[SQL] Re: Index Usage and Running Times by FullTextSearch with prefix matching

2013-06-21 Thread rawi
Tom Lane-2 wrote > rawi < > only4com@ > > writes: >> And querying: FTS with prefix matching: > >> SELECT count(a) >> FROM t1 >> WHERE a_tsvector @@ to_tsquery('aaa:* & b:* & c:* & d:*') > >> (RESULT: count: 619) >> Total query runtime: 21266 ms. > > FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for ca

[SQL] Re: Index Usage and Running Times by FullTextSearch with prefix matching

2013-06-18 Thread rawi
rawi wrote > > Tom Lane-2 wrote >> FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD >> (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with >> short prefixes). What PG version are you testing? > Thank you Tom, > > I'm testing on PG 9.1 on UbuntuServer 12.10, 64b

[SQL] Re: Index Usage and Running Times by FullTextSearch with prefix matching

2013-06-13 Thread rawi
Tom Lane-2 wrote > FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD > (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with > short prefixes). Short or long prefixes seem to be equaly unfavorable. Even with the full length of the words, but queried as prefix I get

[SQL] Re: Index Usage and Running Times by FullTextSearch with prefix matching

2013-06-13 Thread rawi
Tom Lane-2 wrote > FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD > (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with > short prefixes). What PG version are you testing? Thank you Tom, I'm testing on PG 9.1 on UbuntuServer 12.10, 64bit I'll update to 9.2 t