On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Johan Brichau wrote:
> I think it's not a good idea to dump the 3.0.x branch
this is not what I meant.
I was talking about marketing = name of the release ( I prefer to use a soft
that is 3.3 and 3.0.0.0.2.alpha - even if semantic versionning is cool).
> Many pe
I think it's not a good idea to dump the 3.0.x branch
Many people are using that + 3.1 is still in development
On 28 Mar 2013, at 10:32, stephane ducasse wrote:
> thanks Paul.
>
> I should say that I would have love not to have
> 3.0.1.
> 3.0.2
> so I'm really eager to get
thanks Paul.
I should say that I would have love not to have
3.0.1.
3.0.2
so I'm really eager to get seaside 3.1 out
but at least something that can be marketed as movement.
Stef
On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Paul DeBruicker wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote
>> Hi
Excellent!
I really want to demo Seaside with 2.0
> I'm merging mine and Paul's configuration for Seaside 3.0.7 into Diego's and
> Stefan's work.
>
> Of course, there's always stuff that gets in the way of finishing that (like
> moving our offices ;-).
>
> I hope to have one by end of the we
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
> Hi guys
>
> we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that
> Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0.
> I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where can we find it
> because we would like to publish it in the
> MetaRepoForPharo20.
>
I'm merging mine and Paul's configuration for Seaside 3.0.7 into Diego's and
Stefan's work.
Of course, there's always stuff that gets in the way of finishing that (like
moving our offices ;-).
I hope to have one by end of the week for Seaside 3.0.7. The intention is that
we merge this into the
Stef wrote:
>we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that
>Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0.
>I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where can we find it
>because we would like to publish it in the
>MetaRepoForPharo20.
We have it working, but it do
2013/3/27 Mariano Martinez Peck :
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that
>> Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0.
>> I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where ca
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that
> Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0.
> I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where can we find it
> because we would like to publish i
Hi guys
we would like to use seaside to validate the VM and also make sure that
Seaside31. works perfectly in Pharo2.0.
I saw that some of you have a working configuration. Where can we find it
because we would like to publish it in the
MetaRepoForPharo20.
Stef
10 matches
Mail list logo