confirm subscribe to php-general@lists.php.net

Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the php-general@lists.php.net mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at php-general-ow...@lists.php.net. To confirm that you would like arch...@mail-archive.com added to the php-general mailing list, please send an e

[PHP] Re: confirm subscribe to php-general@lists.php.net

On 3/18/2010 9:36 PM, php-general-h...@lists.php.net wrote: Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the php-general@lists.php.net mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at php-general-ow...@lists.php.net. To confirm that you would like bmorga...@gmail.com

[PHP] Re: confirm subscribe to php-general@lists.php.net

Re: [PHP] Unsubscribe from php-general@lists.php.net

On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 15:06 -0400, Eddie Drapkin wrote: > :( > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Tom Merriam wrote: > > > -- > > Tom Merriam > > Cell: 512.639.5589 Home: 512.869.6401 > > twmerr...@gmail.com > > I don't think this worked for him, else we wouldn't have got this message :-/ Tom,

Re: [PHP] Unsubscribe from php-general@lists.php.net

:( On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Tom Merriam wrote: > -- > Tom Merriam > Cell: 512.639.5589 Home: 512.869.6401 > twmerr...@gmail.com >

[PHP] Unsubscribe from php-general@lists.php.net

-- Tom Merriam Cell: 512.639.5589 Home: 512.869.6401 twmerr...@gmail.com

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

LOL good points indeed! But I dont use other Google products that much. But yes I'm helping google in some way. One great satisfaction I have is I use Ubuntu with FireFox. :)

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

That's how you help information-monster-privacy-killing-companies to gain more control... You use GMail? ever visited blogspot? search on Google? Visit half of the leading sites of the world (since they have Google Analytics) or visit the other half that have Google Adsense or both of them? Maybe

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

Hahaha quite Hilarious. le...@phpxperts.net is also hosted by Google Apps :P Its the Largest active PHP group in South Asia (originated from Bangladesh). Participated by thousands from many other countries. Keep the humor on! :D

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

Lenin wrote: Yeah gmail is a nice thing :) The best ever mailing system world has ever seen until now. Because now you can get new LeninMail from phpXperts - it works offline, it works in your fridge, you car, your bath, everywhere conventional mail doesn't work. LeninMail combines all th

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lenin wrote: > Yeah gmail is a nice thing :) > > The best ever mailing system world has ever seen until now. > Agreed. -- --Zootboy -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

Yeah gmail is a nice thing :) The best ever mailing system world has ever seen until now.

Re: [PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer wrote: > I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's > an invitation to create an account. > if you send me mail on here it will probably be more secure than over > the rest of the network. just let me know what the new

[PHP] php-general@lists.php.net, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer has invited you to open a Google mail account

I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's an invitation to create an account. if you send me mail on here it will probably be more secure than over the rest of the network. just let me know what the new address will be in case you change mail providers. ---

[PHP] Dear php-general@lists.php.net April 84% 0FF

Canadian Doctor Hazel Best Price On Net http://zxa.pharmstorez.com?liyws -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 11 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Top-posting in honor of Friday. I know. I found a glitch in there on Tuesday or Wednesday, but have since had to let fixing a hosed Linux installation take priority. Hopefully I'll get to it this week. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your s

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 11 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Your script is bust... I wrote code (even if you disregard the joke stuff :) Cheers, Rob. On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 16:00 -0400, PostTrack wrote: > Posting Summary for PHP-General List > Week Ending: Friday, 11 April, 2008 > > Messages| Bytes | Code

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 11 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 11 April, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Code | Sender +++ 295 (100%) 448940 (

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown írta: On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: maybe the problem didn't appear before, or I just didn't notice it... It was the first time I'd noticed it myself, so it's possible that it's the first time it happened. I really only noticed it

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > maybe the problem didn't appear before, or I just didn't notice it... It was the first time I'd noticed it myself, so it's possible that it's the first time it happened. I really only noticed it because I was speci

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown írta: On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PostTrack [Dan Brown] írta: > 10 (3.4%) 33529 (8.5%) Zoltán Németh > 1 (0.3%) 2502(0.6%) Zoltán Németh what's the difference? they should be added up,

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Zoltán Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PostTrack [Dan Brown] írta: > > 10 (3.4%) 33529 (8.5%) Zoltán Németh alterationx dot hu> > > 1 (0.3%) 2502(0.6%) Zoltán Németh alterationx dot hu> > > > what's the differen

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

PostTrack [Dan Brown] írta: > 10 (3.4%) 33529 (8.5%) Zoltán Németh alterationx dot hu> > 1 (0.3%) 2502(0.6%) Zoltán Németh alterationx dot hu> what's the difference? they should be added up, no? greets, Zoltán Németh -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 4 April, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 4 April, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 295 (100%) 393216 (100%) EVERYONE 26 (8.8%)

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 28 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

hey I made into the top five! celebrating this, now I top post :D ;) greets, Zoltán Németh 2008. 03. 28, péntek keltezéssel 16.00-kor PostTrack [Dan Brown] ezt írta: > Posting Summary for PHP-General List > Week Ending: Friday, 28 March, 2008 > > Messages| Bytes

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 28 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 28 March, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 311 (100%) 850774 (100%) EVERYONE 18 (5.8%)

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 21 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 21 March, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 349 (100%) 782080 (100%) EVERYONE 27 (7.7%)

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 14 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Friday 14 March 2008 21:24:30 Jason Pruim wrote: > So... After this post gets sent... Does Dan have some code in here to > kill all traffic on the list for a minimum amount of time? :) no but he does some time travel. merry christmas everyone! ;D > > Happy Friday everyone! > > On Mar 14, 2008,

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 14 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

So... After this post gets sent... Does Dan have some code in here to kill all traffic on the list for a minimum amount of time? :) Happy Friday everyone! On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:00 PM, PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote: Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 14

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 14 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 14 March, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 480 (100%) 799678 (100%) EVERYONE 39 (8.1%)

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 7 March, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 7 March, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 378 (100%) 575642 (100%) EVERYONE 38 (10.1%)

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 29 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 29 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 860 (100%) 1227516 (100%) EVERYONE 123(14.3%

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 22 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 22 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 536 (100%) 739991 (100%) EVERYONE 39 (7.3%)

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 15 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Nathan Rixham wrote: PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote: Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 15 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 394 (100%) 601925 (100%)

[PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 15 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote: Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 15 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 394 (100%) 601925 (100%)

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 15 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 15 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 394 (100%) 601925 (100%) EVERYONE 31 (7.9%)

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 8 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

OI, I'm topposting in irritation herer ;) I've actuallly sent a couple of sarcasting mails and their not even counted. damn you dan. damn you btw, how did you build the sarcasms detect script? ;D my oh my I'm in good mood this morning. On Friday 08 February 2008 22:00:40 PostTrack [Dan Brown] w

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 8 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 8 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 391 (100%) 581347 (100%) EVERYONE 32 (8.2%)

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 1 February, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 1 February, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender ++-- 403 (100%) 717988 (100%) EVERYONE 54 (13.4%)

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

Jay Blanchard schreef: [snip] where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) [/snip] There are no stats for last week because I participated. any way you cut it Richard wins ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n

RE: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

[snip] where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) [/snip] There are no stats for last week because I participated. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 16:43 +0100, Zoltán Németh wrote: > where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) > Jochem already did it for this week, so I think Dan is taking the week off. --Paul All Email originating from UWC is covered by disclaimer http://www.uwc.ac.za/port

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Jochem Maas wrote: Zoltán Németh schreef: hey Dan, where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) ha, so I'm not the only one wanting to know how close to the truth my predictions for this weeks stat are ;-) Oh, I'm interested... :) J

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Zoltán Németh schreef: hey Dan, where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) ha, so I'm not the only one wanting to know how close to the truth my predictions for this weeks stat are ;-) greets Zoltán Németh -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To un

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

hey Dan, where is the stats for last week? the experiment is over or what? ;) greets Zoltán Németh -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January,2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:14:34 +, David Powers wrote: > A Google check on my email address shows that, with one exception, it > has been released into the public domain solely through archives and > mirrors of this list. The exception is a private group, whose > administrator I have alerted t

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Thu, January 24, 2008 10:11 pm, Wolf wrote: > Jay Blanchard wrote: >> [snip] >>> Dude, I laughed so loud that it echoed in the halls of the >>> Engineering Wing over here. What makes it so funny? That it's not >>> much of an exaggeration! ;-D >>> >> >> very glad to raise a laugh :-) those

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 23:11 -0500, Wolf wrote: > Jay Blanchard wrote: > > [snip] > >> Dude, I laughed so loud that it echoed in the halls of the > >> Engineering Wing over here. What makes it so funny? That it's not > >> much of an exaggeration! ;-D > >> > > > > very glad to raise a laugh :

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] Dude, I laughed so loud that it echoed in the halls of the Engineering Wing over here. What makes it so funny? That it's not much of an exaggeration! ;-D very glad to raise a laugh :-) those without a sense of humour should leave the php highway at the next

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 24, 2008 1:11 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 8:13 AM, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The first time we ever see all of us face to face there will have to be > > a lot of beer bought. The conversation will be interesting though. > > Several folks w

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 24, 2008 8:13 AM, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first time we ever see all of us face to face there will have to be > a lot of beer bought. The conversation will be interesting though. > Several folks will ask and answer questions. I will say RTFM so many > times that folks

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 09:10 +0100, Zoltán Németh wrote: > 2008. 01. 24, csütörtök keltezéssel 02.45-kor Wolf ezt írta: > > Jochem Maas wrote: > > > > > > Posting Summary for PHP-General List > > > Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 > > > > > > Messages| Bytes | S

RE: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

2008. 01. 24, csütörtök keltezéssel 07.13-kor Jay Blanchard ezt írta: > [snip] > > Dude, I laughed so loud that it echoed in the halls of the > > Engineering Wing over here. What makes it so funny? That it's not > > much of an exaggeration! ;-D > > > > very glad to raise a laugh :-) those

RE: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

[snip] > Dude, I laughed so loud that it echoed in the halls of the > Engineering Wing over here. What makes it so funny? That it's not > much of an exaggeration! ;-D > very glad to raise a laugh :-) those without a sense of humour should leave the php highway at the next exit. ;-) oh and

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Paul Scott schreef: On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 01:13 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote: stats while I'm at it ... I've been busy wracking my brain trying to figure out the setup for a load-balanced configuration for one of my major clients ... at least a system capable of migrating to loadbalancing ... global

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

2008. 01. 24, csütörtök keltezéssel 02.45-kor Wolf ezt írta: > Jochem Maas wrote: > > > > Posting Summary for PHP-General List > > Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 > > > > Messages| Bytes | Sender > > +-+-- > >

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Jochem Maas wrote: Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender +-+-- 697 (100%) 975244 (100%) EVERYONE 690 (98.9%) 974000 (99.8%)

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 01:13 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote: > stats while I'm at it ... I've been busy wracking my brain trying to > figure out > the setup for a load-balanced configuration for one of my major > clients ... at least > a system capable of migrating to loadbalancing ... global file system

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 23, 2008 7:13 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I was bored, figured I'd have some fun and artificially boost my post > stats while I'm at it ... I've been busy wracking my brain trying to figure > out > the setup for a load-balanced configuration for one of my major clie

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown schreef: On Jan 23, 2008 6:57 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender +-+--

Re: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 23, 2008 6:57 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Posting Summary for PHP-General List > Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 > > Messages| Bytes | Sender > +-+-- > 697 (100

[PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 25 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Posting Summary for PHP-General List Week Ending: Friday, 25 January, 2008 Messages| Bytes | Sender +-+-- 697 (100%) 975244 (100%) EVERYONE 690 (98.9%) 974000 (99.

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Richard Lynch wrote: > You'll also have a VERY tough time trying to ram EU privacy laws > through a non-EU court, if Dan is not in the EU... Forcing American law on other people of the world has not been a problem for America, why should it be a problem for the EU? :-( > You *know* it's an inter

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Sat, January 19, 2008 12:51 pm, Per Jessen wrote: > David Powers wrote: >> When I subscribed to the PHP general mailing list I did not give >> permission for this. This is an international list, and what you're >> doing breaks EU privacy laws, and possibly those in other countries >> too. > > Hm

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

2008. 01. 19, szombat keltezéssel 11.12-kor Daniel Brown ezt írta: > Aside from that, Zoltan, if you happen to be able to find the > function to post without much problem, feel free, and I'll look into > incorporating it into the script. Otherwise, I can fix it myself. My > fault for not thi

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January,2008:php-general@lists.php.net

Børge Holen wrote: You really don't get it yet? You distributed it, I knew your email long before Dan did squat, didn't take any programming to acomplish that. Obviously, you don't get it either. It's now common practice to remove email addresses from public forums. Instead of justifying Dan'

RE: [PHP] Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

[snip] Sending to the LIST this time... I personally replied, how dumb was *I* this morning... And top posted... Twice... Dang Jay, you feeling OK? You've been quiet the last week... Or did Richard just tie you up so you couldn't post and he could get top honors this week? :) [/snip] Ri

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Sunday 20 January 2008 22:38:24 Robert Cummings wrote: > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D > > > > damn, did i, like, just publish

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 20, 2008 4:38 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D > > > > > > > damn,

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D > > > > damn, did i, like, just publish it again :-O Is this going to turn into one of those thi

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D > damn, did i, like, just publish it again :-O -nathan

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Sunday 20 January 2008 22:06:54 Nathan Nobbe wrote: > have you ever googled for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? > looks like it brings up some thread from around > september of 07... oh wait; isnt that before dan > started up the stat program .. > > -nathan MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get ton

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

have you ever googled for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? looks like it brings up some thread from around september of 07... oh wait; isnt that before dan started up the stat program .. -nathan

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

On Sunday 20 January 2008 19:58:03 David Powers wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > I understand what you are thinking, but the fact > > remains your address is already public for having posted to the list. It > > seems you are getting bent out of shape because you aren't grasping this > > fact. Da

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008:php-general@lists.php.net

Robert Cummings wrote: I understand what you are thinking, but the fact remains your address is already public for having posted to the list. It seems you are getting bent out of shape because you aren't grasping this fact. Dan hasn't done anything wrong nor does he owe any apologies or concessio

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 18:02 +, David Powers wrote: > Stut wrote: > > You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email > > address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand that > > then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation. > > I do unders

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On 20 Jan 2008, at 18:02, David Powers wrote: Stut wrote: You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand that then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation. I do understand it. What I object

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Stut wrote: You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand that then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation. I do understand it. What I object to is a supposedly responsible member of this li

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On 20 Jan 2008, at 17:49, David Powers wrote: Andrés Robinet wrote: 3 - I don't like the attitude of both Dan and David. IMHO, David thinks the issue is more severe than it is, and Dan just won't recognize that mangling email addresses is kind of a (arguably also) "standard practice". No pu

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 10:04 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote: > That would actually be pretty interesting. Since we've all been > known to beat a thread to death, it certainly wouldn't be difficult to > collect the data. FWIW, I would like to continue to see these postings, as mailing list metrics

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Andrés Robinet wrote: 3 - I don't like the attitude of both Dan and David. IMHO, David thinks the issue is more severe than it is, and Dan just won't recognize that mangling email addresses is kind of a (arguably also) "standard practice". No public apologize is needed, but maybe "Yeah, I just

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Daniel Brown wrote: On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next week nice; say, dan, here comes

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next > > week > > nice; say, dan, here comes another feature request; can we see th

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Nathan Nobbe wrote: > i didnt see the option in gmail; but if you know where it is or how to > set it up in gmail, i will happily take the 2 seconds to enable it. Sorry, I don't use gmail. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next > week nice; say, dan, here comes another feature request; can we see the top thread (or 3 :)) as well ? -nathan

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next week -- H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature. + Ashley M. Kirchner . 303.442.6410 x130 IT Director / SysAd

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown wrote: On Jan 19, 2008 8:55 PM, Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Powers wrote: Daniel Brown wrote: Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby. I have also noticed that many of the respon

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 8:55 PM, Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Powers wrote: > > Daniel Brown wrote: > >> Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this > >> thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby. > > > > I have also noticed that many of the response

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 8:15 PM, Andrés Robinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2 - I don't have anything against my name and email being published in the > stats (sure, I'd like support for the "é" character on my name :)). I don't > care about spam either, we all get spam anyway, and that's why we have RB

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

David Powers wrote: Daniel Brown wrote: Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby. I have also noticed that many of the responses come from #1 Rated "Year's Coolest Guy" By Self. A little humility might

RE: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

> -Original Message- > From: David Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 10:22 PM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, > 2008: php-general@lists.php.net > > Jochem Maas wr

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

David Powers schreef: Jochem Maas wrote: if I am correct you are or were a journalist. forgive if I have mistaken you for another, but if that is correct then how often have you trodden on someone's privacy for the sake of a story? Yes, I was a journalist for some 30 years, but roughly two-t

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Jochem Maas wrote: if I am correct you are or were a journalist. forgive if I have mistaken you for another, but if that is correct then how often have you trodden on someone's privacy for the sake of a story? Yes, I was a journalist for some 30 years, but roughly two-thirds of that time was

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

David Powers schreef: Daniel Brown wrote: Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking you in the same way you did to me Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you? good mantra - please repeat to yourself 20 times every morning whilst you brush your teeth. actually I

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown wrote: Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby. I have also noticed that many of the responses come from #1 Rated "Year's Coolest Guy" By Self. A little humility might be in order. I don

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 5:25 PM, David Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: > > Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking > > you in the same way you did to me > > Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you? You published the name and > email address of every si

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Daniel Brown wrote: Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking you in the same way you did to me Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you? You published the name and email address of every single person who contributed to this mailing list in the past week. I didn't

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 2:06 PM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > > On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [snip] > > regarding configuring mail clients to omit the senders address in the > > reply, well, this is one of those things that you

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

On Jan 19, 2008 1:36 PM, David Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2008 12:30 PM, David Powers wrote: > > >> Yes, and it's obvious how that happens. It's because people, including > >> yourself, don't have the courtesy to set up your email or newreader > >> progra

Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January, 2008: php-general@lists.php.net

Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > regarding configuring mail clients to omit the senders address in the > reply, well, this is one of those things that you just cant expect > every user to do. Not even you? (see above) /Per Jes

  1   2   3   4   >