Hi,
There is no processor for that. Now, if the order would work the current
processor would be enough.
But, if you want just that message, you can write your own processor. Would you
like to try? It would be a useful exercise and I can guide you and we can use
your questions to guide the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are
Hi,
> On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are recurring questions about GTSpotter, along the lines of:
>
> why Spotter does not work
Sven I'm not against spotter. This is why I will try to do a video
assuming that all the bugs are fixed.
Now if I have 30 min to do a videos I do not have 5 days to understand
how to use and try spotter
because when I have few moments to program I need something fully working.
Stef
Le 20/2/16
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 11:06, stepharo wrote:
>
> Tx sven
> I will see if I use this scenario for a video to explain my friend Spotter.
> If you have scenario that I can blindly follow I'm eager to try to produce a
> video.
Yes, that would be good.
But even better would be if
Tx sven
I will see if I use this scenario for a video to explain my friend Spotter.
If you have scenario that I can blindly follow I'm eager to try to
produce a video.
Hi,
This is in the latest #50591, BTW.
Starting with the 3rd one, searching for classes, that has been working well
since
Hi,
There are recurring questions about GTSpotter, along the lines of:
why Spotter does not work well for 95% of the cases
- implement
- send
- class
- class refs?
This is in the latest #50591, BTW.
Starting with the 3rd