Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Thierry Goubier
Le 29/07/2016 à 21:18, stepharo a écrit : Thierry I started a Smacc chapter in the PharoInProgress book. Ok. I'll have a look if I can contribute during my holidays... Thierry Stef Le 29/7/16 à 15:56, Thierry Goubier a écrit : 2016-07-29 15:32 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread stepharo
Thierry I started a Smacc chapter in the PharoInProgress book. Stef Le 29/7/16 à 15:56, Thierry Goubier a écrit : 2016-07-29 15:32 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe >: > On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:23, Thierry Goubier

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread stepharo
Indeed. I was at that talk, and I am not convinced that we are at that level, we are certainly not better in my opinion. The advantage that they have is the domain-specific language on top of the parsing infrastructure which makes it easy and fast to write (at least) the demos he is

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread milton mamani
I agree with Yuriy stack should be in the side For me, the best way could be that you can put the widgets in the position that you want, I mean, the default layout is the vertical(stack, code, attributes) But then with the mouse click, move it to another place in the window, or put it in a new

Re: [Pharo-dev] segfault fresh Pharo5.0 download w/pharo VM version: 5.0 #1 Wed May 4 11:54:28 CEST 2016 gcc 4.6.3 [Production Spur ITHB VM]

2016-07-29 Thread Dale Henrichs
Yesterday I reported that I was using the following script combination: ./pharo Pharo.image save xxx; ./pharo xxx.image --quit --save ./boom.st and that the MNU was being hit during the second case when I was loading boom.st and the same thing is true today, but instead of an MNU I'm

[Pharo-dev] segfault fresh Pharo5.0 download w/pharo VM version: 5.0 #1 Wed May 4 11:54:28 CEST 2016 gcc 4.6.3 [Production Spur ITHB VM]

2016-07-29 Thread Dale Henrichs
Attached crash.dmp file ... running Ubuntu14.04 and here's a bit of Smalltalk stack: 0xffb7d03c I FreeTypeFace(FT2Face)>newFaceFromExternalMemory:index: 0xbc98a58: a(n) FreeTypeFace 0xffb7d064 I FreeTypeFace>create 0xbc98a58: a(n) FreeTypeFace 0xffb7d084 I FreeTypeFace>validate 0xbc98a58:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
> On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:41, Peter Uhnak wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot D. wrote: >> Le 27/07/2016 à 15:04, Denis Kudriashov a écrit : >>> I want it too (but I never try it). >>> >>> And maybe it is good time to force people taste it as

[Pharo-dev] Regular expression to match URIs

2016-07-29 Thread Casimiro - GMAIL
If someone is in need to parse URIs, then the following regex handle it: | regStr regex | regStr := '((([a-z]\w+\:)', "Match URL protocol and colon" '(/|//|///|[A-Za-z0-9%]))', "Match 1-3 slashes or single letter or digit or %"

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Serge Stinckwich
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:23, Thierry Goubier wrote: >> >> Hi Sven, >> >> I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial : >> the pattern language of RB (and the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Johan Fabry
I was at that talk, and I am not convinced that we are at that level, we are certainly not better in my opinion. The advantage that they have is the domain-specific language on top of the parsing infrastructure which makes it easy and fast to write (at least) the demos he is showing. We don’t

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Thierry Goubier
2016-07-29 15:32 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe : > > > On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:23, Thierry Goubier > wrote: > > > > Hi Sven, > > > > I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial > : the pattern language of RB (and the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:23, Thierry Goubier wrote: > > Hi Sven, > > I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial : > the pattern language of RB (and the underlying pattern matching and > unification algorithm) is top notch, and how SmaCC

[Pharo-dev] Limbo/PharoInProgress repositories

2016-07-29 Thread Serge Stinckwich
Dear all, on SquareBracketAssociates github org, I see a Limbo repo : https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/PharoLimbo and a PharoInProgress repo: https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/PharoInProgress Basically there are collections of chapters that are not part of any books until now.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread Peter Uhnak
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot D. wrote: > Le 27/07/2016 à 15:04, Denis Kudriashov a écrit : > > I want it too (but I never try it). > > > > And maybe it is good time to force people taste it as default? (with > > setting to return classic one) > > > > Hi, > > At the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Serge Stinckwich
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote: > Hi Sven, > > I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial : > the pattern language of RB (and the underlying pattern matching and > unification algorithm) is top notch, and how SmaCC

Re: [Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Sven, I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial : the pattern language of RB (and the underlying pattern matching and unification algorithm) is top notch, and how SmaCC builds on RB to virtually generate code / optimise code / then compile is nothing short of

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2016-07-29 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/50761 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] fcfdd5: 50761

2016-07-29 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/5.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: fcfdd5f5d6b21ee6d39951dcf48b242eb1fba0a6 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/fcfdd5f5d6b21ee6d39951dcf48b242eb1fba0a6 Author: Jenkins Build Server Date:

[Pharo-dev] Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News

2016-07-29 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
The following interesting question/thread could use some more comments/votes: Ask HN: Examples of elegant, non-trivial Smalltalk? | Hacker News > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12185892 > Sven

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread Denis Kudriashov
2016-07-29 13:28 GMT+02:00 Cyril Ferlicot D. : > Hi, > > At the integration it was the default but it was changed since more > people found the old way more convenient. > > But I agree it should be a setting :) > I was think that problem was related to Mooc videos which

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread Cyril Ferlicot D.
Le 27/07/2016 à 15:04, Denis Kudriashov a écrit : > I want it too (but I never try it). > > And maybe it is good time to force people taste it as default? (with > setting to return classic one) > Hi, At the integration it was the default but it was changed since more people found the old way

Re: [Pharo-dev] Option for as-in-moose debugger layout

2016-07-29 Thread webwarrior
I second this. Have been using GTDebugger since Pharo3 and always found its layout more convenient. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Option-for-as-in-moose-debugger-layout-tp4908132p4908597.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-29 Thread Denis Kudriashov
2016-07-29 10:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl : > That sounds wonderful! Thank you very much! Is the new code online? Not yet. Probably I will finish it next week.

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-29 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 29.07.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Denis Kudriashov : > > Hi Norbert. > > 2016-07-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov >: > > I see big room for optimizations here. > Look at very small unit of communication: delivering

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-29 Thread Pavel Krivanek
2016-07-29 10:20 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov : > Hi Norbert. > > 2016-07-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov : > >> >> I see big room for optimizations here. >> Look at very small unit of communication: delivering integer result (from >> [1+2]

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-29 Thread Denis Kudriashov
Hi Norbert. 2016-07-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov : > > I see big room for optimizations here. > Look at very small unit of communication: delivering integer result (from > [1+2] evaluation). Following object is responsible for this: > > request :=

Re: [Pharo-dev] newly introduced problem in Pharo5.0 running headless vm (Ubuntu 14.04)

2016-07-29 Thread stepharo
Yes I saw it too. Stef Le 28/7/16 à 23:30, Dale Henrichs a écrit : Thanks Nicolai ... that looks exactly like my problem ... I see that this report is from earlier in July, so it presumably will crop up randomly .. Dale On 07/28/2016 02:24 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote: Hi Dale, I think this