Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

- Original Message - From: "William Zucca" Thank you very much for the chance to hear the non-vocal version. What is the source of that recording? Did Victor release this alternate take under the same catalog number? The non-vocal take of "Charleston" is on the CD -- 20th CENTURY

Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

I highly doubt that..I'll ask my friend Dick Carty, he's a Billy Murray expert and would probably know. From: William Zucca To: Antique Phonograph List Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 4:48:29 PM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

Well, a friend once told me that it was actually BILLY MURRAY, but I can't verify this. Thank you very much for the chance to hear the non-vocal version. What is the source of that recording? Did Victor release this alternate take under the same catalog number? GrnMountainBill On Wed, Jan 19,

Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

ed, 19 Jan 2011 18:32:38 To: Antique Phonograph List Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List Subject: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O The same voice made a four syllable reappearance on "Charlestonette", 4 months later. I assume he was a band member. Here's Charleston, take

Re: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

That attempt at scat just made me embarrassed for him! -Original Message- From: "DanKj" Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:32:38 To: Antique Phonograph List Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List Subject: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O The

[Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O

The same voice made a four syllable reappearance on "Charlestonette", 4 months later. I assume he was a band member. Here's Charleston, take 5, which has no vocal effects. There are a couple of overmodulated moments, so maybe that's why this take wasn't used. http://www.box.net/shared/m8niz5