eschmid Sun Sep 2 06:52:33 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsircg.xml
Log:
Whitespace only and deleted empty 'See also'.
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/ircg.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/ircg.xml:1.10 phpdoc/en/functions/ircg.xml:1.11
---
eschmid Sun Sep 2 07:39:06 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsmysql.xml
Log:
Only whitespace.
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml:1.64 phpdoc/en/functions/mysql.xml:1.65
---
jah Sun Sep 2 09:16:42 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc Makefile.in
Log:
- Added -wno-idref option to jade arguments, so the manuals will be
generated even if the are missing IDs.
- New target 'test_man_gen' that checks if its possible to generate
Hi,
it seems that the examples on arsort() and asort() are wrong:
the docs say that the result would be (array.xml:1664)
fruits[a] = orange
fruits[d] = lemon
fruits[b] = banana
fruits[c] = apple
but the example actually displays
a = orange
d = lemon
b = banana
c = apple
--
Marco Cucinato
gobaSun Sep 2 09:27:42 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsarray.xml
Log:
Correct bug
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.88 phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.89
---
it seems that the examples on arsort() and asort() are wrong:
the docs say that the result would be (array.xml:1664)
fruits[a] = orange
fruits[d] = lemon
fruits[b] = banana
fruits[c] = apple
but the example actually displays
a = orange
d = lemon
b = banana
c = apple
You are
From: Hojtsy Gabor
Some time ago, we tried to discuss our revision chechking
ideas here on the list, but the discussion was pointless
as there were no actual script and implementation to talk
about.
As you know, I have been against a revision checking system. It is
useless to write a
What will you do with maintainers (responsibles) for a particular
file if he is inactive for 15 months and two weeks. I can see this
in the German documentation (look at [en|de]/functions/pcre.xml and
de/Translators). There is a maintainer for the German version and
nothing happens.
The hu
Hi,
the docs say count() function returns the number of elements of a
variable, or 1 if it's not an array, or 0 if the array is void or the
variable isn't set.
I think that the paragraph (array.xml:1826)
Returns 1 if the variable is not an array.
should be changed to
Returns 1 either if the
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Egon Schmid wrote:
From: Hojtsy Gabor
Hope this helps to start a discussion about the usefullness
of this revision comment syntax...
It may be working in the hu tree, there is only one maintainer :)
This would not work in the German manual, because we have many
I see a picture forming here. I think I remember at least Jeroen, Derick
and Damien strongly supporting Gobas idea. And all these translations are
maintained by a very small team, in Damiens case really just one.
Interesting thing :)
So it seems that what works for and helps one translation
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
As I wrote down in my last long letter (titled:
Re: [PHP-DOC] Revision longer example), we can
think of the Revision comments as a splitup of
translators and the script generated revheck.html
as a HTML version of Translators with much extra
stuff
As I heard, we can make the revcheck.php script
run on every commit, so the table can be autogenerated
on every commit, and there would be no need to run
it manually in most of the cases.
Otherwise a good idea, but that would be also forcing everyone to the new
system... would it be
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
If you think there will be too much extra processor time,
the script will take on the server, doing nothing, because
the commit changes no Revision number, we can introduce
a flag in CVS commit messages, so eg:
No, I was just thinking about a
If you think there will be too much extra processor time,
the script will take on the server, doing nothing, because
the commit changes no Revision number, we can introduce
a flag in CVS commit messages, so eg:
No, I was just thinking about a scenario where someone who doesn't use
What do you think about these additional groups?
Variables, types and function handling
Array
Class-object
Function handling
Variable
Session handling
Miscellaneous:
Apache-specific
Error handling and logging
GNU readline
PHP options information
Program execution
Printer
Semaphore
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
What do you think about these additional groups?
Variables, types and function handling
Array
Class-object
Function handling
Variable
Session handling
Miscellaneous:
Apache-specific
Error handling and logging
GNU readline
PHP
I would merge string/character and Variables,types and function
handling, and name it:
basic functions, since they are very general-purpose, do NOT have external
depencies (like mysql, etc), and are quite close to the language.
Error-handling, program execution are also good candidates for basic
The biggest problem is how a php script can update a file
as a regular CVS user and make a new revision of it. This
can be the case for the script automatically updating
Translators or some Revisions.html file in the same dir
as Translators with the HTML tables generated by the script.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I would merge string/character and Variables,types and function
handling, and name it:
basic functions, since they are very general-purpose, do NOT have external
depencies (like mysql, etc), and are quite close to the language.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I would merge string/character and Variables,types and function
handling, and name it:
basic functions, since they are very general-purpose, do NOT have
external
depencies (like mysql, etc), and are quite close to the language.
Commenting the categories list, I don't think
that categories, with only one item should be
opened (eg. Search or URL or Data Exchange).
Yes, under Miscellaneous, unless some other module
too gets moved under those categories.
I see that you have opened them to start discussion
about
From: Hojtsy Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The biggest problem is how a php script can update a file
as a regular CVS user and make a new revision of it. This
can be the case for the script automatically updating
Translators or some Revisions.html file in the same dir
as Translators with the
Hi,
each() function has a refpurpose
Return the next key and value pair from an array
but a description
Returns the current key and value pair from the array
The second behaviour is the correct one.
Should I correct the refpurpose tag to
Return the current key and value pair from an array and
each() function has a refpurpose
Return the next key and value pair from an array
but a description
Returns the current key and value pair from the array
The second behaviour is the correct one.
Should I correct the refpurpose tag to
Return the current key and value pair from an array and
cucinatoSun Sep 2 16:58:48 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/functionsarray.xml
Log:
Corrected each() refpurpose
Index: phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.91 phpdoc/en/functions/array.xml:1.92
---
Anyway, I still find the system Goba proposed to have a lot of benefits,
although there really seems to be one small thing that needs a bit more
thinking.
I agree. I even think the system is very useful, but there are still a few
issues.
There is no problem though when there is an english
¶Ç¯u¸¹½X¥X°â
§Ú¦³¥_°Ï02_¶}ÀY¶Ç¯u¸¹½X¡A¦@¬°77270µ§
¬O§Ú±q¦UÓ¦P·~¤½·|¡B¹q¸Üï¡B¶À¶¡B¼x«H©Ò¡B
ºô»Úºô¸ô¡A¥úºÐ¤ù...µ¥µ¥¡A
¸g¦~²Ö¤ë¤@µ§¤@µ§¥´¤J¦¬¶°¤U¨Óªº¡A¶O¤F«Ü¤jªº¥\¤Ò¡C
¥úªá¿ú¶R¼x«H©Ò¥Xªºªº¥U¤l¡A´Nªá¤F¤£¤Ö¿ú¡A
¦A¸g¹L²Îp¤èªk¾ã²z¡A©Ò¥H¨S¦³¥ô¦ó¤@µ§¬O«½Æªº¡A
To make the story short. German translators don´t need a revision
number or a revision comment.
Basta;-)
The chief has spoken.
sorry, I couldn't resist;-)
Conni
a german translator
29 matches
Mail list logo
