

2003-10-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
CFLAGS="-O -Kinline,no_host" + fi + rm testcompver testcompver.c THREAD_CPPFLAGS="-K pthread" fi - THREAD_SUPPORT=yes NEED_REENTRANT_FUNCS=no # verified 7.1.3 2003-09-03 THREAD_CPPFLAGS="$THREAD_CPPFLAGS -D_REENTRANT" -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all= =20 care). Unfixably? Or just a small oversight? I'm actu

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:00:43 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Please, only the first two. Make the Unixware template add __i386__. Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols. that's reasonab

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO. Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add* an implicit #define of _

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
pace symbols. that's reasonable. At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-) (announced at SCOForum). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.htm

Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
v7.4, with the "cleanup patch" being applied right away after v7.4? Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all care). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PATCHES] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 14:19:00 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/libpq' cc

[PATCHES] UnixWare patches placed on my www site

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
this will allow us to NOT have to muck with LD_LIBRARY_PATH nor symlinks out of /usr/lib/ These are against today's CVS. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Driv

[PATCHES] unixware having FULL pathnames in DT_SONAME

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
)/$(soname) endif ifeq ($(PORTNAME), cygwin) -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 unixware.shlib.patch Description: Binary data

[PATCHES] Preliminary UnixWare threads stuff

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
x27; + CFLAGS='-O -K inline -DHAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R' + THREAD_CFLAGS="-D_REENTRANT -K pthread -DHAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R" + NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes fi + This is BEFORE Bruce's rename of threads.c to thread.c -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED UnixWare Threads Patch.

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 08, 2003 18:56:45 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here is the updated UnixWare threads patch. I need some help to set the HAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R define from configure, but this will suffice for now. This also includes my recommendation for the Compil

[PATCHES] UPDATED UnixWare Threads Patch.

2003-08-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
compiler is out, we can do a version check. + CFLAGS='-O -Kinline,no_host -DHAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R' + THREAD_CFLAGS="-D_REENTRANT -K pthread -DHAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R" + NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes fi -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone:

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
r private copy their path. LER ] cheers andrew Larry wrote --On Friday, July 25, 2003 11:58:18 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: I disagree STRONGLY with what you are saying here. What harm does it do to add the ABILITY for a port to use a ABSOLUTE DT

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, July 25, 2003 11:58:18 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: I disagree STRONGLY with what you are saying here. What harm does it do to add the ABILITY for a port to use a ABSOLUTE DT_SONAME? We can discuss adding the ability, but I

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, July 25, 2003 09:37:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: Universal Practice does NOT equal Security and Usability. Please consider what Kean is saying here. What Kean is saying is that your system is insecure if you have a setuid exec

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2] (fwd)

2003-07-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
Date: Thursday, July 24, 2003 04:33:12 -0700 From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2] These concerns might have s

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:20:34 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: Why do this at all? Security. Having shared libraries without full SONAME's is a big security risk. There have been any number of huge explots based around this. Poin

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch [openserver followup]

2003-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Forwarded Message Date: Saturday, July 19, 2003 16:10:36 -0700 From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: PG Patch I'm trying to get a discussion going, as Bruce wants to do it right for ALL platf

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd)

2003-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: PG Patch Larry Rosenman wrote: BTW, you mentioned gAPI, what's the un-TLA'ing of that, and a WWW ref? gABI - General Application Binary Interface. http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi Oh and this is

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
2nd followup from Kean. LER Forwarded Message Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 23:43:55 -0700 From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: PG Patch Larry Rosenman wrote: I got a question from the PG Core Team (B

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [OpenServer followup #1]

2003-07-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
ROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: PG Patch Larry Rosenman wrote: I got a question from the PG Core Team (Bruce Momjian) about the rpathdir portion of your patch. Why can't it use libdir? Or can we wrap it in .if (port,=,sco) type stuff? There's con

Re: [PATCHES] PERL (fwd)

2003-07-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
I was dealing with SCO on PG issues, and they supplied the following patch against 7.3.3 for SCO OSR5. Can it be massaged for 7.4? LER Forwarded Message Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 13:09:40 -0700 From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman &

[PATCHES] Interval Patch

2003-06-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
else { sprintf(cp, ":%02d", abs(tm->tm_sec)); cp += strlen(cp); -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [PATCHES] Thread configure flag

2003-06-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
nixWare? That throws another mix into it. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)-