In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:15:43PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> Yes, that's why it is needed - though I'm surprised if this problem is
> unique to the linker used on Linux.
[...]
> I'm fairly sure I've had problems on IRIX before when the linker picks
> up libraries with
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:06:57PM +0800, James Devenish wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:52:15AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
...
> > On a lib64 system, if you do have the 32-bit libraries installed in
> > /usr/lib, but want to compile against the 64-bit libraries in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:52:15AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> /usr/lib64 exists so that you can have 64-bit libraries installed
> alongside 32-bit libraries in /usr/lib - this is a precedent that comes
> from Sun or SGI or somewhere I believe.
Yep, HP-UX does it, too.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:27:05PM +0800, James Devenish wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:25:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Hi, I've got a bunch of fixes for systems which have system libraries in
> > /usr/lib64 rather than /usr/lib - these are needed for some
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:25:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> Hi, I've got a bunch of fixes for systems which have system libraries in
> /usr/lib64 rather than /usr/lib - these are needed for some upcoming
> 64-bit Linux ports. These fixes are based on patches from Su
Hi, I've got a bunch of fixes for systems which have system libraries in
/usr/lib64 rather than /usr/lib - these are needed for some upcoming
64-bit Linux ports. These fixes are based on patches from SuSE
developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Should I submit changes to ext/*/config.
