2010/2/11 Jim Lucas
> Dasn wrote:
>
>> I got the syntax error. Why?
>>
>
>
only constant literal is allowed.
You can think that it is static complie but not on runtime .
Regards,
Eric,
> Read the first paragraph on the following page.
>
> http://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.propertie
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 06:46 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Op 2/11/10 6:34 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
> >>
> >> 1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
Op 2/11/10 6:34 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
>>
>> 1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
>> 2. you are tackling the problem incorrectly
>>
>> at any rate
*haha* I've removed w3.org from the recipients list... so onwards to the
content below...
Jochem Maas wrote:
Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
From the editor's draft:
"
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the c
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 05:53 +, Jochem Maas wrote:
> whatever it is that your trying to do, it sounds like one of two things:
>
> 1. you have hosting that is unsuitable for your needs
> 2. you are tackling the problem incorrectly
>
> at any rate, as far I'm concerned, you should never have a l
Dasn wrote:
I got the syntax error. Why?
Read the first paragraph on the following page.
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.properties.php
[quote]
... This declaration may include an initialization, but this initialization must be a constant
value--that is, it must be able to be eva
Hello guys, I encountered a syntax error, and cannot figure out the
reason, for example:
== CODE ==
1:'str1'.'str2');
3:?>
===
Works fine, but when I try to put it into a class, say:
==
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:08:42 +1030, james.mcl...@gmail.com (James McLean) wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, wrote:
>> I'm basically familiar with the UNIX permissions - 'owner', 'group', or
>> 'other', but I
>> have no real idea how these apply to webpage users under PHP. I know that if
Op 2/11/10 5:42 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
> Thank you for the hints given. I'll look into the various options given.
> The main reason for the need for a persistent flag in memory is that
> several installations where the PHP code would be deployed do not have
> access to crontab, so I am simulati
did I send the below message? must have been
an artifact of the defacto 'Reply-to-All' on this
mailing list. I dislike this kind of nonsense, It's in no
way stopping SPAM engines and just means more stuff
to be undertaken by real people
prlease, as if a SPAM BOT can't catch this kind of messag
Thank you for the hints given. I'll look into the various options given.
The main reason for the need for a persistent flag in memory is that
several installations where the PHP code would be deployed do not have
access to crontab, so I am simulating crontab's functionality by letting
a PHP script
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:37:39AM +0200, Teus Benschop wrote:
> Good day,
>
> May I ask you, gurus, whether it is possible to set a flag in PHP that
> persists for the duration of the server being switched on?
>
> If the server would be power cycled, the flag would be off. Similarly if
> the we
Op 2/10/10 9:08 PM, Robert Cummings schreef:
> From the editor's draft:
>
> "
> The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
> content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
> element, and which could be considered separate from that content. Such
> secti
Op 2/11/10 4:37 AM, Teus Benschop schreef:
> Good day,
>
> May I ask you, gurus, whether it is possible to set a flag in PHP that
> persists for the duration of the server being switched on?
>
> If the server would be power cycled, the flag would be off. Similarly if
> the web server would be res
Good day,
May I ask you, gurus, whether it is possible to set a flag in PHP that
persists for the duration of the server being switched on?
If the server would be power cycled, the flag would be off. Similarly if
the web server would be restarted the flag would be off also.
I do realize that suc
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:12:01 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>I'm doing quite a bit more work in public sector these days. Recently ne
>department finally did away with IE6 and moved to IE7. Here's what I had
>to do to accomodate this gotcha:
>
> Nothing
>
>See, that was tough. Why was it so h
tedd wrote:
> At 1:38 PM -0500 2/10/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
>> Agreed. Those make sense to demarcate the structure layout of the
>> document... but still, for styling the class makes more sense since it
>> keeps the specificity low and easy to override (especially true for
>> skinnable apps). In
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 19:09 +, Lester Caine wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> > Lester Caine wrote:
> >> Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
> >> have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
> >> somewhat premature!
> >> What is ne
At 1:38 PM -0500 2/10/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Agreed. Those make sense to demarcate the structure layout of the
document... but still, for styling the class makes more sense since
it keeps the specificity low and easy to override (especially true
for skinnable apps). In my experience I've se
From the editor's draft:
"
The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of
content that is tangentially related to the content around the aside
element, and which could be considered separate from that content. Such
sections are often represented as sidebars in printed typogr
Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
"The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
the standard sidebar." - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
Unfortunatley I examined that side quite thorou
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> It took very little work since I was essentially doing that already.
>> aside is the most logical html 5 layout tag for describing
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> "The most common misconception of how this element should be used is for
>> the standard sidebar." - see: http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/
>
> Unfortunatley I examined that side quite thoroughly and got sm
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relat
Brian Dunning wrote:
But I do want to add some level of code obfuscation to prevent them
from making simple changes to my code that allow them to exceed the
privileges they've purchased.
I have used PHP Processor 1.5 from http://gridinsoft.com for this. Back
when I was looking around
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>> Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
> through the document and contextually near to the information to which
> the asi
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar s
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
"aside". Sure it's a
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>>
>> Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
>> through the document and contextually near to the information to which
>> the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
>> "aside". Sure it's aside,
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
"aside". Sure it's aside, but it's not e
Robert Cummings wrote:
Many government documents have the concept of "aside" as appearing
through the document and contextually near to the information to which
the aside relates. The entire sidebar seems a bit gratuitous as an
"aside". Sure it's aside, but it's not exactly the semantic mean
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
allowing IE8 to ins
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when ther
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one element
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and
not IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of
inexperience, inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one eleme
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:56:36PM +1100, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
>
> The interesting things in my websites go on behind-the-scenes, in the PHP,
> and produce
> relatively straightforward HTML. I have avoided the well-known bugs in IE6,
> and think my
> webpages display correctly on any of
That meaning the message? I'll re-send it now:
Try http://www.seekposition.net/php-encode
Ignore everything, just enter the code and check if the code still works.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 10 February 2010 14:33, דניאל דנון wrote:
> > Sent from my mobile de
Robert Cummings wrote:
Just a word of thought... if you're doing styling... use classes and not
IDs. Use of IDs for styling is very often indicative of inexperience,
inability, or lack of understanding with respect to CSS.
I use ID when there will only be one element that needs to be styled
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
What about search engines? Will there be any impact on these,
particularly with regards to semantic content?
I expect semantic markup to (eventually) improve how pages are indexed.
Also, are there any browsers that would fall over with unknown tags? I
know IE use
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Bob McConnell wrote:
>
>> Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
>> Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
>> browsers. It's a l
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > Bob McConnell wrote:
> >
> >> Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
> >> Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
> >> browsers. It's a lot less work
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:20 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Bob McConnell wrote:
>
> >
> > Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
> > Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
> > browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the othe
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
The W3C validator rejects that autocomplete attribute because it still
isn't in any valid standard. Some browsers have introduced it, and PCI
requires it to be there for browsers that recognise it, but it's not a
good security feature, as browsers don't have to honor it
Bob McConnell wrote:
Our SOP is to generate standards compliant pages, validate them with
Firefox and the HTML Validator add-on, then deal with the deviant
browsers. It's a lot less work than trying to do it the other way
around. There are a few minor issues, such as W3C still refusing to
allow
On 10 February 2010 16:31, Pat wrote:
> hi all
> having trouble here with a site that I am hosting on go-daddy
>
> I want to keep my php and my images apart
>
> so to do this I have the base directory which contains the php scripts. On
> the directory above that I have
> my photos stored in /photo
On 10 February 2010 14:33, דניאל דנון wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Use ROT26 for best security
I can't read a word of that!
--
-
Richard Quadling
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html
EE4Free : http://www.exper
hi all
having trouble here with a site that I am hosting on go-daddy
I want to keep my php and my images apart
so to do this I have the base directory which contains the php scripts.
On the directory above that I have
my photos stored in /photos
when I run my scripts I get the following:
tim
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:20 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: Ashley Sheridan
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> >> From: Robert Cummings
> >>> Lester Caine wrote:
> James McLean wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
> >> On Thu, 04 Feb 201
From: Ashley Sheridan
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> From: Robert Cummings
>>> Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
>> Maas) wrote:
>>>
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Robert Cummings
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
web
developers maili
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:17 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: Robert Cummings
> > Lester Caine wrote:
> >> James McLean wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
> Maas) wrote:
> > as for using IE6 ... WTF .
From: Robert Cummings
> Lester Caine wrote:
>> James McLean wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem
Maas) wrote:
> as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a
web
> developers mailing list r
Richard Quadling wrote:
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
technolog
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
technology, which could go some way to explaining the abysmal
Lester Caine wrote:
James McLean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:26 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:39:03 +0100, joc...@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) wrote:
as for using IE6 ... WTF ... you do realise this is essentially a web
developers mailing list right?
The interesting things in my we
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:41 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >Lester Caine wrote:
> >> Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
> >> have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
> >> somewhat premat
At 7:02 AM -0600 2/10/10, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
somewhat premature!
What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out b
Try http://www.seekposition.net/php-encode
Ignore everything, just enter the code and check if it still works.
On 2/8/10, Brian Dunning wrote:
> Hey all -
>
> I'm selling a custom PHP solution to FileMaker users. It uses FileMaker's
> PHP API, so everyone who has FileMaker Server is already set
On 10 February 2010 13:02, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I've not had any personal experience with the public sector, but I have
> heard stories from those who have. By all accounts, it seems that most
> of the public sector is still stuck in the dark ages with regards to
> technology, which could go s
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:02 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
> > Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
> > have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
> > somewhat premature!
> > What is needed is someone to kick M$ t
Lester Caine wrote:
> Since a large section of our USER base is still tied to W2k and does not
> have access to install other software, the call for IE6 to die is STILL
> somewhat premature!
> What is needed is someone to kick M$ to sort the mess out by at least
> allowing IE8 to install on W2k mac
On 9 February 2010 22:25, wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:09:05 +, rquadl...@googlemail.com (Richard
> Quadling) wrote:
>
>>On 9 February 2010 14:20, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:19 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> >> I have
On 9 February 2010 22:14, Eric Lommatsch wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Shawn McKenzie [mailto:nos...@mckenzies.net]
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:07 PM
>>To: Eric Lommatsch
>>Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
>>Subject: Re: SOAP connect error
>>
>>Eric Lommatsch wrote:
>>> Hello,
On 9 February 2010 16:47, Ryan Sun wrote:
> thanks, Richard, maybe you are right, the actual file name is not my job
> I changed it to 'php://temp' but its still the same, nothing has been
> changed...
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 9 February 2010 15:42, Ry
66 matches
Mail list logo
