On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> > Is there a benefit to having the WAL and logs on the separate
> > RAID 1? Or is just having them be part of the larger RAID 1+0
> > just as good?
>
> I once accidentally left the pg_xlog directory on the 40-spind
Dave Johansen wrote:
> Is there a benefit to having the WAL and logs on the separate
> RAID 1? Or is just having them be part of the larger RAID 1+0
> just as good?
I once accidentally left the pg_xlog directory on the 40-spindle
RAID with most of the data instead of moving it. Results with
gra
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 04:06 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> Right now, we're running a RAID 1 for pg_clog, pg_log and pg_xlog and
>> then a RAID 1+0 with 12 disks for the data. Would there be any benefit
>> to running a separate RAID 1+0 with a tablespa
On 12/19/2013 04:06 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
Right now, we're running a RAID 1 for pg_clog, pg_log and pg_xlog and
then a RAID 1+0 with 12 disks for the data. Would there be any benefit
to running a separate RAID 1+0 with a tablespace for the indexes?
Not really. PostgreSQL doesn't currently s
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 11:00 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> When I run pgbench in "SELECT only" after doing "-i -s 2000" I get what
>> appears to be good performance (60k-70k tps) but if I initialize a new
>> database with "-i -s 4000" the tps drops to
On 12/19/2013 11:00 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
When I run pgbench in "SELECT only" after doing "-i -s 2000" I get what
appears to be good performance (60k-70k tps) but if I initialize a new
database with "-i -s 4000" the tps drops to 4k-7k. Is this order of
magnitude drop expected? Or is there som
I'm working on setting up a large database (or at least what I consider to
be a large one with several tables having 10-20 million records inserted
per day), and I've been using pgbench to verify that the hardware and
database are configured in an optimal manner.
When I run pgbench in "SELECT only