On Tuesday 03 May 2011 19:25:47 Johan Brichau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I traced a bug when working with timespans to the following issue illustrated
> in the code snippet below.
> The last expression in the snippet yields false, although it should yield
> true (imho).
>
> |start end span|
>
Hi,
Lets end this thread quickly - I don't think it warrants a flame war.
I took a hard line on the "toddler" bit as there is a tendency for some, often
new
members in the community to jump to conclusions about what is a pretty elegent
platform (Squeak), and presume oversight or errors by defa
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> 1. self assert: 2 days hours = 48
> 2. do
> 3. it
>
> it will fail
>
> It's a bug because of what is said in the comment. But please don't even
> think in fixing it by changing the comment. Even a toddler would expect to
> see 48 hours in a duration of two days.
>
On Friday 04 March 2011 12:12:45 Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> I added an issue 3782
> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3782) that collects
> pangrams for various languages. The font chooser then should show
> something like:
>
> the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
> THE QUICK B
> I would really like to have the approach proposed by K. Beck on conversion
> methods. Conversion methods for API compatible objects. Of course it will
> lead to less compact program (URL readFrom: 'http://' instead of 'http://'
> url) but avoids a lot of code in String (of course class extensions
Hi all,+
Could those in the know comment on how this <...> proposal is (or is not)
consistent with the fundamental Smalltalk principles
that:
1. "an object is send a message and responds with an object"
2. there is no other "magic" in the system.
Are we proposing a break fromv this ? If so, IM
> What is Timestamp?
A legacy class that has a Date and a TIme object.
Predates ANSI DateAndTime.
Should be purged IMHO.
Brent
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pha
> Do you have examples? For month I have problems,
> Then I wonder why
>
> aDateAndTime = aMonth
> is better
> than
> aDateAndTime month = aMonth
Hi, Chris Muller has just told me that I am dead wron on the equality issue, so
I stand corrected. He will post soon.
On the above, this is a bit of a
On Friday 23 April 2010 21:12:03 Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm trying to fix some tests and I do not like the behavior of DateAndTime
> = Comparing aDateAndTime and a something tries to convert the something in
> a dateAndTime automagically. I find that not really good because it hides
>
> time1 := DateAndTime now.
> time2 := DateAndTime now.
> self assert: [ (time2 - time1) > 0 ]
When I implemented DateAndTime, the above was true. Has this changed ?
Brent
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.
10 matches
Mail list logo
