--- Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net wrote:
Hi everyone, I am freshly inspired after this weekends pinhole forum, hosted
by Tom Miller and Bill Erikson, at the pARTs gallery in Minneapolis. Very
nice job, hope to see more like it.
I'm interested in trying paper negative work with
--- Katharine Thayer ktha...@pacifier.com wrote:
Andrew Amundsen wrote:
1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?
Kodak single-weight paper has no labeling on the back.
Keep in mind that single weight paper is going to curl like mad.
Cheers -
george
Thanks for the reply, Guillermo. And I agree about the earlier archive
being easier to search than the more recent postings. I hope to
combine the two sometime next year into a single archive similar to the
earlier one.
- Gregg
On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:12 PM, Guillermo wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net
...how do we access the archives? Could someone post a link?
Andrew:
You will see a link to the DISCUSSION page, at the foot of each posting, go
there and 3/4 down the page there is a link to archives. There are 2
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for the kind comments. There will be more forums (or fora,
for purists).
To tell the truth, I'm looking forward to seeing the answer to your
questions on which paper to use. I still have a box or two of Ilford
Multigrade III RC matt, which was single-weight with no
Andrew Amundsen wrote:
1) What brand of single weight photo paper has NO labeling on it's back?
Kodak single-weight paper has no labeling on the back.
Katharine Thayer
Thanks for the comment. I thought it was good too. Most folks like Ilford
paper. No, the kodak printing doesn't always come through, but you never can
tell. most folks use an ISo of 5 for starters. I've always used RC.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Amundsen a...@tcinternet.net
To:
