Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-27 Thread George Schlossnagle
A little update on all of this. I changed the way that the handlers are created in the apache config from php_value uri_handler /tmp/foo.php to phpUriHandler /tmp/foo.php and logically separated them from the ini structure. This eliminates some unnecessary work that was being done before and

[PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread George Schlossnagle
Here's an incremental patch on Lukas' patch which tries to address a couple issues: o The startup sequence has been changed to allow for post-data to make it through if any hooks before full post-data is read are called o works under register_globals Off ($request is now available in the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
I say commit it. This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in its own branch. You are not going to destabilize anything. (I just made sure you had enough karma for the commit) -Rasmus On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote: Here's an incremental patch on Lukas' patch which

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread George Schlossnagle
All of this work was off HEAD. Should a new_apache_hooks branch be tagged? Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: I say commit it. This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in its own branch. You are not going to destabilize anything. (I just made sure you had enough karma for the commit) -Rasmus

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
I think if we put this in 4.3 we are going to delay 4.3 even further. Although, I suppose if we are careful and make sure we #ifdef it nicely and only turn it on with a configure option, we can put it in HEAD. So, is your patch my apache_hooks stuff + Lukas's work and then your stuff on top? On

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread George Schlossnagle
I wasn't proposing putting it in HEAD, just that the work was done against HEAD not against your apache_hooks. Lukas redid all the php-apache request object work fresh off of head, and I made changes off of that, so it contains nothing from your apache_hooks branch. Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Well, the problem with doing it on a branch, the way I did, and as Lukas found out, is that it goes rather stale after a while. So I guess that I am actually proposing putting it in HEAD but #ifdef'ed out and perhaps not even providing a user-visible config option for it yet. You'd need to set

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread derick
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Yeah, but the point, at least for now is that the code really isn't meant to even be used by QA folks yet. It is work targeted for PHP 5. hmm... starting with a PHP5 branch would be a little early now don't you think? Well, after 4.3.0 is branched

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Yeah, but the point, at least for now is that the code really isn't meant to even be used by QA folks yet. It is work targeted for PHP 5. hmm... starting with a PHP5 branch would be a little early now don't you think? Yup - hence the confusion

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Lukas Schroeder
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:18:38AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Well, after 4.3.0 is branched I guess the next release would be PHP 5 so it's not that far away. If only Stig would start with the branch :) Anyway, I'm more in favor of having this nice hook stuff in a seperate branch

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
i offer to do the ugly work. i put it into the branch for now, so i dont even have to think i tiny bit about breaking anything. and if time comes, i'll prepare the necessary patch sets to merge into the php5 branch, without having to use the dreaded cvs merge branch 'feature'. would that

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Lukas Schroeder
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:59:01PM -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote: I actually just made a 'new_apache_hooks' branch and am about to commit it all there argh. so, what now? i don't like having two branches for this. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread George Schlossnagle
If you want to pull everything into the apche_hooks branch, I can do that as well. But if we do that, it would probably wise to update everything in that branch to HEAD. George Schlossnagle wrote: I haven't committed anything yet. It seems like the benefit of starting with a fresh copy

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread George Schlossnagle
Ok, this has all been added to the apache_hooks branch, which is now up-to-date. George Schlossnagle wrote: If you want to pull everything into the apche_hooks branch, I can do that as well. But if we do that, it would probably wise to update everything in that branch to HEAD. George

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

2002-08-26 Thread Edin Kadribasic
Ok, this has all been added to the apache_hooks branch, which is now up-to-date. Very nice. IMHO this should be merged into HEAD as soon as PHP_4_3_0 is branched off. Edin -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php