'lo there,
given the recent benchmark discussion on this list and my stumbling
over Parrot last night (that comes with MOPS benchmark scripts for a
variety of scripting languages), I ran a quick test:
Language | Elapsed time | MOPS
--+
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> PHP | 158 seconds | 1.27
Now I'm even more surprised:
PHP (Zend Engine 2) | 177 seconds | 1.13
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: htt
Hello Sebastian,
PIII 2x800 Linux 2.4.16-SMP php-4.1.1(cgi)
W/O ZendOptimizer
Iterations:1
Estimated ops: 2
Elapsed time: 219
M op/s:0.91324200913242
With ZendOptimizer
Iterations:1
Estimated ops: 2
Elapsed time: 94
M op/s:2.127659574468
Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
> Can you send me this test-suite ?
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/perlcvs login
(Just hit Enter at password prompt)
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/perlcvs co parrot
parrot/examples/mops/ is what you're looking for.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
htt
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> given the recent benchmark discussion on this list and my stumbling
> over Parrot last night (that comes with MOPS benchmark scripts for a
> variety of scripting languages), I ran a quick test:
Updated table:
Language | Elapsed time | MOPS
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:47:08 +0100
Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > given the recent benchmark discussion on this list and my stumbling
> > over Parrot last night (that comes with MOPS benchmark scripts for a
> > variety of scripting languages),
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Updated table:
>
> Language | Elapsed time | MOPS
> --+--+--
Parrot 0.0.3 | 7 seconds | 26.99
> Python| 88 seconds | 2.27
> Perl | 102 seconds | 1.
I wouldn't pay too much attention to anything in version 0.0.3. The Zend
engine was quicker than Perl at this kind of stuff during initial stages of
development, but as more features and functionality are added, it became
slower.
That said - if you're using PHP because of performance, you're
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I wouldn't pay too much attention to anything in version 0.0.3.
Of course.
> The Zend engine was quicker than Perl at this kind of stuff during
> initial stages of development, but as more features and
> functionality are added, it became slower.
I understand this, a
At 04:59 PM 1/1/2002 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I don't mind PHP to be slower than Perl or Python that much. But what
> I would not mind would be the Zend Engine 2 beeing slower than the
> Zend Engine 1...
That's pretty weird. I ran the same script and they are pretty much the
same
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> That's pretty weird.
Benchmarks usually are. Just to make it clear: I did one run for each
language / configuration only. No multiple iterations to get a mean
value. That alone disqualifies my test results.
> I ran the same script and they are pretty much the same whi
Hello Sebastian,
Language | Elapsed time (sec)| MOPS
--+---+-
Python| 96.5 | 2.07
Perl | 94 | 2.13
PHP (+ ZendOptimizer) | 94 | 2.13
PHP
12 matches
Mail list logo
