--- Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I made the correction , using $_GET now. Values
> are
> > printing out, aside from the select lists (arrays)
> > which print out as "array".
>
> Yes.
>
> An array will print as "Array"
>
> You'll need to dig into the Array for what you need,
>
Stuart Felenstein wrote:
>
> --- Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Nothing is printing out on $_POST['var'] or $var
>> > s makes sense.
>>
>> Now why are you looking in $_POST for your form
>> values? They're in $_GET. You
>> said earlier that you understood POST and GET?
>
> I made the
--- Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nothing is printing out on $_POST['var'] or $var
> > s makes sense.
>
> Now why are you looking in $_POST for your form
> values? They're in $_GET. You
> said earlier that you understood POST and GET?
I made the correction , using $_GET now. Value
On Saturday 11 December 2004 00:19, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> > > $queryString = ($_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']);
> >
> > What is in $queryString after this? var_dump() it
> > and show us the result.
>
> This is the var_dump of the query string after I've
> made some selections in the page.
> string(
Just want to double check that you're using the correct array in $_POST!
Are you using ? If not then you should be using
$_GET, not $_POST.
$_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] will have the method that you are using,
remember to use the corresponding pre-defined variables.
KJ
Stuart Felenstein wrote:
--
--- "Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AARRGGHHH! Vague, generalized, woolly!!
>
> SHOW US the relevant bits of code. SHOW US what you
> get printed out,
> especially anything that isn't what you expect, and
> tell us exactly what you
> did expect.
> SPECIFICS, man, SPECIFICS!!
>
> S
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
On 10 December 2004 13:27, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> --- Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now in an earlier response I asked you to track your variables and
> > see at
--- Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now in an earlier response I asked you to track your
> variables and see at
> which point they cease to contain what you expect
> them to contain. Did you do
> that? If you're not doing *your* part to help solve
> *your* problem then what
> are you ex
On Friday 10 December 2004 18:59, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> I don't believe that the description of my issue was
> vague. I provided not only what was expected but an
> example. It's still reasonable to believe that there
> could only be a limited number of factors involved as
> to what is missi
--- "Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, stop giving us vague, generalized
> descriptions of your application,
> and how it is or isn't working "right", and vague,
> generalized descriptions
> of the data it's supposed to be working with.
I don't believe that the description of my
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
On 09 December 2004 20:10, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> > Sorry, I'm not following you. Where are my GET
> > parameters ? The way I've built my present script
> > is
> > the reults
> --- Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then your new script is broken, as clearly the GET
> > paramters *ARE* there.
>
> Sorry, I'm not following you. Where are my GET
> parameters ? The way I've built my present script
> is
> the reults page is grabbing the parameters. Do I
> n
--- Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then your new script is broken, as clearly the GET
> paramters *ARE* there.
Sorry, I'm not following you. Where are my GET
parameters ? The way I've built my present script is
the reults page is grabbing the parameters. Do I need
to set up GET pa
On Friday 10 December 2004 00:24, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> Jason, I don't think you read or understood my
> question.
> As I said, it doesn't seem to be a debugging
> scenario.I was asking if anyone would know a
> reason why on one page , one could apply the query
> string to url and t
--- Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Basically I'm throwing this out though since I'm
> > wondering if there is something that should be in
> the
> > search script , that when I apply a query string
> to it
> > would fill in the field (like magic hands)
>
> Yeah I wish I had some magic
On Thursday 09 December 2004 23:16, Stuart Felenstein wrote:
> I'm not sure if this particular is a matter of
> debugging.
Your program doesn't work the way you intended it? So if you don't debug it,
how is it going to get from a "not working as intended" state, to a working
state?
> There is
--- "Ford, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lastly, I wasn't concerned about the hex code, but
> I just made some reconnections of scripts. Users
> can save their search parameters. I am saving the
> query string. Now I had this set up before and the
> way it "was" working , is when the u
17 matches
Mail list logo
