Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread stepharo
Thanks! Also btw having a real name instead of webwarrior can improve my trust :). Stef Le 2/11/15 14:25, webwarrior a écrit : Split into subissues; 2 of them are ready, another 2 need discussion On 02.11.2015 18:30, Peter Uhnák [via Smalltalk] wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, stephar

Re: [Pharo-dev] WhatsUp from: 2015-11-02 until: 2015-11-15

2015-11-02 Thread Ferlicot D. Cyril
Le 02/11/2015 16:38, seas...@rmod.lille.inria.fr a écrit : > Hi! We're sending this automatic email twice a month, to give the community > an opportunity to easily know what's happening and to coordinate efforts. > Just answer informally, and feel free to spawn discussions thereafter! > > ### H

Re: [Pharo-dev] WhatsUp from: 2015-11-02 until: 2015-11-15

2015-11-02 Thread Stephan Eggermont
On 02/11/15 16:59, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: Well I have been continuing to add new stuff to UPBE, like Dark Theme, Window Groups and other stuff I am back with my project Ephestos designing a new time managment tool which I call "Chronos Manager" this is a sneak peak of my progress so far Scre

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread webwarrior
Split into subissues; 2 of them are ready, another 2 need discussion On 02.11.2015 18:30, Peter Uhnák [via Smalltalk] wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, stepharo <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > Benjamin forced us to react and the Inria lawyers did their job. > Then he wrote this funny

[Pharo-dev] Pharo support in pkgsrc?

2015-11-02 Thread David S. Alessio
Hello, Is anyone aware of any effort to port Pharo to pkgsrc? pkgsrc already supports Squeak, and if I'm not mistaken, cog, but not Pharo. Cheers Sent from my iPad

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Peter Uhnák
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, stepharo wrote: > Benjamin forced us to react and the Inria lawyers did their job. Then he > wrote this funny sentence. > I asked the inria laywers to stay calm when they saw this sentence. You > know they laugh one minute > and after they want to attack. So I woul

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread stepharo
Benjamin forced us to react and the Inria lawyers did their job. Then he wrote this funny sentence. I asked the inria laywers to stay calm when they saw this sentence. You know they laugh one minute and after they want to attack. So I would ignore anything related to Benjamin because the spirit

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread stepharo
+ 1 :) 2015-11-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 webwarrior >: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725 Almost a month has passed - there are many other things to do - we don't have a real spec maintainer - the issue has milestone "Later" - ~ 300 for milestone pharo 5 i

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Stephan Eggermont
On 02-11-15 16:57, Nicolai Hess wrote: "After I realised that the Pharo board was not able to consider the concept of *copyright infringement*, and that stealing a project was far from an issue to them, I decided to give up and to give away the code since I do not want to fight with people not ev

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Peter Uhnák
> > - ~ 300 for milestone pharo 5 >> > and 18 for Spec (although some look stale) "After I realised that the Pharo board was not able to consider the concept > of *copyright infringement*, and that stealing a project was far from an > issue to them, I decided to give up and to give away the code s

Re: [Pharo-dev] WhatsUp from: 2015-11-02 until: 2015-11-15

2015-11-02 Thread stepharo
### Here's what I've been up to since the last WhatsUp: Working on the Pharo Mooc ### What's next, until 2015-11-15 (*): Finish the Pharo Mooc

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Nicolai Hess
2015-11-02 16:49 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess : > > > 2015-11-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 webwarrior : > >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725 >> >> Almost a month has passed >> >> > - there are many other things to do > - we don't have a real spec maintainer > - the issue has milestone "Later" > - ~ 300 fo

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Nicolai Hess
2015-11-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 webwarrior : > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725 > > Almost a month has passed > > - there are many other things to do - we don't have a real spec maintainer - the issue has milestone "Later" - ~ 300 for milestone pharo 5 if you can create slices for the changes,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 02 Nov 2015, at 16:30, webwarrior wrote: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725 > > Almost a month has passed > yes, there are 600 open issues… Marcus

[Pharo-dev] Case 16725: why no reaction?

2015-11-02 Thread webwarrior
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16725 Almost a month has passed -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Case-16725-why-no-reaction-tp4858968.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Pharo-dev] WhatsUp from: 2015-11-02 until: 2015-11-15

2015-11-02 Thread seaside
Hi! We're sending this automatic email twice a month, to give the community an opportunity to easily know what's happening and to coordinate efforts. Just answer informally, and feel free to spawn discussions thereafter! ### Here's what I've been up to since the last WhatsUp: - $HEROIC_ACHIEVE