Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main?
It's stuck in the new queue atm:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/openjdk-6_6b10dfsg-1.html .
Fedora is
already shipping it, right?
Yes.
cheers,
dalibor topic
and
kfreebsd-amd64.
Hi Samuel,
are you sure this is a patch for GNU Classpath? It patches a braille.c
file, which I doubt exists in GNU Classpath itself, so I assume you just
attached the wrong patch ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers
Bob Black schrieb:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Bob Black wrote:
Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically
armel only going forward?
It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build:
http://buildd.debian.org
on gcj, which in turn depends on
ecj to build, and since there is
no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity at the end of the chain is
killing the builds.
One way to unblock it would be to make ecj depend on jamvm alternatively
on arm, I guess.
cheers,
dalibor topic
or firewall since the
java debugger is handled using socket.
I have no idea regarding this sugestion, I mean if this is possible or not.
See
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Debug_FAQ#I_can_run_a_program_but_not_debug_it.3F.3F.3F
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg
the way to go. I've seen one of two issues
in the Maven JIRA mentioning
the transition to common-cli 1.1, but I don't think there was a patch
for it, so I assume the Maven
developers would welcome the fix.
cheers.
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Everything was going fine until I realized that the debug functionality
does not work, I mean it's not possible go step by step through the code.
Does Eclipse use the Sun JDK as the VM for the project?
cheers,
dalibor topic
#setState(boolean)
Thanks for the bug report. I tried to reproduce it and I couldn't. Could
you write a small test case for the bug that shows the bug?
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
changes automatically.
You seem to be arguing for packagers to be careful about documented
ABI/API changes in the
code and to check for them manually, if necessary.
I believe those approaches are complementary.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java
Marcus Better wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
It seems to me that we must keep track of ABI compatibility. This is a
bit complicated, but it's our job if we want to be a well-integrated
distribution. In other words we should try to solve the library
versioning problem first, and only then try
information.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
/
metadata?
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Manfred Moser wrote:
On Saturday December 22 2007, Dalibor Topic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally agree with all your points. It would however be great
to have this as a goal in mind and work towards it in parallel as
you suggested. We are thinking along the same lines.
Great. Do
ones. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
experience with using maven to satisfy build
requirements, I think we'll
be able to make a more informed decision which of the three ways forward
on the second problem
to pick.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
highly unlikely that
their developers will
be able to agree on anything, in particular what a repository should
look like, so indirection
lets us support several of them without having to pick favorites.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers
builds to inform maven about our own jars.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
and setting the classes, etc. options
accordingly for how debian installs classpath).
Since jikes is fixed on arm, you should also be able to rebuild the
current deb for arm.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
is there any free java compiler with generics support in Debian? I
need it to package entagged. Please Cc: me when answering because I am
not subscribed to the list.
Yes, ecj.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java
it!
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
with
gcc 4.1.x for CVS head at http://www.kaffe.org/~robilad/gcc-4.1.rough.diff
I'll see if I can bring it down to just the necessary bits and pieces.
cheers,
dalibor topic
Cheers,
Michael
--
http://www.worldforge.org/
___
pkg-java-maintainers
I've checked in a patch to kaffe to add th4e missing String methods. It
will be in 1.1.7-rc2, that should be out tonight.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:49:36AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Regarding the zip implementation, I would not mind switching Kaffe over
to use the GNU Classpath java.util.zip implementation, if I can see that
it performs as well on the interpreter engine
,
dalibor topic
kind regards,
Timo Gerke
- --
I now declare the bazar for open!
Dinner for one, James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
.
As far as the non-technical side of the bug report goes, I'd suggest
that Erwin takes that discussion somewhere else. We're building a
universal operating system, and abusing the bug tracker for flamewars
does not help. Thank you.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Erwan David
problems with locking within kaffe's
core vm. I am not sure a small patch has gone in or would do :/
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg
Barry Hawkins wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
this may be fixed in 1.1.6-pre2/1.1.6 using ecj for building on arm (and
other platforms where jikes screws up royally, like mipsel). Needs to be
tried out.
Shouldn't we use ecj for all the arches?
Since it depends on gcj, I
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Barry Hawkins wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
this may be fixed in 1.1.6-pre2/1.1.6 using ecj for building on
arm (and
other platforms where jikes screws up royally, like mipsel).
Needs to be
tried out.
Shouldn't we use
this may be fixed in 1.1.6-pre2/1.1.6 using ecj for building on arm (and
other platforms where jikes screws up royally, like mipsel). Needs to be
tried out.
cheers,
dalibor topic
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
to invoke fastjar rather than
kaffe's own jar.
cheers,
dalibor topic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12.3.p4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages kaffe depends on:
ii kaffe-pthreads2:1.1.5-3
31 matches
Mail list logo
