Hi guys
I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read.
We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this
is important
for our concentration.
I really like the other discussions but we should have them in Pharo-users.
I think that it makes sense.
S
+1
Doru
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:24 AM, stepharo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read.
> We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is
> important
> for our concentration.
> I really like the other discussions
Absolutely!
Norbert
> Am 15.01.2015 um 08:24 schrieb stepharo :
>
> Hi guys
>
> I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read.
> We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is
> important
> for our concentration.
> I really like the other d
> On 15 Jan 2015, at 08:24, stepharo wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read.
> We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is
> important
> for our concentration.
> I really like the other discussions but we sho
does that mean that announcing new pharo tools that are included in the
standard pharo distribution should go to pharo-users ?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:24 AM, stepharo wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read.
> We should be more disciplined. P
To me it goes like that:
- pharo-dev is used by people that discuss, develop, bug fix the pharo image
itself
- pharo-users is used by people that maybe just want to download pharo and work
with it not interested in the detailed internal things
- a pharo-dev person is very likely subscribed to ph
+1
All Pharo discussions have taken place on this mailing for a long time.
Even after starting pharo-users, for people who were already longtime
readers of this list favored this list for any and all discussions
concerning Pharo. It will be a culture shift for longtime Pharo users,
lurkers. I
Indeed, as far as it is about announcing, it makes sense to announce it
on pharo-users only.
Hilaire
Le 15/01/2015 10:07, kilon alios a écrit :
> does that mean that announcing new pharo tools that are included in the
> standard pharo distribution should go to pharo-users ?
>
--
Dr. Geo - htt
Looks like that SO question was re-opened. Maybe SO can be educated?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> +1
>
> All Pharo discussions have taken place on this mailing for a long time.
> Even after starting pharo-users, for people who were already longtime
> readers of this l
Blake wrote:
>Looks like that SO question was re-opened. Maybe SO can be educated?
Yes, but I'm not going to spend the time having a discussion on Meta each time
a question should be reopened, especially as there are no signs of a solution.
Stephan
10 matches
Mail list logo
