Thomas Holmgren wrote:
>
> Hello everyone! :)
>
> This little problem is bothering me a lot! It seems that PostgreSQL 7.0
> uses different semantics than Oracle when evaluting SQL?!
Not that much, but ...
> [...]
>
> I have defined two views, viewA and viewB. They are defined as follow:
>
>
Bernie Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbie to SQL. Could someone please explain why do I need a
> contraint, and how do I use it in SQL? An example is needed. Thanks
Constraints are used to have the database engine ensure the
integrity of the data. It'l like teaching the database it
Kyle Bateman wrote:
> Is it possible to defer the check on a primary key constraint (or a
> check constraint, for that matter). Here is an example that shows why
> it would be nice to be able to do so. We have a real-life scenario that
> is similar (but much more complex).
Not yet. Only
Nikolaj Lundsgaard wrote:
> Is there anywhere I can find some benchmark test for postgres. The reason is that I
>want to use it for a site that could have several simultanous users querying the
>database and I want to be sure that it is stable (and fast) enough to handle that
>kind of (ab)use.
Michael Fork wrote:
> CREATE INDEX idx_radacct_1 ON radacct (username,acctstatustype,tstamp);
> CREATE INDEX idx_radacct_2 ON radacct (username,acctstatustype);
> CREATE INDEX idx_radacct_3 ON radacct (username,tstamp);
> CREATE INDEX idx_radacct_4 ON radacct (acctstatustype,tstamp);
> CREATE INDE
Niall Smart wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Does anyone know if this is on the radar for 7.1?
Yes, it is not.
Jan
--
#==#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.
GANESH KUMAR wrote:
>
> sir ,
>
> i am working 6.5.2 postgresql
> in creation foregein key in table
>
> syntax i am writing is
> 1)create table gk
> (sno int primary key);
>
> 2)create table kk
> (sno int references gk,
> sname varchar(2));
> i am getting message like this foregein key is not
Saltsgaver, Scott wrote:
> Which procedural language is best for writing PostgreSQL functions:
> 'PL/pgSQL', 'PL/perl', or 'PL/Tcl'?
>
> I know that I can't do table creates in 'PL/pgSQL'?
>
> Is there an obvious choice as far speed and size?
PL/Tcl has the advantage that it can do the table
Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > One thing to keep in mind is that the LZ algorithm you're
> > thinking of must be distributable under the terms of the BSD
> > license. If it's copyrighted or patented by any third party
Brett W. McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John wrote:
>
> > I would like to get the id's where the customer has purchased an item of a
> > specific type.
> >
> > Problem A: most people order more than one item at a time.
> > So the 'items' field is a colon delimitted text field containing t
Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Wieck) writes:
> >> As long as you brought it up: how sure are you that the method you've
> >> used is not subject to any patents?
>
> > Now that you ask for it: I'm not sure. Could be.
>
> >> If you
Antti Linno wrote:
> Is there any possibility to unlock tables after they've been locked? The
> manual part of lock was fuzzy, so I ask from experts instead. MySQL
> uses lock and unlock.
Yes, COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
The transactional concept implies that you hold each lock you
accquired si
omid omoomi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'll be glad if you describe more details about the problem. Is it a kind of
> statistical analysis or what?
> Omid Omoomi
Sorry to respond that slow.
It's something, Ulf Mehlig described to me a couple of months
ago. The median is the value, below and
Markus Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any disadvantages of using OID as the primary key for any
> table?
> What about referencing external tuples using their OIDs?
>
> e. g.:
> CREATE TABLE thistable
> ...
> field NUMERIC REFERENCES OtherTable (oid)
>
> Which data type should I use to reference
Jon Lapham wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> >
> > It's a known problem in the foreign key code. The reason is that
> > the fk triggers use SELECT FOR UPDATE to select the matching
> > rows that it is checking and the reason for using FOR UPDATE is
> > to l
Markus Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of my users wants to create functions using the C language, but pgs
> says "no permission".
>
> How can I permit the user to do this, while avoiding to give him root
> access rights?
Assuming with "root" access you mean "DB-superuser" rights.
No way!
Ange Michel POZZO wrote:
> I repost my message because it seems that my previous post don't go on
>
> i use [PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc 2.95.2]
> rpm version of Linux Mandrake 7.02
>
That's definitely the problem. I cannot recreate it with
current CVS sour
Kyle wrote:
> Jan wrote:
> > Beginning with Tcl 8.0, dual ported objects got used to deal
> >with values. These have (amongst performance issues) alot of
> >benefits. Changing all the call interfaces would make it
> >impossible to use PL/Tcl with a pre 8.0 Tcl installation
Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
>Can anybody tell me, how I can insert text data larger then 20k in database
> wihtout using large objects?
>
7.1 will be able to hold megabytes in the "text" data type.
It's already in the CURRENT sources and works well.
Jan
--
#===
Tom Lane wrote:
> "=?iso-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgTuZzcw==?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I wish to make rule looking something like this:
> > create rule newsrule as
> > on insert to news do
> > if new.publishtime is not null insert into news_unpublished
> > values(new.id);
>
> > I.e. "On an in
Poul L. Christiansen wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Poul L. Christiansen wrote:
> > > I've just split the text up (in 8 pieces), so it fits into 8K rows. But thats
> > > only a viable solution if your text is less than a couple of 100K's.
> > >
Poul L. Christiansen wrote:
> I've just split the text up (in 8 pieces), so it fits into 8K rows. But thats
> only a viable solution if your text is less than a couple of 100K's.
>
> You could try to be a daredevil and use the Toast code, even if it's beta. But
> I don't know how far the Toast pro
Stephan Szabo wrote:
> Wierd, I've not seen that behavior really, although I've never
> done time sensitive stuff. It might be the time before the
> shared cache updates? Not sure really. If you do the rule
> inline with your inserts (rather than a second transaction)
> does it still wait?
hlefebvre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
> do that ?
You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. The
problem is nested deeper and requires the planned querytree
redesign to get solved.
Before you ask: T
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > hlefebvre wrote:
> >> I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
> >> do that ?
>
> > You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. T
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > Hmm,Andreas's original function seems to contain other statements.
> > If the function contains DML statements for the table Temp_Num_Table,
> > it wouldn't work properly. i.e 1st call would work but 2nd call woudn't.
> That's
Craig May wrote:
> I've renamed the file to "pg_hba.conf". It's owner and groug are now postgres.
> The file is located in /usr/lib/pgsql/. I'm still receiving the same error.
Network setup? Contents of pg_hba.conf? How should someone
tell you what's wrong with the information you
Normunds wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> how can I write function which takes text from one field, replaces
> some characters and puts it in other field? I have array with old and
> new values.
>
> For example:
> old array = {'r', 'Z', 'o'}
> new array = {'s', 'm', 't'}
> old field value = 'Zorro'
> new fiel
Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> Try this for both FK tables:
>
> create table tmp2(idx2 int4, col2 int4, constraint
> tmpcon2 foreign key(col2) references tmp1(idx) INITIALLY DEFERRED);
>
> This will defer constraint checks till transaction commit...
> though constraint triggers should use SnapshotDirty i
KuroiNeko wrote:
> > I wonder if there couldn't borrowed some code from Interbase which has
> > full featured stored procedures - at least it was told to me that it has
> > ...
>
> Well, I have some hands-on experience with IB, don't know whether this is
> perfectly relevant, but here goes
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Bruce, Jan, etc.:
>
> [...]
>
> The rest of these requests apply to 7.2:
>
> 2. Stored Procedure functionality, i.e. outputting a full recordset from
> a function (or new structure, if functions are hard to adapt) based on
> the last SELECT statement passed to the functio
Basilis Kladis wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-7 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I am ussing Postgresql v. 6.3 in a RedHat Linux system. I try to create a
> rule to log the deletes on table 'filter' ussing the following:
First of all, the rule system up to version 6.3 is known to
be bro
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joel Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > create rule dev_ins as on update to dev_col_comments where
> > old.description isnull do instead insert into pg_description ( objoid,
> > description) values (old.att_oid, new.description);
>
> > create rule dev_upd as on update to de
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hm. Perhaps the "cannot update view" test is too strict --- it's not
> >> bright enough to realize that the two rules together cover all cases,
> >> so it com
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This worked great until I put a real big file in (about 5M). Then, when
> > I tried to fetch the file, it seemed really slow (about 60 seconds). I
> > tried reassembling the file in the frontend instead and my time dropped
> > to about 6 sec
Kyle wrote:
> I'm using 7.0.1 with a TCL frontend.
>
> I have a schema that splits large files into tuple-sized bites and
> stores them in a table. This was done before TOAST in order to store
> large files.
>
> I have a backend TCL function that re-assembles the file like this:
>
> -- Fetch the
Peeter Smitt wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to make updateable view useing rules.
>
> CREATE RULE update_rule AS ON UPDATE TO table DO INSTEAD
> SELECT fun1(new);
>
> Thing is that backend gives this error.
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near ")"
>
> What i'm doing wrong? Are there any other
Najm Hashmi wrote:
> Hi All,
> As it is known that any funtion, written in pl/pgsql, can only
> retrun one tuple. I am just wondering it were true as well for function
> written in C language. I need to write few function that will retrun
> mulitiple rows satsifying a certain set of conditi
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Oh, yes, one more:
>
> 4. If I pass a NULL to any of the parameters of a PL/PGSQL
> function, any (other) VARCHAR parameters are set to NULL as
> well.
Fixed in 7.1. Impossible to fix in 7.0.x or earlier due to
missing capabilities of the function manage
) if the correct number of rows has been
hit.
> Anybody (Jan?) who can shed some light on the above will
> receive my enthusiastic gratitude in ASCII text.
Some sql examples would allways help.
> P.P.S. My most heartfelt gratitude to Jan Wieck for writing
> some dec
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've heard lots of people want to increase BLCKSZ, but you're the first
> > one who ever wanted to reduce it. You sure you want to do this? It's
> > going to make the maximum row length uncomfortably short.
>
> And it may even not work, as some
Forest Wilkinson wrote:
> I have a database in which five separate tables may (or may not) reference
> any given row in a table of postal addresses. I am using the primary /
> foreign key support in postgres 7 to represent these references.
>
> My problem is that, any time a reference is removed
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Forest Wilkinson wrote:
> > I have a database in which five separate tables may (or may not) reference
> > any given row in a table of postal addresses. I am using the primary /
> > foreign key support in postgres 7 to represent these references.
>
Brett Schwarz wrote:
> If I have a rule, is the rule inside a tranaction along with the table that
> it references. For example, if I have a rule that deletes an entry from
> table B, whenever an entry in table A gets deleted, then is the delete for
> table A and table B wrapped inside the same tr
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ERROR: Cannot update a view without an appropriate rule.
>
> 7.1 insists that you provide an *unconditional* DO INSTEAD rule
> for a view. What do you think was happening on your old database
> when the "where old.status = 'appr'" clause was
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If someone happens to know the primary key of a record they should not be
> > able to access, and they try to update it, I would like the backend to
> > ignore the query (or better yet, raise an exception but I haven't figured
> > out how to d
Kyle wrote:
> The only complication is
> that there are a class of records which the user should be able to view, but not
> modify. For example,
> the employee can create and modify working records as long as the only
> modification to their status
> is to move them on to "open status" (creating
Kyle wrote:
> The only complication is
> that there are a class of records which the user should be able to view, but not
> modify. For example,
> the employee can create and modify working records as long as the only
> modification to their status
> is to move them on to "open status" (creating
Olivier PRENANT wrote:
> set nomail
ERROR: permission denied
Jan
--
#==#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#=
Ken Corey wrote:
> Wow! Answering emails on a Sunday? Someone should be giving you an award or
> something.
>
> On Sunday 04 February 2001 8:13 pm, you wrote:
> > Ken Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > When the select at the bottom of this email is executed, I'm getting the
> > > message:
>
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom et al.
>
> Discovered this quirk in foriegn keys:
>
> In the preliminary version of a database, I added foriegn
> key constraints to a number of tables, linking them to a
> column in a shared reference table (status.status) that was
> only one-half of a composite primary k
Tom Lane wrote:
> I have looked a little bit at what it'd take to make SELECT INTO inside
> an EXECUTE work the same as it does in plain plpgsql --- that is, the
> INTO should reference plpgsql variables, not a destination table.
> It looks to me like this is possible but would require some nontri
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > CREATE FUNCTION table_count(varchar) RETURNS integer AS '
> > DECLARE
> > SQL varchar;
> > RES integer;
> > BEGIN
> > SQL = ''SELECT * INTO temp1 FROM '' || $1;
> > EXECUTE SQL;
> > SELECT count(*) INTO RES FROM temp1;
> > RETU
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Jan, Michael,
>
> > While I have not looked closely, I seem to recall that plpgsql handles
> > INTO by stripping that clause out of the statement before it's passed to
> > the SQL engine. Evidently that's not happening in the EXECUTE case.
> >
> > Jan, do you agree this
Dave Wedwick wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a table with an int4 field called inserttime. Regardless of what
> the user enters in this field, I want a trigger to put now() into it.
>
> What's the syntax for the trigger?
Sample:
CREATE TABLE t1 (
id serial PRIMARY KEY,
Jie Liang wrote:
> e.g.
> Try:
>
> CREATE TABLE emp (
> id int4 primary key,
> empname text,
> salary int4,
> last_date datetime,
> last_user name);
>
> CREATE FUNCTION emp_stamp () RETURNS OPAQUE AS
> BEGIN
>update emp set last_date=''now''::timestamp where id=NEW.id;
Blaise Carrupt wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I use PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on a HP-UX system.
>
> I would like to create a simple function and a simple trigger (or rule) that
> deny a delete from a table if the row is referenced in another table.
>
> I though it should look like this (from my Ingres experience..
Jie Liang wrote:
>
> I think that is a bug in plpgsql,
> when passing a NULL into a plpgsql defined function, it treats
> other arguments as NULL also, you can use raise notice in
> your function to watch this buggy thing(see following).
You're blaming the wrong code for it. It's an insuffi
Josh Berkus wrote:
> This brings up an important point. We have a medium-large user base for
> PL/pgSQL out there, but it appears that Jan Wieck no longer has time to
> develop the language ... nor should he be the sole developer. Howe do
> we find more developers to expand &
Jie Liang wrote:
> Tom,
>
> 1.Where or how I can get pltcl.so? I have not find this file anywhere in
> my
> source except a pltcl.c.
> 2.Dose installation same as plpgsql?
> i.e.
> CREATE FUNCTION pltcl_call_handler () RETURNS OPAQUE AS
> '/usr/local/pgsql/lib/pltcl.so' LANGUAGE 'C';
> C
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Bruce,
>
>Is there any way to make use of the contents of a cursor in a PL/pgSQL
> function? FETCH ... INTO isn't supported, according to the docs. Can I
> use the dot notation, or something similar?
PL/pgSQL doesn't support cursors at all. That's basically a
postgresql wrote:
> How are you professionals handling this problem? I like the ability to
> insert and have the system give me the number. As I grow into more
> workstations inputting the jobs I won't have to worry about chasing
> the next highest number.
Two possible ways:
1. If you
postgresql wrote:
> Jan,
>
> Thanks, I must be missing something here. Bear with me, I am
> trying to form an intelligent question.
>
> Using the serial data type... I don't understand when the backend
> would skip a number.
> If the db is assigning the number with the insert, then if two (or
> mo
pgsql-sql wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Here's my simple question.
>
> I just want to know/get the recent changes made to a table.
> Deeper? I wanted the Postgresql server to *publish* every
> changes made to a table (similar to replication, incremental transfer,
> etc.).
> What is the best way to
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But I'm intrigued: what is it that causes this? Is it *my*
> > recreating the view on which the other views depend,
>
> Yes. You dropped and recreated the view --- the new version may have
> the same name but it's not the same OID, s
Mathijs Brands wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 11:36:56PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> > Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > How about being able to recompile them (keeping the SQL around in the
> > > system catalogs)? Doesn't Oracle allow you to do something like that?
> >
> >
Cedar Cox wrote:
>
> CREATE FUNCTION lastupdated() RETURNS opaque AS '
> begin
> new.last_updated := CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
> return new;
> end;
> ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
>
> CREATE TRIGGER trigname BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE on tblname
> FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE lastupdated();
>
> Note: you co
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
>I have a fuction that creates a record in a table called user_locks,
> does a bunch of stuff, then deletes the record. However, when I try to
> run it, I get the following error:
>
> ERROR: triggered data change violation on relation "user_locks"
>
>It appe
Martín Marqués wrote:
> Is it posible to make a rule execute more then one query?
>
> Something like:
>
> CREATE RULE rule_name AS ON INSERT TO table1
> DO INSTEAD
> INSERT INTO table2 VALUES
> (new.value1,new.value2)
> INSERT INTO table3 VALUES
> (x,y)
Yes:
CREATE RULE rule_name AS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello there
>
> Is it possible to do a query and selecting only the first record in ad
> table ?
>
> e.g. select FIRST * from cars
You can either use a CURSOR and FETCH only the first row, or
use LIMIT (non-standard).
And you might want to explicitly O
R Vijayanath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found your name in the Postgresql web site.
>
> It would be great if you can tell me if I can write a
> procedure that can write the output to the OS(Linux
> OS) file.
>
> Can you assist me on this if there is a way to do it.
>
> We are using Postgresql 7.1 running
Morgan Curley wrote:
> Does anyone know if it is possible to connect to a differernt db from
> within a plsql function.
> I have multilple inter-related schemas and want to enforce some fk
> relationships.
PL/pgSQL doesn't support external database connects. PL/TclU
does.
But keep i
Markus Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I do a SELECT on a non-existing table, SPI_exec won't return.
> I get, e. g. in pgaccess, an error message " does not exist",
> and my code below the function call is never reached.
Right, the SPI_exec() call in turn calls the PostgreSQL
parser and
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi all, me again.
>
> I've been looking at the doc's again (must stop doing that!)
>
> I've been looking at the 'references' clause to implement referential
> integrity. My problem is that I'm wanting to create a cyclic reference, and
> was wondering what problems this may
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Dado,
>
> > But still, the $1 is still plaguing me.
> >
>
> Here's your problem:
>
> > >>CREATE FUNCTION new_proj_pts_seq(int4)
> > >>RETURNS text
> > >>AS 'DECLARE
> > >>proj_ID alias for $1;
> > >>seq_name TEXT;
> > >>BEGIN
> > >>seq_name := '
Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, John Oakes wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me why this always return 1? Thanks!
> >
> > CREATE FUNCTION passrate(date, date, text) RETURNS float AS '
> >
> > DECLARE
> > begindate ALIAS FOR $1;
> > enddate ALIAS FOR $2;
> > passfail ALIAS FOR $3;
> > r
John Oakes wrote:
> Is it possible for a plpgsql function to return a record? I need to return
> multiple values, and preferably in the form of a record. Thanks in advance!
Not useful in any released version of PostgreSQL.
In v7.2 you'll have at least the possibility to return a
Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
> What's the best way to build a relation between two tables ?
> I know that Foreign key is no longer supported.
Who told you so?
Jan
--
#==#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Fuck you and the high horse you rode in on.
Stop that language immediately! It is not accepted on any of
our PostgreSQL mailing lists.
> Yes as a matter of fact I did forget the quote marks. Do you think reading
> that book will help with my silly sy
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Denis,
>
> > I have a case where I wanted to do circular REFERENCES, is this
> > impossible ?
>
> It can be done. It's just a bad idea.
I don't see why it is a bad idea to apply the full business
model to the database schema.
> > Now, each shop REFERENCES a custom
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The point is that we based our implementation of foreign keys
> > on the SQL3 specs. DEFERRED is not in SQL-92 AFAIK.
>
> I still have a concern about this --- sure, you can set up the circular
> ref
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jan,
>
> > All of this is wrong. If the constraints are defined to be
> > INITIALLY DEFERRED, all you have to do is to wrap all the
> > changes that put the database into a temporary inconsistent
> > state into a transaction. What is a good idea and
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Cedar,
>
> > 1. Can a column reference more than one table? (This assumes you use
> > a
> > single sequence to generate the IDs for both "tbla" and "tblb". I
> > guess
> > you would also have the problem of enforcing a unique index. Say
> > what?!
> > A unique index across
Mister ics wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little confused by the "on update restrict" option in a referential
> integrity constraint. I don't know if i have not understood the meaning of
> this statement or it does not work properly.
> I think that if it is specified ON UPDATE RESTRICT in a foreign key
>
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm getting deadlock errors on one of the operations on my web
> application. It's a function which adds a large number of rows to a
> holding table, then updates that set of rows multiple times in order to
> present scoring information to the user.
>
> However, th
Jason wrote:
> I am trying to retrieve records generated in the passed two days and
> encountered difficulties in dealing with the date in Oracle.
> Here is the query I try to form:
>
> select * from Table where InputDate>=[the day before yesterday]
>
> I tried "sysdate-2", didn't work.
> Any sugg
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > i'm reading the postgres documentation and i'm specifically
> > interested in creating stored procedures so that i can keep
> > as much of the business logic in the database as possible.
> > while reading 13.1.3 (SQL Functions on Composite Types) in
> > the Progr
Mister ics wrote:
> >
> > The behaviour is correct according to the SQL specifications.
> > RESTRICT (as well as NO ACTION) means, you cannot change the
> > primary key value of the referenced row. All other values can
> > be changed of course.
> >
> > So an attempt to
> >
> >
Murray Hobbs wrote:
>
> here's my problem
>
> i have tables A, B, C, D
>
> A <- B
> A <- C <- D
>
> i want to maintain integrity so that if A is deleted from then so is
> anything referencing from B and C - no problem ON DELETE CASCADE
>
> but if there are any D's that point back to A (through com
Murray Hobbs wrote:
>
> i neglected to show it properly
>
> have tables A, B, C, D PLUS a few others
>
> A <- B
>
> F
> |
> v
> A <- C <- D
> ^
> |
> E
>
> i want to delete from C and cascade any delete to E or F but not if
> there are records in D
>
> what i have don
Jeff Barrett wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> I am running 7.1.2 and going to 7.1.3 soon.
>
> If I use pl/tclu or pl/perlu I can call this executable from within the
> code?
>
> I have a signifigant limitation, I cannot duplicate the action of the
> programs I want to call in a program I w
Kevin Way wrote:
> I'm unemployed at the moment and this is a pet project, so I can't offer
> much in the way of financial compensation, but I'll start the bidding at
> $50 donation in your name to your choice of the EFF, the Red Cross, or the
> American Cancer Society, in return for a fix. (If n
Kovacs Baldvin wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I tried, and it works: the current CVS version really runs
> happily the query what sent to heaven our 7.1 version of the
> backend.
>
> Kevin: your original complex schema also runs smoothly.
>
> Thanks for our mindful developers!
>
> Regards,
> Baldvin
>
Beth Gatewood wrote:
>
> Chris/ Josh-
>
> OK-response to Chris below. Synopsis heresimply by creating a foreign
> key will not create an index. On large tables I SHOULD put a non-unique
> index on the foreign key (right?)
Right, because on DELETE or UPDATE to the primary key, the
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Wei,
>
> > Does ON DELETE CASCADE attribute you specify in CREATE TABLE
> > statement
> > actually create triggers for every foreign key it refers to?
> >
>
> Yes. Two triggers for each key, I think.
Three, one for INSERT OR UPDATE on the FK table, one
for UPDAT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I have three functions running under 7.03, Now, after the Upgrade to 7.2
> these functions are not working.
> What has changed in version 7.2 that causes this problem.
>
> Function :
>
> CREATE FUNCTION "buildUmfang"("bpchar") RETURNS "text" AS 'DECLARE
>
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:30:54 +0200,
> Michael Agbaglo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > of course you could sort by DOY but then you'll have a problem w/ the
> > next year:
> >
> > if it's let's say december and you select the list for the next 60 days,
> > perso
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: 'Jan Wieck'
> Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [SQL] pg_restore cannot restore function
>
> No any error msg in the logfile, I didn't see any create funct
Kristian Eide wrote:
>
> I have a table with a reference constraint and an ON DELETE SET NULL action.
> When this action triggers, I also want to update another field in the table,
> actually a timestamp which should be set to NOW().
>
> After reading some documentation it would seem a rule is t
JGM wrote:
>
> Could it be true??
>
> I've a table with < 46000 rows. And a little Update like
>
> UPDATE foo set xxx = 'X';
>
> needs about 15 seconds???
>
> What's wrong?
How long since you vacuumed that table? How big are the rows? Are there
triggers, constraints, anything fancy? How many
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
