Hi
On Jun 17, 2016 8:18 PM, "Christoph Becker" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I like to suggest to improve the current test suite of the gd extension.
> The main issue I see with the current suite is that many (~ 28) tests
> use md5() to verify that a drawn image is correct. However, as Pierre
> mentioned lo
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Matt Ficken wrote:
> I'd like to start uploading PFTT test reports to qa.php.net, as discussed
> earlier.
>
> To that end, I have written the POST script to upload report files to
> qa.php.net and the php files to display the list branches, revisions and
> reports.
2014 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Joye
wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye
wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Just because
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>>> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not
>>> mean
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not
> mean that a tool developed outside the php.net domain is automatically
> php.net property. This is not a corporate world that screws you over
> and you have not sign
hi Hannes,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Matt Ficken wrote:
>> What about posting my test results on qa.php.net? The summary email
>> messages could continue as is, or only include a link to the appropriate
>> part of qa.php.net or
hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Jan Tvrdík wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm just wondering why is php5apache2_2.dll not included in PHP 5.5 QA
> releases. The latest PHP 5.5 release with php5apache2_2.dll was alpha 6 built
> with VC9. All later releases are built only using VC11 and no longer include
>
hi!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:41 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
> Nuno - just a PS to the last note. It is (mainly) the task allocation across
> processors which means that running tests in parallel on a 4-way machine is
> not 4 times as fast as running them in sequence.
>
> Here are some results from a
