-
From: "Alexis Rago"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole
Brian
You do not need the film holder for scanning negatives or
transparencies on the Epson 2450.
The holder is used for getting thumbnails on the scanning s
This works finr but beware of Newton rings. It is best to keep the film off
of thr glass.
Richard Heather
- Original Message -
From: "Alexis Rago"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole
> Brian
>
>
Brian
You do not need the film holder for scanning negatives or
transparencies on the Epson 2450.
The holder is used for getting thumbnails on the scanning software so
you can do some some things
before the image is scanned.
You can just place the negative under the light and the scan will tak
If your going to scan your images then why don't you use one of the prints
only polaroid
films. Many types out there, 52, 53, 54, or 57 should be cheaper then the PN
film and
Type 57 will give you an ISO of 3000.
>= Original Message From callum moffat =
>i know that this has probably
callum moffat wrote:
> any advice on the camera(which i havnt had a chance to use yet)the
> film, and on scanning it using a microtek scanmaker 5600 gratefully
> recieved
I use Polaroid Type 55 with lenses and pinholes. Depending on where
you get your B&W processed (I don't have a darkroom) Type
i know that this has probably been discussed before ,
but i have bought a bob rigby pinhol camera and am
thinking of using t 55 with it
partly for cost reasons, although t55 is not cheap
here in uk, but also for the film's aesthetic appeal
any advice on the camera(which i havnt had a chance to
u
