2017-06-30 8:28 GMT-03:00 Norbert Hartl :
>> Am 30.06.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Stephane Ducasse :
>> recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they
>> manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own
>> implementation and I will
> But what is DataFrame?
the new collection done by alesnedr from Lviv. It is really nice but
does not solve the problem of the compact syntax.
>>
>> STON fromString: 'Point[10,20]'
>>
> Same goes for JSON.
>
>> We were brainstorming with marcus and we could have a first nice extension:
>>
>> {
2017-06-30 17:58 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman :
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Pavel Krivanek
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the reviewing of the pull requests is currently not as easy as we would
>> like to have. For simple changes it should be enough to
Thanks!
This is cool
I'm learning how to PR too :).
Stef
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Pavel Krivanek
wrote:
> The PR is updated
>
> -- Pavel
>
> 2017-06-30 16:44 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant :
>>
>> Attached is the changeset as discussed in my
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Alistair Grant
> wrote:
>
>> Rajula, thanks for your write-up.
>>
>> As the person who pushed Rajula to send his email I feel I should
>> respond.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Pavel Krivanek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the reviewing of the pull requests is currently not as easy as we would
> like to have. For simple changes it should be enough to go to the pull
> requests list
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:55:29PM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> The PR is updated
>
> -- Pavel
Thanks, Pavel!
> 2017-06-30 16:44 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant :
>
> Attached is the changeset as discussed in my last email.
>
> Just to be clear, this is just for
The PR is updated
-- Pavel
2017-06-30 16:44 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant :
> Attached is the changeset as discussed in my last email.
>
> Just to be clear, this is just for reference, I'm happy to redo the PR
> if it will save you and/or Pavel some time.
>
> Cheers,
>
Attached is the changeset as discussed in my last email.
Just to be clear, this is just for reference, I'm happy to redo the PR
if it will save you and/or Pavel some time.
Cheers,
Alistair
On 30 June 2017 at 16:42, Alistair Grant wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> Good pickup.
>
> I
Hi Stef,
Good pickup.
I also can't load
SLICE-Issue-20165-Support-segment-path-printing-AlistairGrant.1.
Somehow it is dependent on FileSystem-Core-AlistairGrant.223, and I
have no idea what that is (I don't remember ever creating it, and I
don't have a copy on my machine anywhere, or in any of
Hi alistair
I'm starting to review code that is in the PR pipeline.
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/126
I noticed that you wrote in the slice
Changes since last slice:
- Change Path>>fullName to just print the path
- Fix absolute path strings
- Bug fix Path class>>from:delimiter:
-
Branch: refs/tags/60505
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Branch: refs/heads/6.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: d096961f099012edaa6a1447bb0868a7abfe34db
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/d096961f099012edaa6a1447bb0868a7abfe34db
Author: Jenkins Build Server
Date:
I have done some work on packaging up pharo projects for Nix so that images
can be created in the sandboxed build environment. I am a bit stuck though.
I have a script that takes a project named and creates a specification of
all the required mcz files, recursing into dependencies:
Here is the
Hi,
> Am 30.06.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Stephane Ducasse :
>
> Hi
>
> recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they
> manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own
> implementation and I will switch to DataFrame).
>
having an abstract
for fun I implemented asObjectOf:
MCSmalltalkhubRepository
owner: 'StephaneDucasse'
project: 'asObjectOf'
user: ''
password: ''
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Stephane Ducasse
wrote:
> Hi
>
> recently I started to read a book on machine learning and
Ok. Then we can have an ordered expression :)
A sequence without a declaration is a bit useless.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Damien Pollet wrote:
> Surprising that a sequence is not an expression. I'm pretty sure that (1+2.
> 2+3) is an expression that returns 5
Hi
recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they
manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own
implementation and I will switch to DataFrame).
Now it occurred to me that when we program complex objects we do not
need a compact literal syntax for our objects. But when
Surprising that a sequence is not an expression. I'm pretty sure that (1+2.
2+3) is an expression that returns 5 (after computing a useless addition).
What is currently not an expression is the variable declaration, indeed.
But if we make |d| an expression then that means we can declare variables
I do not get why (Yes I know it is because it is not in the syntax
but it is conceptually not nice).
| d |
d := Dictionary new.
d at: #top at: #below1 put: 1.
d at: #top at: #below1 put: 2.
d at: #top at: #below1.
is not an expression in Pharo.
It means that I can manipulate
1 + 3,
x + 3
I did not take any blame in wht you say. I just wanted to explain that
yes comments can be wrong :)
I'm super happy to get some brains looking at improving FS.
I'm fighting to see how we can start to integrate faster changes in P70.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Alistair Grant
Hi Stef,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:46:44AM +0200, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi alistair
>
> I do not know if this is me that wrote a wrong path class comment.
> You should consider that theere were nearly no comment at all and I
> started to try to give more love to this great library.
>
>
I did a simlink
total 124088
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ducasse admin 381 Jun 30 10:18
Pharo7.0-32bit-70f3b57.changes
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ducasse admin 29740016 Jun 29 13:38 Pharo7.0-32bit-70f3b57.image
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ducasse admin 33711804 Jun 29 13:37
Pharo7.0-32bit-70f3b57.sources
-rw-r--r--@ 1 ducasse
I do not get why
repository := IceRepositoryCreator new
location:
('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/ActiveResearch/Pharo/PharoCodeBase/pharo-core'
asFileReference);
is not working and
repository := IceRepositoryCreator new
location: ('pharo-core' asFileReference);
+ simlink would be
Ok I try to understand.
I already cloned the github repo and I do not want to be forced to
download all these small files all the time.
I want one place with all the forked code one and only one.
I will try to create a simlink and try again.
Tx
Stef
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Pavel
Hi Guillermo,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:12:32AM +0200, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
> Rajula, thanks for your write-up.
>
> As the person who pushed Rajula to send his email I feel I should
> respond.
>
Hi,
the reviewing of the pull requests is currently not as easy as we would
like to have. For simple changes it should be enough to go to the pull
requests list (https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pulls) and review the
changes from the GitHub web interface. In case that the PR passes tests
Unfortunately you cannot share the repository the way you try because it
always needs to be in the image working directory in a folder named
'pharo-core'. Without it the Monticello will not be able to see changes int
the packages.
On one location place Pharo 7 image and execute the first script
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Alistair Grant
wrote:
> Rajula, thanks for your write-up.
>
> As the person who pushed Rajula to send his email I feel I should
> respond.
>
> While I'm in favour of Rajula's proposed changes, scripting in
> particular will be much easier,
DoIt
^ repository remotes
detect: [ :remote |
self halt.
remote remoteName = 'pharo' ]
remote remoteName returns 'origin' and not the name of the fork
so what is
upstream? Pharo on github
origin? the one local?
Stef
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Stephane Ducasse
Thanks for the detailed explanation Rajula. I think it makes perfect sense to
separate working and image directories from each other. What you didn't mention
is how the current working directory is resolved when an image is not started
from the command line but by using the operating systems
On 29 June 2017 at 18:29, Alistair Grant wrote:
> git clone https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git
> cd opensmalltalk-vm
> git checkout 6a63f68
>
Just in quick happy testing...
The 32-bit VM seems to be fine the 64-bit VM is not working
So I do not understand
Now if I do
repository := IceRepositoryCreator new
location:
('/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/ActiveResearch/Pharo/PharoCodeBase/pharo-core'
asFileReference);
subdirectory:'src';
createRepository.
repository register.
it works but doing it twice breaks. How can I
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:56, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
> Rajula, thanks for your write-up.
>
> As the person who pushed Rajula to send his email I feel I should
> respond.
>
> While I'm in favour of Rajula's proposed changes, scripting in
> particular will be much easier,
Rajula, thanks for your write-up.
As the person who pushed Rajula to send his email I feel I should
respond.
While I'm in favour of Rajula's proposed changes, scripting in
particular will be much easier, I think we need to make the change
generally known as it will not always be obvious, e.g. at
No I did it from a freshly donwloaded image. Pharo7.0-32bit-70f3b57.zip
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Pavel Krivanek
wrote:
> The script in section "Use already created clone" is supposed to be used by
> a fresh Pharo 7 image. Maybe you are trying it on an image that
Hi alistair
I'm not expert of file system. Now I like your idea to have explicit
messages such as canonalize or expand.
Stef
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Alistair Grant wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:31:42PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> Hi
The script in section "Use already created clone" is supposed to be used by
a fresh Pharo 7 image. Maybe you are trying it on an image that already has
the repository set? Even if I tried to use the name 'pharo' instead of
'myFork', the scripts work.
Cheers,
-- Pavel
2017-06-30 9:34 GMT+02:00
Hi alistair
I do not know if this is me that wrote a wrong path class comment.
You should consider that theere were nearly no comment at all and I
started to try to give more love to this great library.
Stef
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Alistair Grant wrote:
> Hi
Hi pavel
Since I want to reuse my clone. I tried the following. But I have no
idea about the name of my fork so I put the one of my fork = pharo and
it seems that this is what should be done.
Now when I execute this script I get
'You already have an Iceberg repository
So hat should I do?
It is an iceberg plugin. 100% Pharo Code, uses the github.com rest api.
On 30 Jun 2017 09:25, "Stephane Ducasse" wrote:
> What is the github plugin? an Iceberg Pharo code or a C plugin?
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano
>
What is the github plugin? an Iceberg Pharo code or a C plugin?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 18:21, Nicolai Hess wrote:
>
> And if I only want to contribute by reviewing a fix. Do I have to go the
>
42 matches
Mail list logo