[pinhole-discussion] Type 55 question

2002-10-27 Thread Catherine Just
Hi everyone, I am getting ready to start a project that I would prefer using type 55 for. One thing I love about type 55 is that when you pull the negative away from the the rest of the polaroid, you sometimes get that strip of material across the top with the holes in it. I would like to keep

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field

2002-02-23 Thread DAlfrey
In a message dated 2/23/02 8:34:13 PM Central Standard Time, bowk...@uwstout.edu writes: Dan - yes, I checked it, it is a Nalgene bottle. 8oz size, 250 ml. Wide top. Sally Thanks Dan G. and Sally B., I have several wide mouth Nalgene bottles which I typically use for backpacking,

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field

2002-02-23 Thread Sally Bowker
. -Dan Gerber -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Sally Bowker Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:57 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field I

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field

2002-02-22 Thread Dan Gerber
at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Sally Bowker Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:57 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field I bought a 4+ high lightweight plastic jar made for backpacking, some famous name brand I can't

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-22 Thread DAlfrey
In a message dated 2/21/02 11:44:51 PM Central Standard Time, mike.vandeb...@mixcom.com writes: Polaroid used to make a holding tank for this purpose, and they show up on eBay from time to time. A company called Graphic Center (in Ventura, California) also makes a much less expensive tank,

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 in the field

2002-02-21 Thread Sally Bowker
I bought a 4+ high lightweight plastic jar made for backpacking, some famous name brand I can't remember. It was relatively expensive, several dollars, but doesn't leak and I filled it with water and rolled the negatives around the edge. They were against each other, but didn't stick

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Leaks

2002-02-21 Thread George L Smyth
--- Howard Wells sandw...@earthlink.net wrote: Agree that Tupperware leaks. The field process I outlined before my coffee (and is stolen from Marc Hauser) involves moist paper towels and sponge. No sloshing liquids, which can be carried in a water bottle. It does involve handling wet towels

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-21 Thread The Painted Horse
I simply sandwich my negatives in between store-bought baby wipes. They are already moist and come packaged in a variety of sizes. I put them in a ziplock baggy so they stay moist and have had no problems with this method as of yet. Bill- dalf...@aol.com wrote: My question to those of you

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Use

2002-02-21 Thread Calfee, Laura
tupperware works ok to a point. you have to be very careful about scratching the film though. the best solution is the clearing tanks that hold 10-12 sheets of film. i bought two to take out in the field so i could keep the clearing solution in one and use the other to wash. they're great.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Use

2002-02-21 Thread Gordon Holtslander
-discussion] Type 55 Field Use To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Tupperware (or other flat sealable plastic) container with interleaved paper towels and a sponge of enough thickness to hold the stack of negatives still when the container is closed. Wetting agent is water or Permawash

[pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Leaks

2002-02-21 Thread Howard Wells
Agree that Tupperware leaks. The field process I outlined before my coffee (and is stolen from Marc Hauser) involves moist paper towels and sponge. No sloshing liquids, which can be carried in a water bottle. It does involve handling wet towels and sponge so that probably leaves the Sodium S.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-21 Thread Bill Erickson
All suggestions will work, but just letting it dry and then re-wetting it when you want to clear it worked OK for me. - Original Message - From: dalf...@aol.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:09 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 holding tank

2002-02-21 Thread George L Smyth
I never did find anything that worked well and kept the liquid within its container. Even Tupperware containers will leak with enough agitation. The process got messy to the point where using Type 55 in the field no longer made sense to me. Cheers - george --- Colin Talcroft

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Use

2002-02-21 Thread James Kellar
I always had trouble with Tupperware leaking, and it's a pain to carry around in the wooks. Calumet photo carries a holding tank. I did quick search but could'nt find it. I'm sure is you spent some time you could. James

[pinhole-discussion] Type 55 Field Use

2002-02-21 Thread Howard Wells
Tupperware (or other flat sealable plastic) container with interleaved paper towels and a sponge of enough thickness to hold the stack of negatives still when the container is closed. Wetting agent is water or Permawash. Or the bucket clearing tank with the filmholder insert available from various

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 holding tank

2002-02-21 Thread Colin Talcroft
Yes, this has been on my mind, too. I was thinking maybe a Tupperware container of the right size? My question to those of you who use Type 55 in the field is this, How do you keep the negative moist until you get home Thanks dalf...@aol.com

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-21 Thread DAlfrey
While the focus is on discussion of Typ55 Polaroid films, I have a question. Once I press the process lever on my 4X5 film holder and pull and wait the amount of time needed to develop correctly , I then peel apart the 'pod(?) and seperate the negative from the positive print , and wash in

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Howard Wells
: Howard Wells sandw...@earthlink.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:44 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments Late last year a list member published a chart of reciprocity adjustments with Type 55 Polaroid. I printed it out

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Adrian Joyner
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments Late last year a list member published a chart of reciprocity adjustments with Type 55 Polaroid. I printed it out, lost it, and now can't find it in the archives. Some interior work has taken me into uncharted (to me) realms

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Chris Peregoy
In his book, Polaroid Land Photography, By Ansel Adams from 1978 he states that; an indicated time of 8 sec should be 16 sec (2X) an indicated time of 16 sec should be 40 sec (2.5x) an indicated time of 32 sec should be 96 sec (3x) an indicated time of 64 sec should be 256 sec (4x) -- --

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Bill Erickson
, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: AW: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments I am not sure you refer to this post, but here is what I have saved: == Guy, Back in the 1974 Jim Shull published The Hole Thing, a pinhole photography book which includes a table of reciprocity

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Guy Glorieux
Blush, blush, blush... Guy - Original Message - From: Markus Birsfelder b...@freesurf.ch To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:12 PM Subject: AW: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments I am not sure you refer to this post, but here

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Guy Glorieux
I would appreciate the list also. I just bought a pack of Type 55 for experimental reasons. Tom Miller I'll join on that too. Would there be a way to post that information somewhere that is can be retreived by a lot of people, since I'm sure there are many others than Gordon or Tom looking

AW: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Markus Birsfelder
. == -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]Im Auftrag von Howard Wells Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 16:44 An: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Betreff: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Tom Miller
: Gordy Emery geme...@hotmail.com To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments Tom, I would like a copy also. I now know what the new museum display will be at the H.H. BENNETT MUSEUM . I think

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Gordy Emery
with the people who are in charge of finding the new C.E.O. Gordy From: Tom Miller twmil...@mr.net Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:41:14 -0600 I would appreciate

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Tom Miller
I would appreciate the list also. I just bought a pack of Type 55 for experimental reasons. Tom Miller - Original Message - From: Howard Wells sandw...@earthlink.net To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:44 AM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55

[pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Howard Wells
Late last year a list member published a chart of reciprocity adjustments with Type 55 Polaroid. I printed it out, lost it, and now can't find it in the archives. Some interior work has taken me into uncharted (to me) realms with this wonderful material. Help and thanks. Howard Wells

Re: [pinhole-discussion] type 55

2001-07-23 Thread B2MYOUNG
In a message dated 7/23/01 1:41:50 PM, lcal...@uh.edu writes: I'm using a wide angle Leonard pinhole (f150) and type 55 Polaoid film. Does anyone have any suggestions/advice: (1) calculating exposures, (2) caring for the film in the field, or (3) anything else I should know? Thanks