At work we chose reStructuredText[1], because it gives you way more
elements than markdown and is only slighter harder to write. Plain
markdown e.g. has no tables, and definition lists, while rST has it out
of the box.
That is pretty much exactly why I didn't want to use it.
It was just to
Hi!
This means that the users/writers of doc have to learn the syntax
anyway. So in my opinion it would be easier to teach them
rST+Less-Extra-Rules than Mardown+More-Extra-Rules.
From what I see in rST (and please correct me if I am wrong) this is
purely presentational markup, as is markdown
On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Christian Weiske cwei...@cweiske.de wrote:
Hello Hannes,
As an update.. Here is an actually generated page[1] into this new
markdown/rST style format, and its html rendering[2] using the new
tool, wtfm[3].
I still haven't received any suggested pure rST
Markdown or anything easier than Docbook seems brilliant but What will
happen to right to left languages?
We couldn't solve the rtl problem in Docbook. Will the problem persist in
the new format?
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
As an
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
This means that the users/writers of doc have to learn the syntax
anyway. So in my opinion it would be easier to teach them
rST+Less-Extra-Rules than Mardown+More-Extra-Rules.
From what I see in rST (and
Excellent question.
Do you know of any rtl examples using formats like markdown or rst?
I've never really given it any thought.
-Hannes
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:18 AM, pedram salehpoor
pedram.salehp...@gmail.com wrote:
Markdown or anything easier than Docbook seems brilliant but What will
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Christian Stoller stol...@leonex.de wrote:
At work we chose reStructuredText[1], because it gives you way more
elements than markdown and is only slighter harder to write. Plain
markdown e.g. has no tables, and definition lists, while rST has it out
of the
I was unable to find any decent rtl extension for Markdown except some
javascript stuff
but Docutils uses Python code and CSS to give bidirectional support to rst.
It seems no rtl language has ever given any thought to use these in large
scale or maybe I was unable to find them.
On Tue, Aug 13,
On 10/08/13 07:34, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I've been thinking lately about how we can make it easier for people
to contribute to the project..
The OE was a great improvement and made it whole lot simpler to get
going for users and did its job pretty well.
Editing xml however isn't something
Bjori example's seems easier to figure out what's going to happen.
I vote Markdown ratter than Wiki, because you can learn just reading
another person's work.
Um abraço,
:: Rafael Jaques (phpit.com.br http://www.phpit.com.br)
:: Cristão - Professor - Evangelista PHP
:: Se confessarmos os nossos
Hello Nikola,
Have you people considered simply moving the documentation to a wiki?
For example, MediaWiki?
* Build time in seconds.
* Wikitext syntax is as simple as any other presented so far.
No. Mediawiki's syntax is a pile of stinking something. There is not
even a formal syntax
11 matches
Mail list logo
