On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:53:11PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I have no idea why those s are there, and they do annoy me too :]
How about I make the changes I suggsted to all the files in the
datetime/datetime directory. Then folks can take a look and see what
they think about the resu
Heya:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:50:50PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 20:57, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
> > Welcome Jesus:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Jess Cova wrote:
> >> Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i commit a document i do not know.. i
>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 19:32, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hello Again:
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:38:29AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>>
>> * variablelist in the parameters section
>> * informaltable in the changelog section
>> * example in the examples section
>> * simplelist in the seealso
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 20:57, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Welcome Jesus:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Jess Cova wrote:
>> Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i commit a document i do not know.. i
>> have a SVN account but i'm new
>
> In short, do a "svn checkout" of the source code.
Welcome Jesus:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Jess Cova wrote:
> Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i commit a document i do not know.. i
> have a SVN account but i'm new
In short, do a "svn checkout" of the source code. Then make your
changes, do an "svn diff" to make sure the chang
Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i commit a document i do not know.. i
have a SVN account but i'm new
--
Regards
Jesús Rafael Cova Huerta
Hello Again:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:38:29AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> * variablelist in the parameters section
> * informaltable in the changelog section
> * example in the examples section
> * simplelist in the seealso section
>
> The Element Reference in "DocBook: The Definitive G
Hi Peter:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:00:50AM +0100, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>
> I don't think having a new example block just for output makes much
> semantic sense. How about having multiple elements
> (one per paradigm) and one with the &examples.outputs*
> entities?
I just tested it and it wor
On 22 April 2010 03:28, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> In trying to add the procedural style interface to the DateTime docs I
> went searching for how we currently present stuff that has both object
> oriented and procedural interfaces. It turns out there is no consistent
> way of going
