If there's a discontinuity, such as existing names going away, or even
if it's just an important new name coming in, a version number such as
0.10.0 would be more appropriate than 0.9.6. 0.9.6 and particularly
0.9.5.1 (please let's not!) would indicate minor changes which wouldn't
require
This is just a heads-up to keep those interested parties informed
about what's going on with pilot-link.
I've recently resigned my employment with Linuxcare, and am in a
holding pattern as I have been asked to reconsider that decision. I
probably will not reconsider. This means
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:10:26AM -0800, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
then we begin collapsing the redundant binaries into
singular entities. The 'install-memos' and 'memos' binaries for
example, would either be collapsed into one called 'memos' with
a
On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 12:10, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
4.) USB support can only come last, after the top three above are
working (and 1, 2, and 3 are fairly short-term tasks). The
reason for this, is that there exists a very tight coupling of
the protocols
