RE: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-22 Thread Robinson, Mike
Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd) > ok, I give up ;) You're right, if you say, that not sooo many > extensions > should be in the core php4 distribution. It makes the Release process > somehow complicated... But unfortunately the pear-framework is at the

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-22 Thread Christian Stocker
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > So imagemagick would be less popular than, say, Ovrimos, YAZ(eesh), > > SESAM, Crédit Mutuel CyberMUT... > > > no, I don't remember saying these belonged in PHP's CVS, > they are there for a large part imho legacy reasons and laziness >

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 22:17, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > > Well it's taken several years but finally you posted > > > something I don't agree with. :) > > > > Wow, several years, that almost seems too long :) > > Yes, didn't you still walk u

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > Well it's taken several years but finally you posted > > something I don't agree with. :) > > > Wow, several years, that almost seems too long :) Yes, didn't you still walk under the table when it all started? :) -Andrei "The most exciting p

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:58, Robinson, Mike wrote: > Sterling Hughes writes: > > Really, I've *never* come across a piece of code that used > > imagemagick. I think it definitely does have a use, don't get > > me wrong, I'm just doubting that the use is widespread enough to >

RE: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Robinson, Mike
Title: RE: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd) Sterling Hughes writes: >   Really, I've *never* come across a piece of code that used >   imagemagick.  I think it definitely does have a use, don't get >   me wrong, I'm just doubting that the use is widespr

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Christian Stocker
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:27:28 +0100, Sterling Hughes wrote: [snip] > I think perhaps we should in the meantime have a little "repository" > somewhere of extensions (just a list), where imagemagick could be > listed. Also, as you said yourself, currently its very basic, so at

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
> Really, I've *never* come across a piece of code that used > imagemagick. I think it definitely does have a use, don't get > me wrong, I'm just doubting that the use is widespread enough to > be in PHP's cvs currently... IMHO, imagemagick is a powerfull tools. Some of th

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Sterling Hughes
Christian Stocker wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:22:12 +0100, derick wrote: > > >>Let it do to the list then ... >> >> >>>On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Christian Stocker wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Egon Schmid wrote: From: "Christian Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>I wrote

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread Christian Stocker
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:22:12 +0100, derick wrote: > Let it do to the list then ... > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Christian Stocker wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Egon Schmid wrote: >> > >> > From: "Christian Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > >> I wrote further on my ImageMagick extension (

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/imagick update (fwd)

2001-11-21 Thread derick
Let it do to the list then ... > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Christian Stocker wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Egon Schmid wrote: > > > > From: "Christian Stocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> I wrote further on my ImageMagick extension (still a lot missing), but > > >> most importantly i wrote some