Michael Keller wrote:
>
> BTW, don't confuse Outlook with Outlook Express. OE is the toy program.
>
By "built-in" I meant built in to MS Office (Outlook), not
built in to every copy of Windows ever produced (Outlook Express).
Mike
Yes, I agree. That IS what YOU get.
Here is what I get:
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Subject Line on the Received Messages
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 13:59:33 -0400
From: "Michael Keller"
Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
To:
So I can't sort on th
nhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Mike Vande
|Bunt
|Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:51 AM
|To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
|Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Subject Line on the Received Messages
|Importance: High
|
|
|This is not universally true. On my system the From: address
|
2001 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Subject Line on the Received Messages
> I often receive over 100 e-mails per day. It it VERY usefull to me
> to have the pinhole list message subjects identified with the
> "[pinhole-discussion]" prefix. I would certainly suppor
This is not universally true. On my system the From: address
lists the actual list member's address. The Reply To: address
is the one that has the list address in it. I believe that the better
e-mail programs such as Eudora have the capability to sort
incomming mail based on ANY header field, bu
I often receive over 100 e-mails per day. It it VERY usefull to me
to have the pinhole list message subjects identified with the
"[pinhole-discussion]" prefix. I would certainly support shortening
the prefix to "[pinhole]" to allow more space for the "real" subject.
Mike Vande Bunt
Ricardo Wil
An additional data point: in Outlook I can filter using the From: address,
and since all the email comes from pinhole-discussion, it would be easy
enough to use that filter, instead of the subject line. I imagine you can
set a similar filter in other programs.
I also use the subject line to filter my mail into different folders, but if
the subject line was shortened to just "pinhole" we'd still have the
filtering capabilities and the subject lines would be shorter.
Mike Keller
http://www.mikekellerphoto.com
"Don't let your mouth write no check your tai
Like many others, I also use the [pinhole-discussion] as a way of filtering
my email messages and routing list messages directly into my
pinhole-discussion mail box. I appreciate that it would present a problem
to many people if it were removed. Likewise, changing it would also be
disruptive
In a message dated 10/7/01 12:03:17 AM Central Daylight Time,
glsm...@yahoo.com writes:
<< I would disagree. That portion of the Subject line is what I use to tell
my
mail program to put the incoming message into the Pinhole folder. I also
have
Infrared and Alt Processing folders.
Cheers
I subscribe to two other photography groups, so seeing the pinhole-discussion
is helpful in organizing my e-mail.
John McAdam
--- Ricardo Wildberger Lisboa wrote:
>
>
> Dear Gregg,
>
> What do you think of the idea of removing "[pinhole-discussion]" from the
> subject line we receive identifying the message, so that we could have more
> useful space for using with the subject ? We don't need this reminder to know
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
