Re: [PHP-DEV] Language Auto Detection / www.php.net

2003-03-12 Thread James Cox
Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is there any chance that we can revert this annoying feature? > > The translated documentation is always behind and partly lacks > > important information from the english version. I want to read > > the documentation in english (and I am not the only on

[PHP-DEV] upcoming plans for servers

2003-02-26 Thread James Cox
uld not be noticed. If anyone has any further questions, please feel free to email me, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or simply reply to this email. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://imajes.info/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP D

RE: [PHP-DEV] can't get wincvs to ask for login

2003-02-03 Thread James Cox
> Hi, > > I'm trying to commit some changes, and can't get wincvs to log me > in or even > to request a password with pserver. I've changed the username > from cvsread > to cellog. Anyone with wincvs experience know how to make the > stupid thing > work? > Your best bet is to use the CVS win32

RE: [PHP-DEV] roadmap of PHP - where? PHP 5 - when?

2003-01-23 Thread James Cox
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Kalowsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I've heard the arguments for the list, and I can only say they are > valid reasons. But you're now making PHP a political project rather > than a software project. Thanks. This is the sort of thing I don't > want to

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP4 + PHP5

2003-01-14 Thread James Cox
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500 > > > "Mike Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4 > > > > a

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] 'php4' CVS module for PHP 5?

2003-01-14 Thread James Cox
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote: > > > > > it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so, > > libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once > libphp5.so > > gets building properly and we have moved onto that track comp

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP4 + PHP5

2003-01-13 Thread James Cox
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500 > "Mike Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hiya, > > > > I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4 > > and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver, similar to the > > way we could use both PHP3 and PHP4. > > I hope so. libphp5

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] 'php4' CVS module for PHP 5?

2003-01-13 Thread James Cox
> Hello, > > What do you think about the idea of Martin that would use > libphp.so > and not libphp5.so ? > it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so, libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once libphp5.so gets building properly and we have moved ont

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
or similar would also be trivial, i think. -- james > -Original Message- > From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:16 PM > To: James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Php-Dev > Subject: Re: cvs checkout skip d

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
2003 5:02 PM > To: James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Php-Dev > Subject: Re: cvs checkout skip dir > > > > I am actually pondering about removing distrobutions from phpweb, and > moving > > it to it's own cvs module, with slightly more heavie

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
I am actually pondering about removing distrobutions from phpweb, and moving it to it's own cvs module, with slightly more heavier control over it. This is to be a bit more secure over releases, and also it is usually not needed during a checkout of phpweb. (if you're going to checkout phpweb, you'

Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2003-01-01 Thread James Cox
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 08:21, Wez Furlong wrote: > Is there some magic that needs to be done to rotate the ChangeLog? > By this I mean: > > gzip ChangeLog > mv ChangeLog.gz ChangeLog2002.gz > touch ChangeLog > cvs add -kb ChangeLog2002.gz > cvs ci -m "rotate changelog" ChangeLog ChangeLog2002.gz >

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS mangled (netware/apachecore.imp,netware/bisonflexzend.bat)

2003-01-01 Thread James Cox
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 08:17, Wez Furlong wrote: > % cvs -q up > cvs server: nothing known about netware/apachecore.imp > cvs server: nothing known about netware/bisonflexzend.bat > > I can't find any trace of these files in my checkout (or in the CVS > files), so I presume that something has been

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] Not able to check-in files - Need help!

2002-12-19 Thread James Cox
Ananth, I just checked the cvs server and also did a test commit -- it looks fine, worked for me. I suggest trying again, and if you have the same problem, try sending me the log message directly (although, i suspect it's an exact copy of what you pasted already). Thanks, James On Fri, 2002-

[PHP-DEV] test, please disregard.

2002-12-05 Thread James Cox
-- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with commit

2002-12-05 Thread James Cox
um.. ok.. i'm looking into a few issues with cvs right now... could you send me the full content of any header etc you might have received, anything that suggests what triggered that error... -- james > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursda

RE: [PHP-DEV] LXR on pear/PECL

2002-12-01 Thread James Cox
Sure, once LXR moves to a new machine i'll make that work. Thanks, James > -Original Message- > From: Joao Prado Maia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] LXR on pear/PECL > > > Hi, > > I'm not sure who i

RE: [PHP-DEV] New vpopmail extension for PHP

2002-11-28 Thread James Cox
it's not orphaned, i'm nursing it back to life :) -- james > -Original Message- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:53 PM > To: Rui Barreiros > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New vpopmail extension for PHP > > > vp

RE: [PHP-DEV] ZE2 question

2002-11-28 Thread James Cox
it means double colon in hebrew... i think Zeev and Andi must not have known what to call it in english when they put it in... but hey, it was the first i18n'ized error message :) -- jamess > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 2

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
>Also, from a management point of view (I manage programmers), >what you are describing there can work in some cases but what >if a programmer forgets/is-too-lazy to to that? I don't want >to wait for the next morning to know about it. > if a programmer is too lazy to test, fire th

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
> > In Real Life [Patent Pending], if you cripple your production site > in the middle of the night then go to bed, you won't have to worry > about any of this because you'd be unemployed in the morning. +1... don't commit code without QA! > > I agree with Derick's assessment. > > I always have th

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
systems -- eg, for 404. -- james > -Original Message- > From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:15 PM > To: James Cox > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] error handling &g

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
did you forget to return http 500 in the sapis? -- james > -Original Message- > From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:56 AM > To: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error > > > > Okay... > > Well, e

RE: [PHP-DEV] GIF support

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
guys, how about we just like leave this for a couple of months till 2003 when the patent runs out? -- james > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Stefan Esser > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DE

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
ED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:17 PM > To: James Cox > Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling > > > The problem with this is that the 500 error does not provide any > information about the error. > > Which for me

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
it can; 500 means server error -- perl, cgi, mod_include, etc all do it, so why shouldn't php? -- james > -Original Message- > From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:06 PM > To: 'James Cox' > Cc: 'PHP

RE: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/bcmath bcmath.c /ext/bcmath/libbcmath/src bcmath.h init.c output.c raise.c raisemod.c recmul.c sqrt.c str2num.c zero.c

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
well. the cvs log for these files show Zeev deleted them 3 years ago (after removing the content). They were GPL'ed, so clearly deleting them was the only option... number.c 1.7 zeev3 yearsWe'll have to live without these files somehow. number.h 1.5 zeev3 yearsWe'l

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Support for Birdstep RDM Server database engine

2002-11-17 Thread James Cox
fwiw, i have also meddled with birdstep slightly, by making the namechange from velocis to birdstep. I agree with Dan -- i think it should be pecl'ed, and perhaps not so reliant on the odbc stuff -- that whole extension is just confusing. That said, Dan is the best person to work on with this.

[PHP-DEV] PHP Rsync

2002-11-17 Thread James Cox
All, After a lot of tweaking, rsync is now back up and ready to rock. there are still going to be some teething errors, due to phpdoc errors, but i will be working with the phpdoc team to iron these out. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-14 Thread James Cox
> At 16:49 12.11.2002, Jon Parise wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote: > > > > > Yes when i introduce a problem with win32 build i have to wait > > > up to 4 hours until i can see the problem and try to fix it. Then > > > i have to wait 4 more hours to see whther

[PHP-DEV] manual notes

2002-11-13 Thread James Cox
The manual notes should be live again. i dry rsynced phpweb on www so it contains all the latest updates. we are just now finalizing the manual builds so the whole thing can get switched on properly. - - james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
Ilia, be my guest... -- james > -Original Message- > From: Ilia A. [mailto:ilia@;prohost.org] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:30 PM > To: Edin Kadribasic; James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > Php-Dev > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps > > > Well there are a

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
of course, all this can be achieved with some simple apache magic... -- james > On Monday 11 November 2002 23:20, Ilia A. wrote: > > > Nice format but it doesn't sort well in directory listings :) > > > > True, but we only have about a dosen files and with a human > readable format > > direct

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
I can certainly set this up. any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date) -- james > > Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours > and use a time format that displays the timezone? > > marcus > > At 00:34 11.11.2002, James Cox wro

RE: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken?

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
Changelog does seem to be broken, and it's on our list of things to do. Thanks, James > -Original Message- > From: Steve Alberty [mailto:staybyte@;php.net] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken? > > > Hi, > > the Cha

[PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-10 Thread James Cox
Snaps are back! The snapserver is back up and alive, with both unix and win32 snaps... -- james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/&

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-08 Thread James Cox
> > > > > Historically, I have been against mbstring being enabled by default. > > My feelings towards anything being enabled by default, unless it is > > considered core functionality, is pretty negative though. > > The reasoning to consider a extension as a part of core, is prone > to be obscure.

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-07 Thread James Cox
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote: > > > To make php be easier usable in non US-ASCII (127chars) environments > > especially those requiring UCS-2, UTF-8 or other any character mapping > > other than iso-8859-1 or -15 we should more likly try to > integrate mbstring > > fully in php. As

RE: [PHP-DEV] apache_hooks

2002-11-02 Thread James Cox
I think we could produce a snap of this by checking out normally, and then checking out apache_hooks into it, so the files it affects would go to the right tag... (etc etc). I'd be happy to do this when i set up snaps again. -- james > > What do you think would be the best way to make the apach

[PHP-DEV] Rsync and Snaps

2002-11-02 Thread James Cox
rsync) you may wish to comment them out to reduce server noise. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe,

RE: [PHP-DEV] hebrew patch for jewish calendar

2002-10-30 Thread James Cox
Derick, everyone else seemed to get this patch as an attachment... -- james > -Original Message- > From: moshe doron [mailto:mosdoron@;netvision.net.il] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] hebrew patch for jewish calendar > > > i a

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Unsigned Problems Revisited

2002-10-30 Thread James Cox
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect <<< to work too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain it properly. -- james > > I think you guys have convinced me that having >>> only isn't too bad > (Jason will kill me now). > Does anyone here on php-dev ha

RE: [PHP-DEV] The reason the way it is: About flushing... Please read and comment.

2002-10-23 Thread James Cox
i think it's really quite simple.. be able to allow the developer the freedom to make their own mind up. As Harmut pointed out, some cli stuff needs implicit flushing. Other stuff doesn't -- i have many php scriptlets which do tasks for me that sh can't quite handle (or i don't know how to do it i

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [4.3] Current critical bugs

2002-10-18 Thread James Cox
What actual patch did you add to ap2filter? -- james > -Original Message- > From: Ryo Takagi [mailto:rt@;takagi-ryo.ac] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:41 AM > To: Yasuo Ohgaki > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrei Zmievski > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [4.3] Current crit

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Apache 2 & incorrect 304 response to "If-Modified-Since"

2002-10-14 Thread James Cox
I don't particularly like the look of this patch... we should fix 304's properly... > > > > --- sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c~ Fri Aug 16 07:27:03 2002 > > +++ sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c Mon Oct 14 23:27:26 2002 > > @@ -558,14 +558,24 @@ > > return OK; > > } > > > > +static

RE: [PHP-DEV] Funny guys...

2002-10-13 Thread James Cox
> were there any problems with the cvs server yesterday? In my commit > from yesterday morning i added the line pp++, this was commited as > p++. In my file on the harddisk there is clearly a pp++ and NOT a p++. > (Which makes no sense anyway) > commit message states... - i

RE: [PHP-DEV] Scratching the 4.3 branch

2002-10-06 Thread James Cox
> > Btw, it will be very usefull if someone can add $id and a little > > TODO inside the gd source :-))) > > I am very tempted to clean up the GD source. I hate the way it is > formatted. Nothing has happened since March 2001 from the Boutell folks > despite numerous bug patches sent their way.

RE: [PHP-DEV] sticky perms in CVS?

2002-09-23 Thread James Cox
nope. > > But aren't all the other files -rw-r--r-- ? > > On 09/23/02, "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The perms are fine in cvs: > > > > -r--r--r-- 1 cvs cvs 24388 Sep 23 14:18 user_streams.c,v > > > > -- PH

RE: [PHP-DEV] sticky perms in CVS?

2002-09-23 Thread James Cox
The perms are fine in cvs: -r--r--r-- 1 cvs cvs 24388 Sep 23 14:18 user_streams.c,v -- james > > My umask is 022 (and I've never changed it, not since my early uni days > on those old SGI Indigos when I was paranoid). > I'm wondering if somehow the file was originally created > read-only

RE: [PHP-DEV] Thread Reading

2002-09-19 Thread James Cox
> At 20:10 19/09/2002, Adam Voigt wrote: > >Newbie's or people seeking help with bad security > >standards, could give away the password to there SQL server, etc. > >Maybe the phps parser or whatever it's called should automatically *** > >out the password fields of all the db, ftp, etc. calls. >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Thread Reading

2002-09-18 Thread James Cox
I agree. Lets jsut get this in the tree.. -- james > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:28:35AM +0100, Dan Hardiker wrote : > > This doesnt demonstrate the use of the show_source (or other aliased) > > function, but I assure you - it works similarly with an optional > > parameter, defaulting to cur

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request:

2002-09-10 Thread James Cox
the 'flood' of cvs requests aren't an attack of sorts, they are simply all coming at once because the smtp server on www.php.net was turned off for a while. do not be alarmed! :) -- james -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.ph

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread James Cox
> For the benefit of other users i did a status check on the > general situation with extensions: > >Total extensions bundled with PHP4.2.3 = 94 ># of them that are Expermintal = 24 > > Therefore more than 25% are expermental. > > Among the experimental. > > Experimental for 1

RE: [PHP-DEV] ADT CVS Commits

2002-09-09 Thread James Cox
> > I'm trying to get [EMAIL PROTECTED] created to automate this process, > if the new mailing lists aren't created by tonight I'll go ahead > and manually > make the changes :) > Done. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Problems with PHP.net MX

2002-09-08 Thread James Cox
we're fine. I believe the mx is happy again. > > Nice news. We are 1 day later, still no mail. I would like to repeat again > that If you need a hoster, I'm available. > > -- > > Nicos - CHAILLAN Nicolas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.WorldAKT.com - Hébergement de sites Internet > > "Jim Winstead" <[E

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: #19286 [NEW]: header() Control Char Injection

2002-09-07 Thread James Cox
> Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > This obvious security risk is mentioned in bugtraq today. > > > > IMHO, this is users' fault. They must check values before > > using it. In this specfic case, user should use simple regex > > before feeding str to header(). > > > > Any opinion to meke this to "won't fix

RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs

2002-09-06 Thread James Cox
riday, September 06, 2002 4:25 PM > To: James Cox > Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf; Markus Fischer; Dan Kalowsky; Devon O'Dell; php-dev > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs > > > Just a thought: > Why not make mail list for the websites and send a mail for those to > that

RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs

2002-09-06 Thread James Cox
agreed, although I can't do much to it, i have had a look. -- james > > In our case, nobody would check the logs. Easier to let users read them > for us and let us know. Sounds like something is fishy with the new MySQL > 4 setup we are using on the new server. > > -Rasmus > > On Fri, 6 Sep 20

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/xml xml.c

2002-09-06 Thread James Cox
efore we started > to commit changes, we had gone through > http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php and other related > document. Is there something else we need to know? > > Please clarify. > > Thanks, > Ananth. > > >>> "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [PHP-DEV] http://www.php-con.com/

2002-09-05 Thread James Cox
Andrey, this has nothing to do with php-dev ... php-dev is just for the development of PHP ... as in, PHP internals... -- james > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Hristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 1:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-03 Thread James Cox
So, lets summarize what we got out of this... -- mbstring is a very useful part of PHP and should be integrated properly into ext/standard . -- mbstring-enc-trans has some issues, but that's ok because you can't disable-and-not-build it at build time now -- having default packages is ok, but w

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:51 AM > To: James Cox > Cc: Rui Hirokawa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, James Cox wrote: >

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > No, this option is 'disabled' by default, and can be enabled by a > ini variable. > > mbstring.encoding_translation = Off; is default. > > If mbstring.encoding_translation = On is set in php.ini, > the transparent conversion will be enabled. > ok, but before, you had to --enable it before it'd

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > I think that the problem is caused by > --enable-mbstr-enc-trans option and is not caused by mbstring itself. > > If --enable-mbstr-enc-trans is enabled, > php_treat_data, the original handler of user input (POST/GET/Cookie), > is overrided by mbstr_treat_data in ext/mbstring , > the multibyte

RE: [PHP-DEV] Default extensions (was: mbstring)

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world where > sysadmins know how to read and listen to their users > requests. That's why mysql for example is enabled by default. > (or that's the main reasoning behind it at least) > > And we can't educate people or force them to an

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > At 22:52 02/09/2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote: > >On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > > > > If we should reduce number of modules built by default, 1st > > > module should be MySQL. Removing MySQL does not cause any > > > technical problems at all. > > > >I'll agree to that as well. +1 on

RE: [PHP-DEV] wassup with master.php

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
GroupAKT.com - Hébergement Group. > www.WorldAKT.com - Hébergement de sites Internet > "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > if you'd been paying attention, you would have noticed that the machine > it's > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] wassup with master.php

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
if you'd been paying attention, you would have noticed that the machine it's on is down right now. -- james > > Hi, > > is someone working on master.php.net or what? > > -- > Merci de nous avoir choisi. - Thanks you for your choice. > Nicos - CHAILLAN Nicolas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> >> P.S. > >> Offtopic sorry > > > > funny things are allowed as off topic posts :) > > > > Derick > > Such as Derick's cross dressing tendancies? heh :P [sorry, couldnt resist] > > Where the hell did that come from? :) -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, vi

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> Back to the topic... > > When will the MX be up again? > The box actually hasn't died yet. SSH and SMTP are open, and seem to be listening -- it is possible to make a connection to them. For some reason however... ssh doesn't auth, and then times out... so there are probably a bunch of defunc

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > This goes to everyone who has root or sudo on the boxes.. for > example i'll > > get paged if something gets broken. This should guarentee a faster > response > > time (although, php-dev works too :)) > > Wow. I guess your pager does not stand still a second then... :) > Well, it works as

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, James Cox wrote: > > JC>>> Still, I think it makes more sense to enable, not disable. > What extensions are enabled by default anyhow? I am not aware of > a list. Perhaps that's why i get odd errors when working with > php, because t

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> > As I see it, PHP was designed with speed and simplicity in > mind. Having the > > burden of a large number of extra modules compiled in by default doesn't > > help, and deviates from this path. > > No, you can always disable those extensions. The default extensions were > *voted* in for

[PHP-DEV] RE:

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> -Original Message- > From: > Sent: None > Subject: > > > Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 06:42:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Sterling > Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-P

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
> At 13:19 02/09/2002, James Cox wrote: > >As I see it, PHP was designed with speed and simplicity in mind. > > It was indeed.. > > >Having the burden of a large number of extra modules compiled in by > >default doesn't help, and deviates from this path. &

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
Wez, lets loose the crap here. I am happy to see mbstring in PHP! I have used it too, when I needed multibyte support. But you see, it's not really all that solid. It needs more work (hence this apparent development outside of php.net). All I am saying is that we should disable it by default

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
james > -Original Message- > From: James Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:53 AM > To: Andrey Hristov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net > > > some of the httpd processes went defunct (also, becau

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
some of the httpd processes went defunct (also, because rotatelogs did) . http://www.php.net/server-status -- works now. :) -- james > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Hristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:39 AM > To: Andrey Hristov; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
Derick pretty much said it for me... but more explicitly, mbstring isn't stable enough to be default. -- james > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 6:41 AM > To: Masaki Fujimoto > Cc: James C

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
> > So I want to 'disable' it by default. If you want encoding, > just enable it. But you're right, i've never needed to create a > truely globalized/localized app. (and from general principles, if > you feel you need to localize any more than your ui/strings.) > > > > That's not what I read,

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
> > I vote to remove mbstring as a default module. > > I guess you have never tried to create a truely globalized/localized > application then? > > I'm -1 on removing it, because PHP needs a consistent charset encoding > API that is portable across platforms. iconv and recode are "no good" > be

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
> I do have one request, when the time comes to remove it from the > default also change the PHP core code so that it can be built as a > shared extension and loaded on the fly. Currently it can only be > compiled into PHP statically and building it as .so means hacking the > PHP source and

[PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
ll, the converse is true. Let us STOP burdening default builds with crap that is unlikely to be used. -- james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.ph

[PHP-DEV] I'm Back

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
For those who may be interested, I am back from my trip to California, and am going through mails. --James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <h

Re: [PHP-DEV] Accounts on Alpha/Tru64

2002-08-15 Thread James Cox
"Sebastian Nohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm currently trying to get a machine for testing PHP on Tru64/Alpha. > Anyone who is _really_ interested in testing AND hunting bugs on that > platform should drop me a mail. http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/ __

RE: [PHP-DEV] [Win32] php.ini not found

2002-08-09 Thread James Cox
does php-cli.ini exist anywhere? -- james > -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Win32] php.ini not found > > > Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > Using strace I fo

RE: [PHP-DEV] 0 size snaps?

2002-08-02 Thread James Cox
This should be fixed. -- James > Sebastian Nohn schrieb: > > > http://snaps.php.net/php4-200207311500.tar.gz > > http://snaps.php.net/php4-200207311500.tar.bz2 > > > > And alle the -latested + the last STABLE Files have 0 > > size. > > The snaps are still broken and the last one is still fro

RE: [PHP-DEV] Scripts running on two different browsers crashes the server

2002-07-31 Thread James Cox
> Please note that I am using the PHP development version 4.0.8. > Ananth, Can I ask why you guys are using such an old version of PHP? Thanks, James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.2.3RC1 ?

2002-07-28 Thread James Cox
> Following that, why not do what a number of people do, and do > > major.minor.patch > > major releases say every 6 months > minor ones every 2 - unless serious patch required > patches as required > > This allows people to predict the times also. > i would see this working, given it's what we do

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.2.3RC1 ?

2002-07-28 Thread James Cox
the large amount of time between the branches. > > Yes. That may be. But there are a lot of bugfixes in the latest > STABLE-snapshot I tested (26/07/02) - or exactly: All bugs I experienced > were fixed. So the easiest thing would be to cancel all new features that > were planned for 4.2.3 and mo

RE: [PHP-DEV] beginner question: how to execute unix command in PHP

2002-07-23 Thread James Cox
> > Hi, I'm just starting to learn PHP. I couldn't find how to exec unix > command and read the result. Basically, I just want to execute "ls -lrt" > and read and display the output. > > This may be very simple question, but for some reason, I couldn't find any > info on executing unix command

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Security Advisory: Vulnerability in PHP versions 4.2.0 and 4.2.1

2002-07-22 Thread James Cox
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rouvas Stathis wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Just wanting to notify everyone that > > the link for the PHP.4.2.2 download is broken. > > From which mirror, and how does your link look like? > it's fixed. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubs

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: bobo

2002-07-15 Thread James Cox
Actually, Jason will be a primary contact at Rackshack for us (providing a new server), so is signing up to be able to help us out (and so he has a email address for peopel to mail him about this too). he just got in a bit early. :) -- james > > James Cox said I should sign up for one,

RE: [PHP-DEV] "MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR" redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
> > After updating to autoconf 2.53 I get the following warnings: > > sb@wopr-mobile:/usr/src/php4> ./buildconf > using default Zend directory > buildconf: checking installation... > buildconf: autoconf version 2.53 (ok) > buildconf: automake version 1.5 (ok) > buildconf:

RE: [PHP-DEV] "MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR" redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
> Jani Taskinen wrote: > > Your build stuff (gcc 3.1 installation done wrong?) is shitnitz. > > Hm, how come everything else works fine? > this seems to be a problem with the MySQL build, not ours - they need to wrap their MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR definition around an #ifndef so if a previous configure

RE: [PHP-DEV] "MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR" redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
can you email me a copy of your php_config.h and config.log, please? -- james > -Original Message- > From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] "MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR" redefined > > > In file includ

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Small CGI Serve

2002-06-19 Thread James Cox
> > I have found if you set the environment var "REDIRECT_STATUS" to "FALSE" > then it works > > Someone explain? > > > > Having finally found out how to pass the Environment vars onto PHP, I am > > stumpted to find that PHP wasn't reading them and putting them in their > > place (GET vars). > > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS fails to compile (ext/mysql)

2002-06-18 Thread James Cox
This would likely be me. what OS? can you give me a copy of config.log and php_config.h ? Thanks, -- James -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Does (will?) php support BerkeleyDB4 yet?

2002-06-15 Thread James Cox
> hi, > > is BerkelyDB4 supported in 5.8.0RC1? > > i note that -with-db has been deprecated, and that only -with-db2, > -with-db3 and -with-dbm remain .. > > thanks for any comments/pointers. Hey, could i get a copy of 5.8.0RC1 please? -- james -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-EVANGELISM] ANN: QA & Evangelism Call to Arms @ LinuxTag

2002-06-06 Thread James Cox
When everyone gets into linuxtag, we can work out the best time for a meeting and take it from there, i think. -- james ___ This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.co.uk -- PHP Development Mailing List

  1   2   >