BB why not = then. imo the parser will easily distinguish array
BB definition from an expression
The last thing we need is symbol reuse. The parser can distinguish a lot
of things, the problem is that the human developer would be confused. =
has a clear meaning in PHP, adding other meaning to it
In article Pine.LNX.4.30.0109261951320.1096-10
@mars.office.jdimedia.nl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Hello,
what is your configure line?
Hmmm, i have checked this a few days ago.
In the meantime the warnings have reduce less
than 10:
nice :-)
In file included from
Whoa. Once again I'm on that train of thought that eliminates the
difference between classes and namespaces. +1 from me.
- Stig
[Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It also uses :: for both
classes and namespaces.
Zeev
At 21:35 30-09-01, Stig
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 09:35 PM 9/30/2001 +0200, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hey,
I just started playing around with the parser to support the
namespaces syntax Stig laid out in his RFC. I think I've thought of an
ambiguity (with
[Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On September 30, 2001 06:15 pm, Wez Furlong wrote:
What about . then (Java/Delphi)?
--Wez.
Wouldn't that conflict with the concatenation operator?
Unless I am mistaken, it looks like only the following single symbols
are available: % * | \ (outside of
Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
Whoa. Once again I'm on that train of thought that eliminates the
difference between classes and namespaces. +1 from me.
- Stig
[Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It also uses :: for both
classes and namespaces.
I still think Zeev's suggestion (HTML::Table) is very good, if it
doesn't impose too much runtime overhead.
+1 for ::
If that is impossible, how about some new combination, like :
HTML:Table looks ok, too...
Cheerio, Marc.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
At 12:46 PM 10/1/2001 +0200, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
[Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On September 30, 2001 06:15 pm, Wez Furlong wrote:
What about . then (Java/Delphi)?
--Wez.
Wouldn't that conflict with the concatenation operator?
Unless I am mistaken, it looks like only the
At 12:48 PM 10/1/2001 +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
Whoa. Once again I'm on that train of thought that eliminates the
difference between classes and namespaces. +1 from me.
- Stig
[Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Marc Boeren wrote :
I still think Zeev's suggestion (HTML::Table) is very good, if it
doesn't impose too much runtime overhead.
+1 for ::
If that is impossible, how about some new combination, like :
Er... I usually don't want my code smile
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Marc Boeren wrote:
If that is impossible, how about some new combination, like :
HTML:Table looks ok, too...
Some languages use quotes like ' or ` to indicate namespaces. Since the
context in question may not allow the start of a string constant
On October 1, 2001 04:46 am, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
[Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On September 30, 2001 06:15 pm, Wez Furlong wrote:
What about . then (Java/Delphi)?
--Wez.
Wouldn't that conflict with the concatenation operator?
Unless I am mistaken, it looks like only
On October 1, 2001 04:51 am, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 12:46 PM 10/1/2001 +0200, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
[snip]
I still think Zeev's suggestion (HTML::Table) is very good, if it
doesn't impose too much runtime overhead.
I don't like Zeev's suggestion because it does impose an extra hash
BB why not = then. imo the parser will easily distinguish array
BB definition from an expression
The last thing we need is symbol reuse. The parser can distinguish a lot
of things, the problem is that the human developer would be confused. =
has a clear meaning in PHP, adding other meaning
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:55:16PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Maybe we need to think if there's a possibility to combine namespaces and
classes and therefore it automatically would be ::. I am against two
mechanisms that use :: but if we can find a nice way of combining the two
(haven't
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I am OK with such an ambiguity error. What about the rest of the people?
I think it will be okay. Anyone using (non-newbie) features like
namespaces and ternary operations should understand the
ramifications of stressing the
- Original Message -
From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dean Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]; George Schlossnagle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 03.15am
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2]
i've looked at the latest Zend CVS and like what i see with regards to
exceptions, and i'd like to make a suggestion.
in other languages (c++, delphi and Java for sure), you can specify the type
of exception you are interested in in the catch block. short of this, the
programmer would have to
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:57:12 -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I am OK with such an ambiguity error. What about the rest of the people?
I think it will be okay. Anyone using (non-newbie) features like
namespaces and ternary operations
'/' is the only operator I can think of that seems to make any sense
whatsoever here and is not already used as an operator.
I guess you do not divide? :)
Zeev
Hmm... I'd personally recommend that the namespace operator is ; as no-one
ever uses the semi-colon, do they?
Sorry,
Stupid suggestion, is ::: (three colons) pushing it?
Zeev
At 16:29 01-10-01, John Parker wrote:
'/' is the only operator I can think of that seems to make any sense
whatsoever here and is not already used as an operator.
I guess you do not divide? :)
Zeev
Hmm... I'd personally
Stupid suggestion, is ::: (three colons) pushing it?
What's wrong with :, except for the fact that it resembles a smiley?
There is already - and =...
Cheerio, Marc.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dean Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 09.25am
Subject: Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV]
Re: [Zend Engine 2] namespaces ambiguity
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote :
Stupid suggestion, is ::: (three colons) pushing it?
For me better than anything else which came up (smileys,
arithmetical operators, comments).
sigh I step away from the computer
Quoting Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sigh I step away from the computer for the weekend, and such an
interesting discussion ensues. For the record, I'd vote for either
unifying classes and namespaces (I like that approach)
As do I... Andi, Zeev - are there technical problems with
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
As do I... Andi, Zeev - are there technical problems with this? We already have
static class methods; having static class variables and static class-specific
constants seems like a logical extension of this to me, and it gives you a
It would mean we'd need to have nested classes.
or limit namespaces to only contain classes:
namespace::namespace::...::class::method();
is there a reason why a namespace should contain anything other than
classes ?
we have static functions and static members in classes, no need for them
in
Quoting Harald Radi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
is there a reason why a namespace should contain anything other than classes ?
we have static functions and static members in classes, no need for them
in namespaces too.
We don't have static members. And we need namespaces for constants, also.
We don't have static members.
but we will in ze2 !?
And we need namespaces for
constants, also.
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
namespace Foo;
class Bar {
static function bar() {
echo $Foo::BAR;
}
}
if (Foo::Bar::bar() === $Foo::BAR) {
echo juhuuu;
} else {
echo damn;
}
Quoting Harald Radi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And we need namespaces for
constants, also.
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
I'm sorry, I haven't been following all of this - is 'final' a keyword that
will be available (and enforced) in ze2?
-chuck
--
Charles
I'm sorry, I haven't been following all of this - is 'final'
a keyword that
will be available (and enforced) in ze2?
i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class /
namespace ?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Redhat 6.2
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: Mail related
Bug description: mail() is not supported
When trying to send mail using PHP the following error message is
received:
Warning: mail() is not supported in this PHP build
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote:
why ?
class Foo {
final $BAR = blah;
}
namespace Foo;
class Bar {
static function bar() {
echo $Foo::BAR;
}
}
if (Foo::Bar::bar() === $Foo::BAR) {
echo juhuuu;
} else {
echo damn;
}
you have classes, you have
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote:
i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class /
namespace ?
echo Foo::CONSTANT;
-Andrei
Try to spend the next 30 seconds not thinking
about a blue-eyed polar bear. -Feodor Dostoevsky
--
PHP Development Mailing List
At 17:16 01-10-01, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
Quoting Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sigh I step away from the computer for the weekend, and such an
interesting discussion ensues. For the record, I'd vote for either
unifying classes and namespaces (I like that approach)
As do I... Andi,
Stig Venaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
change might be for Apache 2 newer than 2.0.18, but 2.0.18 is the latest
I can find. I think we should support the latest Apache 2 that people are
http://dev.apache.org/dist/
able to download, which
i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class /
namespace ?
echo Foo::CONSTANT;
yes, but how do you define them ?
if it's like this:
namespace Foo;
define(CONSTANT, 123);
it won't be a problem either because then a class can't contain such a
definition (yet) and
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, Harald Radi wrote:
yes, but how do you define them ?
if it's like this:
namespace Foo;
define(CONSTANT, 123);
it won't be a problem either because then a class can't contain such a
definition (yet) and there won't be any ambiguities too.
That's how I was thinking
Folks,
I am relatively new to PHP MySQL. I took on a side project some months
ago which I now realize is over my head. The project is a real estate
catalog. I adapted the catalog system from Welling and Thomson's PHP
MySQL Web Development from SAMS.
I really need to wrap this project up.
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 06:19:01PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
i don't either, but how else will you bind constants to a class /
namespace ?
echo Foo::CONSTANT;
yes, but how do you define them ?
if it's like this:
namespace Foo;
define(CONSTANT, 123);
On perhaps optionally:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: linux 2.4.10 debian/testing
PHP version: 4.0CVS-2001-10-01
PHP Bug Type: XSLT related
Bug description: random segfaults with sablotron 0.70
so i updated to sablotron 0.70 and now i get a lot of random and not easily
reproduceable
ID: 13483
Updated by: sander
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Mail related
Operating System:
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
===User input===
The script I am testing:
?
$recipient = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
$subject = Subject;
$message = Message;
$header =
ID: 13483
Updated by: sander
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Feedback
Status: Open
Bug Type: Mail related
Operating System:
PHP Version: 4.0.6
Previous Comments:
[2001-09-28 16:12:55] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can
Web scripting language, I think that the chances of people
expecting this
I use it as a system scripting language and vote +1 for numeric arguments
to
work the expected way.
I want to use it as a system programming language. But fork() is missing :)
Anyway this shows we use php for many
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Lenar wrote:
I want to use it as a system programming language. But fork() is missing :)
Fork is not missing, pctnl_fork is the name iirc.
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 10:08:02 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
For the record, I'd vote for either
unifying classes and namespaces (I like that approach), or failing that,
using :::.
+1
- Martin
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I think ::: is actually pretty good.
We should keep this option open.
Andi
At 04:36 PM 10/1/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Stupid suggestion, is ::: (three colons) pushing it?
Zeev
At 16:29 01-10-01, John Parker wrote:
'/' is the only operator I can think of that seems to make any sense
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: linux (mandrake 2.4.8-24mdk)
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: IMAP related
Bug description: imap_open fails to authenticate
PHP 4.06 Code which works on apache 1.3.2 on Win2k fails on linux with the
same versions of PHP and apache.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux 2.4
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: Filesystem function related
Bug description: copy() gives incorrect open_basedir() errors
It appears that copy() is overprotective of open_basedir restrictions.
At the web
I noticed this, too, but my backtraces looked much different. (My PHP
version was 4.0.8dev, though, if that makes that much of a difference.)
I'm having a tough time tracking down a script to reproduce the segfault.
90% of the time, everything seems fine, but now and again, apache dies.
Our
Forgot to mention, this is showing up in apache's error logs:
httpd: hash.cpp:249: const Str HashTable::getKey (long unsigned int)
const: Assertion `p' failed.
I took a look at the Sablotron source, but I'm not overly familiar with it.
Maybe on the weekend I can get into it a bit more.
J
Does anyone object to me modifying the anoncvs.php webpage to include
the following note? Does anyone have anything to add - Jeroen? :)
There's a typo in it, but that's not what you meant :-)
I wouldn't name that SuSE thing, it's way to specific for indicating that
something DOESN'T work. I'd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: AIX 4.3.3
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: *Configuration Issues
Bug description: --with-iodbc, --with-ibm-db2 doesn't work together when using
./configure
When proceeding to use the './configure' command and include the 2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Linux 2.4.6 - Debian
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: *Graphics related
Bug description: ImageTTFText double-strikes text
When I specify an absolute path to a font with ImageTTFText, such as
$DOCUMENT_ROOT/fonts/verdana.ttf, it
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: W2K Server
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: Reproducible crash
Bug description: mscvrt.dll error
Win2K Server
PHP 4.0.6
php.exe dated June 22, 2001 2:58 p.m.
I'm getting this error when I try to execute php.exe from a dos
Full name: Alex Waugh
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID:alexwaugh
Purpose: Changes for RISC OS port and new SAPI module
ext/mysql, ext/standard, sapi, TSRM, Zend
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Not sure what discussion has been done on this subject before, but here it
goes.
I wan't to be able to use a function that does the same thing as include,
except instead of passing a file name I pass the actual string to be
processed. This differs from eval() because the string may be all HTML.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Windows 2000 SP2
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: Compile Failure
Bug description: libmysql LONGLONG conflicts with winnt.h
(I apologize; I suspect this should be sent to the libmysql maintainer, but
half an hour's research has not
There is no problem in getting it to work but the question is if we can do
it in a nice way.
How would eval() know if it's evaling something which should start in a PHP
or HTML context? You'd have to send it another argument. This would start
being a bit ugly.
Is it such a big deal?
Andi
At
Why would we have to pass it another argument? We don't pass an argument to
include() to tell it whether or not it is HTML.
There has to be somesort of mechanism that include is using to parse the
file/execute any PHP inside it. So basically all we would be doing is
elimanting the file I/O
[Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 17:16 01-10-01, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
Quoting Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sigh I step away from the computer for the weekend, and such an
interesting discussion ensues. For the record, I'd vote for either
unifying classes and namespaces (I
ID: 13466
Updated by: sniper
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: MySQL related
Operating System:
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
RTFM: http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-connect.php
The 'walkern' part is assumed to be port/unix socket path.
ID: 13482
Updated by: sniper
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Apache related
Operating System: Linux RH7.1 - 2.4 SMP
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
Does this happen with latest CVS snapshot from http://snaps.php.net/ ?
Previous Comments:
ID: 13484
Updated by: sniper
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Compile Failure
Operating System: HP-UX 11.x
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
Does this happen with latest CVS snapshot from http://snaps.php.net/ ? (there have
been a lot of fixes on the code
ID: 13485
Updated by: sniper
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Compile Failure
Operating System: HP-UX 11.x
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
submitted twice
Previous Comments:
ID: 13487
Updated by: sniper
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Closed
Old Bug Type: PHP options/info functions
Bug Type: Sablotron XSL
Operating System: Mac OS 10.0.4
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
user reported fixed in CVS.
Previous Comments:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system:
PHP version: 4.0.6
PHP Bug Type: Compile Failure
Bug description: The word New alone causes compilation to abort while New_ allows
compile.
###
# POP UP MENU SUB ROUTINE
You had the words New With Warranty in your code, and it wasn't in quotes.
In fact your sprintf doesn't make much sense at all, since there are no %'s
in it.
The keyword new is used for instantiating objects, i.e.
$obj = new class();
If you're going to use strings, put them in quotes:
ID: 13505
Updated by: zak
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old Status: Open
Status: Analyzed
Old Bug Type: Compile Failure
Bug Type: Unknown/Other Function
Operating System:
PHP Version: 4.0.6
Old Assigned To:
Assigned To: zak
New Comment:
New (in any combination of case - i.e. new, NEW, NeW,
Full name: Petr Dusek
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID:pdusek
Purpose: Translating the documentation into Czech
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list
ID: 11895
Updated by: derick
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: ODBC related
Operating System: win2k
PHP Version: 4.0.6
New Comment:
Update by: Chris Vanderschaaf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Derick
I have a similar problem only using NT4 SP 6 , Apache 1.3.20 win32, PHP
4.0.6 cgi
71 matches
Mail list logo
