On 13 February 2013 19:35, stephane ducasse wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> On 13 February 2013 16:03, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>>>
stephane ducasse wrote
> @sean what was the problem because
Frank Shearar-3 wrote
> As a general rule this is a very bad idea
+1. It's a bad habit to get into and subverts part of MetaC's usefulness, as
Frank described. In fact, I find 4.5.1 very exciting, because it uses
semantic versioning to communicate a whole world to the user without a long
comment.
On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 13 February 2013 16:03, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>>
>>> stephane ducasse wrote
@sean what was the problem because I tested it several time on 1.4 and 2.0
>>>
>>> The tests w
On 13 February 2013 16:03, stephane ducasse wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
>> stephane ducasse wrote
>>> @sean what was the problem because I tested it several time on 1.4 and 2.0
>>
>> The tests were failing due to FS differences between 1.4 and 2.0. I uploaded
On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> stephane ducasse wrote
>> @sean what was the problem because I tested it several time on 1.4 and 2.0
>
> The tests were failing due to FS differences between 1.4 and 2.0. I uploaded
> fixes, so we could do a 4.5.1 with the latest packages (
stephane ducasse wrote
> @sean what was the problem because I tested it several time on 1.4 and 2.0
The tests were failing due to FS differences between 1.4 and 2.0. I uploaded
fixes, so we could do a 4.5.1 with the latest packages (4.5 is tagged
release so we shouldn't change it). Also, I moved t
David T. Lewis wrote
> I thought that I got rid of all the explicit references to FileDirectory
> and
> ReferenceStream, so check to make sure you're using the latest version of
> OSProcess. Maybe I missed a few of the references, there were quite a few.
I think you're right... don't know what I w
normally
On Feb 12, 2013, at 5:59 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:13:39AM -0800, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>> stephane ducasse wrote
>>> I will update their configurations and publish them in the squeaksource
>>> repository
>>> and the MetaRepoForPharo20.
>>
>> I fixed the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:13:39AM -0800, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> stephane ducasse wrote
> > I will update their configurations and publish them in the squeaksource
> > repository
> > and the MetaRepoForPharo20.
>
> I fixed the configs to work on Pharo 1.4 and Pharo 2.0 and uploaded to
> sqs/Met
stephane ducasse wrote
> I will update their configurations and publish them in the squeaksource
> repository
> and the MetaRepoForPharo20.
I fixed the configs to work on Pharo 1.4 and Pharo 2.0 and uploaded to
sqs/MetaRepo... and ss3/MetaFor20... There are still some issues (like tests
are failin
David
In fact Sean and others did a good job so I will update their configurations
and publish them in the squeaksource repository
and the MetaRepoForPharo20.
I will let you know when you can test it.
Stef
> Stef,
>
> Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell, because
>
I published a new version of the badly named ConfigurationOfOSProcess.
Next steps:
- renaming it to ConfigurationOfCommandShell
- explicit the dependency to OSProcess
- Check what sean did and publish
Stef
On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:14 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Stef,
>
> T
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:54:55PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:14 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> > Stef,
> >
> > Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell, because
> > we also have a ConfigurationOfOSProcess in
> > http://www.squeaksource.com/
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:54:25PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
>
> > Probably you need to load OSProcess. From a package point of view, the two
> > are completely independent. You can load either OSProcess or CommandShell
> > without loading the other. But from a practical point of view, Comman
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:42:39PM -0800, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> David T. Lewis wrote
> > Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell
>
> I was maintaining a ConfigurationOfCommandShell at
> http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository . I had done some
> investigation i
thanks sean.
I will have a look and I should rename the configuration.
and the configruation should be publish in the package then once it will be
ready I will push it to the MetacelloRepository.
On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> David T. Lewis wrote
>> Thanks! Probably we
On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:14 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Stef,
>
> Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell, because
> we also have a ConfigurationOfOSProcess in
> http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository.
> You have commit access to SqS/CommandShell if you want to p
>> The first version is loading in 2.0:)
>> Do you want me to publish it in the www.squeaksource.com. repository?
>
> Yes, that would be fine. I don't know if it should go in the CommandShell
> repository
> or a Pharo one? I added you as developer on CommandShell so you can commit it
> the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:34:37PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
>
> - when I typed ls in the command tools I get an error because
> withBlanksTrimmed DNU
> we could add it as an extension as follows.
> String>> withBlanksTrimmed
> ^ self trimBoth
>
> - same for withou
David T. Lewis wrote
> Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell
I was maintaining a ConfigurationOfCommandShell at
http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository . I had done some
investigation into the dependencies and coded them into the baseline. Maybe
you can use it fo
Stef,
Thanks! Probably we should call this ConfigurationOfCommandShell, because
we also have a ConfigurationOfOSProcess in
http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository.
You have commit access to SqS/CommandShell if you want to post it there also.
Dave
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:54:08PM -0300
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:34:37PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
> David
>
> The first version is loading in 2.0:)
> Do you want me to publish it in the www.squeaksource.com. repository?
Yes, that would be fine. I don't know if it should go in the CommandShell
repository
or a Pharo one?
David
I commited a first version here:
MCHttpRepository
location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/StephaneDucasse/PetitsBazars/main'
user: 'StephaneDucasse'
password: ''
Stef
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> David
>
> The first version is loading in
David
The first version is loading in 2.0:)
Do you want me to publish it in the www.squeaksource.com. repository?
Some feedback:
- you have some circular dependencies between base and Commands.
Commandshell in base relies on ShellBuiltin
installCommands:
I'm working on a configuration. I will let you know if it loads :)
can you tell me a bit the dependencies between the package?
Base
Pipping
Commands
For now I will do it really simple.
Stef
On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> I have updated CommandShell for
Ok then I will give a try this evening.
Stef
On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:24 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
>> I can write a configuration if you want.
>>
>> Stef
>
> That would be great, thank you!
>
> Dave
>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2013, at
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0300, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
> I can write a configuration if you want.
>
> Stef
That would be great, thank you!
Dave
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> > I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional
> > upd
I can write a configuration if you want.
Stef
On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
> I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional
> updates to OSProcess also. In addition to CommandShell-Piping, the rest
> of the CommandShell package (except for CommandShel
David T. Lewis wrote
> I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional
> updates to OSProcess also. In addition to CommandShell-Piping...
Thanks again, David. OSProcess & Piping are absolutely essential, and
CommandShell is really cool. It's so important that we have them work
I have updated CommandShell for Pharo 2.0, and made a few additional
updates to OSProcess also. In addition to CommandShell-Piping, the rest
of the CommandShell package (except for CommandShell-MVC) can now be
loaded into Pharo 2.0. CommandShellPharo provides the menu registration
to make "Command
30 matches
Mail list logo
