---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102732/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
Hello,
for the moment the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102304/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2011, 10:39 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma and Aaron J
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/#review6904
---
Hey!
Even though I'm not anymore the maintainer of the quicklau
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/#review6906
---
First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirma
Hi,
as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7
would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing in
the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a huge
mistake, for several reasons (the "TL/DR" crowd can stop rig
> On Sept. 29, 2011, 11:55 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirmation only
> > go for a specific widget? This introduces inconsistence in the UI that
> > leads to more data loss (the next time a user deletes a widget, she'll
> > expec
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have a
> KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7.
Since almost exactly 2 years we (esp. the promo team) are communicating that
Platform/Frameworks, Applications and Workspaces ar
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you draw here is
> quite an exaggeration of what is actually happening.
>
> kdelibs 4.7 is meant to be frozen for new features, but not for bugfixes.
> Bugfix releases of kdelibs-4.7 ha
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
...
> > The KDE Frameworks 5.0 development is not meant to take forever. In fact
> > I think it's meant to be finished around early 2012, which would leave
> > us with a frozen kdelibs for on
On Thursday 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7
> would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing
> in the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> > From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you draw here
> > is
> > quite an exaggeration of what is actually happening.
> >
> > kdelibs 4.7 is meant to be froz
Hi all,
the work on the new screen locker implementation is nearly done (I can unlock
again :-) and that brings me to an issue
where I wanted to have more opinions: screensaver.
What's important to see: screen locker and screen saver are two different
things mixed together for historic reasons
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the work on the new screen locker implementation is nearly done (I can
> unlock again :-) and that brings me to an issue where I wanted to have
> more opinions: screensaver.
>
+1
>
> But when compositing is turned off, you curr
Am Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:14:59 +0200
schrieb Martin Gräßlin :
> But when compositing is turned off, you currently get the plain old
> implementation including screen savers. And I don't want to change
> that code.
Seconding Marco: "Why?"
> So there are some solutions:
> * drop screensaver support
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> * drop screensaver support altogether, probably would create some troubles
> as evil KDE removed screensavers
> * add Plasma widget support to new screen locker implementation but drop
> screensaver support (same problems as first option)
I don't think these are acceptable.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102404/#review6930
---
Ping? Can I commit this bugfix to the KDE/4.7 branch?
- Kevin K
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> So there are some solutions:
> * drop screensaver support altogether, probably would create some troubles as
> evil KDE removed screensavers
> * add Plasma widget support to new screen locker implementation but drop
> screensaver support
> But when compositing is turned off, you currently get the plain old
> implementation including screen savers. And I don't want to change that
> code.
I'm with Marco on this one.
I don't think having two totally different code paths and user exp is a
good idea.
> * drop screensaver support al
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102698/
---
(Updated Sept. 30, 2011, 6:25 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102698/#review6939
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aaron J. Seigo
On Sept. 30, 2011, 6:25 a
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 14:28:36 Oliver Friedrich wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm writing an applet. Therefore I call in init() configChanged() which
> calls "KConfigGroup cg=config()".
> cg.entryMap() should return the entries I put in before.
> The problem is that the entryMap is empty until ini
21 matches
Mail list logo
