At 10:42 PM 2/6/2002, Robinson, Mike wrote:
>I reckon we've been through all this before.
>Closing the list in any way is just a bad idea.
It's just that never before did we lose actual contributors over people who
make nothing but noise. Now it is happening.
Zeev
--
PHP Development Mailin
Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] Lists
I reckon we've been through all this before.
Closing the list in any way is just a bad idea.
Mike Robinson
IT/Developer - Torstar Media Group Television
Phone: 416.945.8786 Fax: 416.869.4566
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message
I'm afraid php-dev-spam may become a bit more popular than you think :)
At 06:58 PM 2/6/2002, Gary Benson wrote:
>I've been thinking about this. What is really needed is some way to send
>automated 'get lost' messages without requiring a list moderator. These
>messages have got to be real easy t
I've been thinking about this. What is really needed is some way to send
automated 'get lost' messages without requiring a list moderator. These
messages have got to be real easy to send to make this work.
How about this: set up a list (php-dev-spam, say) that isn't archived or
advertised any
> Umm while this sounds like a good idea initially, why are you trying to
> make PHP a closed development project? This maneuver will make it lots
> more difficult to get any new developers in on the project, and for those
> with one time questions to pose them.
>
> A moderated list might be a
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> John Donagher wrote:
> > This has probably been mentioned before, but I think the naming of php-dev is
> > way misleading. It's funny that people get so ripped when someone sends an
> > off-topic question to this list. Someone who doesn't read the
John Donagher wrote:
> This has probably been mentioned before, but I think the naming of php-dev is
> way misleading. It's funny that people get so ripped when someone sends an
> off-topic question to this list. Someone who doesn't read the descriptions may
> very well take php-dev to mean PHP de
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 15:34, John Donagher wrote:
>
> This has probably been mentioned before, but I think the naming of php-dev is
> way misleading. It's funny that people get so ripped when someone sends an
> off-topic question to this list. Someone who doesn't read the descriptions may
> very
This has probably been mentioned before, but I think the naming of php-dev is
way misleading. It's funny that people get so ripped when someone sends an
off-topic question to this list. Someone who doesn't read the descriptions may
very well take php-dev to mean PHP development. This is ambiguous
I completely agree with Dan on these points. If you don't want to see
certain types of posts, or posts from certain people, you are a simple
procmail rule away from getting rid of them. Making php-dev a closed list
is a horrible idea.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
>
>
>
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, James Cox wrote:
> I ask a simple question:
>
> how many more unsubscribed hard working developers does it take before we
> realise that we need to ban certain people, and make php-dev (or it's
> brother) subscribers only, and closed subscription?
Umm while this sounds like
I ask a simple question:
how many more unsubscribed hard working developers does it take before we
realise that we need to ban certain people, and make php-dev (or it's
brother) subscribers only, and closed subscription?
- We need a place for developer discussion which is not interupted by user
12 matches
Mail list logo
