Bug#881777: Upgrading libdap fixed it

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:36:39 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Patrick_Matth=c3=a4i?= wrote: > reassign #881777 frei0r-plugins > thanks > thanks. i'm very reluctant to add that dependency on frei0r-plugins directly, as most frei0r plugins won't use it at all, and (iirc) it pulls in a

Bug#886672: aeolus: German translation of package description is wrong

On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:29:04 +0100 Robert Kehl wrote: > Package: aeolus > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > > there is one sentence in the german translation of the package > description that needs to be corrected. > > Wrong sentence: > > Dieser

Bug#877656: kodi: supports insecure download of non-free addons

On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:08:17 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Felipe Sateler (2017-10-04 00:32:21) > > > > I think your patch mainly addresses issue number 2, doesn't it? Fixing > > issue 1 would require asking upstream to provide > >

Bug#847988: pd-libdir: does not respect current loader path

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:45:41 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?IOhannes_m_zm=c3=b6lnig_=28Debian/GNU=29?= wrote: > On 12/12/2016 10:06 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > please fix the loader, so it respects the 'path' argument. > > > afaict, this is fixed in the upstream-clone at >

Bug#768901: libmapper available upstream

given that libmapper-0.4 has been released somewhen in august, it might be good to include that? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#833722: ffmpeg: can hear music but no sound/dialogs from movie

just a random thought (without even trying to reproduce the problem): could it be that you have a multichannel soundcard (e.g. one that is capable of playing back 5.1 channels), but you only have connected two channels? chances are that the dialog signals are sent to some unconnected speakers,

Re: linuxsampler?

On 09/29/2015 04:49 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:29 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: >> it apparently is non-free, but is this the only reason? >> (i searched the net, but couldn't find anything) > > It's a

Re: linuxsampler?

On 09/29/2015 05:05 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> i'm aware of the exception, but thought that non-free might be ok. > [snip] >> This FAQ suggests to me that the clause is just void, but the wording >> is not very

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 09/16/2015 07:37 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> which leaves only these drumkits that have a free license (mostly some >> CC; and 'Lightning1024' says "Free!" whatever this means) >> - DeathMetal (sf) >> - circAfrique v4 >> - BJA_Pacific >> - The Black Pearl 1.0 >> - Gimme A Hand 1.0 >> -

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 09/16/2015 10:41 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Ok ... if we thinking packaging these files what about licensing? > There is already one bug opened ... > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773246 > > IOhannes can you suggest complete list of packages we could provide > and

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:29 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I am not very skilled with cdbs, but I believe I will get used by time. > As you and probably Adrian too are fine with control.in file ... I > would say lets use it. i added another note to README.source that explicit mentions control.in and how

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well will > (re-build and) upload it to unstable tonight. uploaded. i'll upload the revised version of "ardour3" as soon as "ardour" enters unstable. mfgdsar

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/13/2015 08:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> Should I edit control.in file and regenerate control file? >> >> This do the magic? >> DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL=yes fakeroot debian/rules clean > > I just added a README.source about that. thanks. > > You don't need to use CDBS - e.g.

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/12/2015 09:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-11 21:14 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> >> Sorry I am not still at my working machine .. :( ... busy day for me > > I finally get time to build ardour ... > > I: ardour: spelling-error-in-binary

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry > in ardour.manpages file > Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file but is there any harm in having them called "ardour4"? > > Now when we will have just one

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 10:38 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> There are also ardour4 entry in desktop file ... are they correct? >>> >> >> dunno, they look fine to me; >> do you have anything specific in mind. > > I just was not sure if binary now build is really ardour4 or just ardour > > ah i see.

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary >> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add >> "Provides" for those who need that? > > No sure about -i686 and -altivec i created transitional packages, as

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding >> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg >> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... > > That would be great! Thank you IOhannes! > well, done and pushed. btw,

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 09:34 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 09/10/2015 12:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> IOhannes can you please look at it? I am not sure if wouldn't mess it :( > > working on it. ok, pushed both ardour3 and ardour. needs testing of upgrading & coninstal

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 12:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > IOhannes can you please look at it? I am not sure if wouldn't mess it :( working on it. gfmadsr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

On 09/10/2015 11:40 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> it will loose the git packaging history of ardour3. > I don't think so (as explained above): > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/ardour3.git/log/ i *think* i meant that the ardour repository will not contain the history from the

Re: The blender Package

On 08/29/2015 09:31 PM, Sofus Rose wrote: Hello again, After reading many documents, I think I'd like to start gaining practical experience. So, naturally, I began trying to upgrade the blender package to the newest upstream version, 2.75a. It's proving a bit of a challenge, however; If you

Re: lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?

On 08/26/2015 12:28 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins. will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not present

Re: [mpg123-users] mpg123 version 1.22.4, re-enabling free format support

thanks for the clarification. makes total sense. fgmrdsa IOhannes On 08/13/2015 05:59 PM, Thomas Orgis wrote: Am Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:18:26 +0200 schrieb forum::für::umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at: while i haven't followed the bug that required a fix that breaks functionality you need,

Bug#767866: mediatomb: Mediatomb config uses lo interface, stopped my ps3 from recognizing it

Control: severity -1 normal thanks On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:40:37 -0500 Jon Sagotsky vala...@gmail.com wrote: Package: mediatomb Version: 0.12.1-7 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I ran apt-get dist-upgrade and then my PS3 stopped being able to see my mediatomb server. After a

Re: [SCM] x42-plugins/master: Exclude mipsel from build.

On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package. I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42

Re: Fwd: Introducing myself - Joël Krähemann

On 06/12/2015 03:27 PM, Joël Krähemann wrote: I've already done my first package for sure it needs to improved but this is it basically: http://gsequencer.org/packages/ags_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb running lintian on that packages gives 2 errors and 8 warnings, all of which should be fixed.

multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

hi, esp ross, i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain. should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some discussion? furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends*

Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

On 06/11/2015 09:44 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends* relationship. now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends' should be avoided as much as possible (in general). I think the web sentinel (task

Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a puredata task?) :) I don't think we need per-application-ecosystem metapackages. but right now the user does not have a possibility to install an entire ecosystem like Pd's.

Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: The blends machinery automatically demotes all Depends to Recommends. See the generated packages[1]. I'm not sure if Recommends are demoted to Suggests. looks like it does for non-existing packages (e.g. boodler in soundsynthesis). gfmrdsa

Re: multimedia-blends: policy question(s)

On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 11 June 2015 at 15:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the recording task, which will installs by (among other things): at least (at a first glance) 4

Re: giada - looper ready for upload

On 06/10/2015 01:08 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi all, giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my opinion ;) Is there any DD who is willing review it and if ok than upload. uploaded.thanks. fgmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 02/17/2015 01:22 PM, Tino Mettler wrote: I CCd the debian-multimedia list on Alioth. However, the archive seems to contain only autogenerated mails and spam, so I'm not sure if someone reads this list. Uploaded to unstable. thanks for your work to make Debian a better place. gfmdsar

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 05/27/2015 04:19 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: i have now created the (still empty) git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/linuxptp not empty any longer. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/linuxptp.git signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Fwd: Bug#786422: ITP: pd-iemtab -- Pd-objects for table manipulation

anyone interested in becoming an uploader for that one? packaging uses CDBS. i expect upstream to not release very often. fmgadsr IOhannes Forwarded Message Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig umlae...@debian.org * Package name: pd-iemtab

Fwd: RM: flumotion -- ROM; unmaintained upstream; depends on obsolete gstreamer0.10

just to let you know that i requested a package removal for 'flumotion'. gfmsadr IOhannes Forwarded Message Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal flumotion uses gstreamer0.10 which is to be removed from Debian. I contacted upstream about their plans to support

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to FFmpeg in Debian where did you get that impression from? btw, i find your email a bit too suggestive. gmsrd IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On 05/09/2015 02:46 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Hi IOhannes, On 09.05.2015 14:29, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to FFmpeg in Debian where did you get

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On 05/09/2015 04:34 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: It might have ended in some spam filter, at least I suspect that's the reason the mail didn't make it to the list. most mailman mailinglists do not like it, if you have tons of CCs in the mail (after all, mailinglists are there to prevent that

packaging: python-soundfile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi all, i would like to package python-soundfile [1], a python audio processing library wrapping libsndfile. i would prefer to do this under our team umbrella, so if anybody is interested please speak up. fgmasfrt IOhannes [1]

Re: packaging: python-soundfile

On 04/27/2015 12:13 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:11 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: i would like to package python-soundfile [1], a python audio processing library wrapping libsndfile. i would prefer to do this under our team umbrella, so

Re: Granting write access to all DDs to our git area

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-04-13 11:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2015-04-13 09:30:54) I think it makes a difference if we blindly trust fellow DDs or probably random newcomers with unchecked identities. That's a valid point. yes.

Bug#781095: pd-unauthorized: format list of contents and other small fixes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: tags -1 confirmed pending thanks On 2015-03-24 13:58, Daniele Forsi wrote: Package: pd-unauthorized Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, the list of objects contained in this package is reflown (as per the policy) and it's

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-19 14:46, Felipe Sateler wrote: I just saw that there is git-pq which seems to work similar. I'm not sure how gitpkg does the patch thing, but do note that gbp pq branches are not meant to be published: the export format are the

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

(oops, forgot to include tino, who might not be subscribed to p-m-m; sorry for the noise) On 02/17/2015 07:50 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: As for DDs: ales...@debian.org or umlae...@debian.org, we have even more in the multimedia team. I am happy to upload, but I cannot commit to reviewing the

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 02/17/2015 07:50 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: As for DDs: ales...@debian.org or umlae...@debian.org, we have even more in the multimedia team. I am happy to upload, but I cannot commit to reviewing the packaging on my own. If other members of the team help up reviewing the package, I am

multiple uploaders

due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would like to) enforce our 2 uploaders per package rule. i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single uploader (me, obviously). soundscaperenderer is anybody

Bug#768295: pd-osc-1.0-2 is outdated and buggy

Control: retitle -1 bug with depth 1 OSC address Control: tags -1 confirmed thanks On 11/06/2014 11:28 AM, Antoine Villeret wrote: When parsing OSC path with more than one slash ('/'), the float is not understood by a number box. to be precise, [routeOSC] will output a message with the

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On 10/07/2014 12:06 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2014, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: even if done after so long time and mean that project has been revived? IMHO Yes. With packaging the new release, we -- as Debian -- have merely done what is expected from us. By

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On 10/04/2014 04:26 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: What about dropped packages? Should we mention them? If yes can you start paragraph for them please?

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On 10/03/2014 09:54 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: Bump. I know that it's a quite boring thing to do but IMHO we'd do a great service to all our users by releasing an update on what they'll find on Jessie. thanks for taking the initiative. i'm having a bit of trouble on the wiki with the

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On 10/06/2014 10:40 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 10/03/2014 09:54 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: Bump. I know that it's a quite boring thing to do but IMHO we'd do a great service to all our users by releasing an update on what they'll find on Jessie. thanks for taking the initiative

Bug#672352: gmerlin doesn't start with segfault

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, thanks for the additional info. Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders none pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder none pn gmerlin-plugins-base none does the problem go away if you install any (or all) of these

Bug#672352: gmerlin doesn't start with segfault

On 2014-09-15 12:28, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: hi, thanks for the additional info. Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders none pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder none pn gmerlin-plugins-base none does the problem go away if you install any (or all

Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-07-29 03:20, Marco d'Itri wrote: if they are not drop in replacements, and it would also be a pain if higher up packages link-in both ffmpeg libav and some clashing symbols are present... This is why the new ffmpeg will use different

Re: Bug#729203: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist within Debian¹. as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like to have the choice which one to use. On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jul 28,

Re: yoshimi update

On 06/22/2014 07:02 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hello, does anybody on list understand why my watch file and uscan don't see latest update on sourceforge 1.2.2, but other releases yes? http://sourceforge.net/projects/yoshimi/files/1.2/ i found that the redirector sometimes needs some time. try

Re: Sponsorship/Review for package karlyriceditor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-05-26 17:46, forum::für::umläute wrote: with that i meant a repository hosted on debian infrastructure. most packaging repositories are hosted on alioth [1]. many alioth packaging teams such as pkg-multimedia (and to a lesser extent

sharing code between packages

hi, i'm seeking advice about how to deal with the following situation: we are currently maintaining an application-package (puredata for those interested), brought to use by upstream1. now some people (upstream2, unrelated to upstream1) have turned the application into a library (libpd), by

Bug#583787: src:frei0r: Some files are LGPL 2.1

Control: tags -1 pending,fixed-in-experimental Control: owner -1 umlae...@debian.org thanks for the report. while packaging frei0r-1.4 we have updated debian/copyright to DEP5 and have now a (hopefully) accurate picture of the various licenses and copyrights used. frei0r_1.4-1 is now in

Re: Sponsorship/Review for package karlyriceditor

On 05/19/2014 07:19 PM, Martin Steghöfer wrote: Just to bring this to your attention once more before moving on to other places in order to find a reviewer or sponsor. It would be very nice, if someone could have a look! here at least a review: your Vcs: cool that you are using git. but your

Re: soundscaperenderer_0.4.1~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 05/08/2014 01:57 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On Mon, 5 May 2014, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: if so, i would re-upload the package with the fixed debian/copyright. ok, so please go on. ok, thanks; uploaded. fgmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: soundscaperenderer_0.4.1~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 05/02/2014 03:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing BOOST license of ssr-0.4.1\apf\unit_tests\catch\catch.hpp to your debian/copyright. In addition ssr-0.4.1\data\MacOSX\dylibbundler\src\* is GPLv2+

Re: Time to orphan libquicktime?

On 03/17/2014 12:34 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: How are you? I hope you're doing well. thanks alessio for asking burkhard. it seems, that he did not include the list in his answer, so i forward it (with his permission): On 04/02/2014 06:23 PM, Burkhard Plaum wrote: Well I wouldn't consider it

real name (was: Re: Looking for libde265 package review / sponsor)

On 03/31/2014 12:19 PM, forum::für::umläute wrote: hi, argh, i did it again. sorry to not use my real name in the From: header. but i finally found the Correct Identity plugin for icedove, which should get my From address correctly for debian related emails. fgmards IOhannes signature.asc

RFU: gmerlin-encoders (was Re: RFU: gmerlin-avdecoder)

On 01/29/2014 06:30 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: you can find the package at: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/gmerlin-avdecoder if somebody with upload permissions could upload the package (or grant me

RFU: gmerlin-avdecoder

hi all, i've updated the packaging of gmerlin-avdecoder. the new package fixes two bugs, and makes the package lintian clean (again). the highlights from the changelog: * Bumped automake/aclocal to 1.11 (Closes: #724378) * Build-Depend on libtiff-dev rather than libtiff4-dev to allow

Re: becoming a Debian developer...

On 2013-12-19 15:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting IOhannes m zmoelnig (2013-12-19 12:50:47) now that i have become DM, i thought it probably time to do the last step and become DD as well. That's great news! [snip] so if you think me becoming a DD is feasible, it would be great if you

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-12-13 15:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: so what's the recommended (minimal) package to build PDFs from DOCs? I guess that'd be the package wv. Or if results of that is too ugly, then maybe unoconv. To check alternatives, install apt-xapian-index and run this command: $

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-12-16 18:36, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: while i keep trying with various packages (e.g. `antiword`, which doesn't like UTF-8 when outputting PDFs), i would welcome very much any *more* hints regarding this problem. this ought to be a common problem. two more ideas: - do not try

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-12-12 18:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: so does this mean that they have to do another release that includes the .doc file in the source-package? Yes: We need actual source, not just assurance that source exist. darn. i thought so. do we then have to actually *build* the pdf

priorority 'optional' vs 'extra'

i noticed that many packages maintained in the multimedia team have priority extra. doing a quick grep over all our packages that have 'extra' as priority and which are not 'dbg' packages (which probably *should* have priority 'extra'), gives me about 130 different binary packages, coming from

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-11-29 14:21, Felipe Sateler wrote: - I don't see the source for Dokumentation_German.pdf while i haven't contacted upstream yet (waiting for my holidays to finish, so i can talk to him personally), i'm pretty sure that the original M$word doc-file has been lost for about 10 years. also,

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-12-05 15:36, Felipe Sateler wrote: My interpretation of the DFSG is that in this case the source for Dokumentation_German.pdf is missing, because a pdf is not the preferred form of modification (or is it?). That would mean we need to strip it from the source tarball. hmm, well. so if

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-11-30 00:33, Felipe Sateler wrote: the only reason is, that the package doesn't use cdbs... if need be, i can switch the packaging system from dh to cdbs. It doesn't *need* to be.. but I think most pd object are using cdbs, so maintaining a consistent style is useful. Plus, the rules

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-11-21 22:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: hi fellow packagers, any takers for reviewing pd-iemlib? git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/pd-iemlib gfsmdar IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg

Re: pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

On 2013-11-29 14:21, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:22 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 2013-11-21 22:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: hi fellow packagers, any takers for reviewing pd-iemlib? Sorry, missed this. - Any particular reason you want

puredata-0.45.3-2 (was Re: Pd library loading)

On 2013-11-07 19:49, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 2013-11-07 18:09, Felipe Sateler wrote: Yes, indeed. However, I can't get it to run. Installing the package and trying to create an ambi_rot object fails with couldn't

Re: sponsor needed for RC-bug (was Re: Bug#728146: pd-iemambi)

On 2013-11-07 18:09, Felipe Sateler wrote: Yes, indeed. However, I can't get it to run. Installing the package and trying to create an ambi_rot object fails with couldn't create error. FWIW, this happens with the version in unstable too. This is puredata 0.45.3-1. ah yes. i probably should

Re: PD library loading

On 2013-11-07 19:49, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 2013-11-07 18:09, Felipe Sateler wrote: Yes, indeed. However, I can't get it to run. Installing the package and trying to create an ambi_rot object fails with couldn't

sponsor needed for RC-bug (was Re: Bug#728146: pd-iemambi)

hi all, On 2013-11-01 15:59, Robert Millan wrote: As far as I can see, starting with kfreebsd-kernel-headers 9.2~3 the macros you want are defined unconditionally (by way of #include endian.h). Maybe you just need a versioned B-D? i've updated the pd-iemambi to contain a versioned B-D to

Bug#728146: pd-iemambi: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: #error No byte order defined

On 2013-11-01 15:59, Robert Millan wrote: On 01/11/2013 15:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: anyhow, i'd rather have the problem fixed. so what is the portable solution? should i simply define `__BSD_VISIBLE` for kfreebsd-*? No, that's an internal macro. Applications are not supposed to provide

Re: Bug#715909: marked as done ([Mayhem] Bug report on pd-flite: flite.pd_linux crashes with exit status 139)

On 08/16/13 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Severity: minor Tags: wontfix This is an invalid bug. Your script is trying to run a dynamic library plugin as an executable. That will always crash. well yes, this is why Debian policy states that: Shared libraries should not be

Re: Bug report on pd-readanysf: readanysf~.pd_linux crashes with exit status 139

hi fellow multimedia team, On 06/26/13 19:48, Alexandre Rebert wrote: Hi, We found a crash in readanysf~.pd_linux contained in the pd-readanysf package. You are being contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of pd-readanysf. the listed bug (and a number of related bugs

Re: Bug report on pd-readanysf: readanysf~.pd_linux crashes with exit status 139

On 06/28/13 16:08, Felipe Sateler wrote: Added myself to uploaders, modified the changelog a bit, and uploaded it. cool thanks. please don't forget to push your changes. fgmasdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

LAC 2013: the Linux Audio Conference - Call for Participation

sorry for please We are happy to announce the next issue of the Linux Audio Conference (LAC), May 9-12, 2013 @ IEM, the Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics, in Graz, Austria. The Linux Audio Conference is an international conference that brings together musicians, sound artists,

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2011 11:46 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: If someone wants to have a look and eventually upload it? i cannot upload, but i can have a look: debian/control: current standards-version is 3.9.2 debian/control: Uploaders field has a stray

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2011 04:19 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: debian/control: any reason why you are so picky about the debhelper version? I'm using short-form dh with dh overrides. Lintian tells me

~dfsg vs +dfsg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, recently on debian-mentors@, i was asked why i would version a dfsg-repackaged source package as version~dfsg-1 (which is sorted before version-1), rather than version+dfsg-1 (which is sorted after version-1) i thought long and hard, but in

Re: please upload pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-maxlib, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/25/2011 05:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-maxlib, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg do you plan to get rid of those lintian warnings as well? W: pd-cxc:

Bug#616080: gmerlin: segfault on start

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/05/2011 05:43 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 04.05.2011 04:40, schrieb Alessio Treglia: Setting severity to minor, read my previous comment: this bug is not reproducible if accelerated graphics is enabled. I disagree. A segfault is a

Re: please upload: pd-pdogg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'd like to keep the short-form dh packages i think everybody now agrees that what we are discussing should be irrelevant of whether a specific package uses dh or cdbs or whatever. that I've

Re: hold uploading pd-cxc, pd-ekext, pd-bsaylor, pd-markex, pd-mjlib, pd-sigpack, pd-smlib, pd-windowing, and pd-pdogg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2011 06:23 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Hey IOhannes, Thanks for fixing these bugs. I'd appreciate it if you would talk to me as the maintainer of these packages oh, i thought those packages are maintained as a team by

Re: pd-iemambi request for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/2011 09:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: Uploaded. thanks. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

pd-iemnet: request for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi fellow packagers, pd-iemnet had an FTBFS report filed, which i hopefully fixed and pushed to git://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/pd-iemnet (there are 2 more changes: i shortened the VCS-stanzas to not contain the trailing stuff and removed the

pd-iemambi request for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 dear fellow packagers, another package which i feel esp. responsible for and which is maintained collaboratively had an FTBFS filed: pd-iemambi i have hopefully fixed the underlying problem, and pushed it along with several minor fixes, namely: - -

Re: Adopting Ecasound

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/2011 03:24 AM, Joel Roth wrote: Alessandro and others, Does someone know what to do with these? --snip-- Now running lintian... W: python-ecasound2.2: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/pyshared/pyeca.py W:

Re: pkg-multimedia-commits - not comming messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/2011 09:54 PM, Jaromír Mike? wrote: Hi there, I am not getting emails from pkg-multimedia-commits. I checked my subscription if something was going wrong, but nothing unusual there. Any suggestion how this can be fixed? regard

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder ready (2nd try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/16/2011 12:24 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: 2011/1/14 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at: i think i fixed the remaining issues with gmerlin-avdecoder. package appears to be lintian clean. Should not we upload gmerlin first? yes of course.

  1   2   >