Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/ --- (Updated May 8, 2014, 7:17 a.m.) Review request for Plasma and Thomas Pfe

Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/ --- (Updated May 8, 2014, 7:16 a.m.) Review request for Plasma and Thomas Pfe

Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

> On May 7, 2014, 9:31 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Okay, usability review. Some recommendations, some questions: > > - This right now only has these options because adding wallpapers or > > Plasmoids simply wasn't implemented yet and will get more settings once > > they are implemented, ri

Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/#review57524 --- Okay, usability review. Some recommendations, some questions:

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-desktop_master_qt5 #146

See Changes: [notmart] take into account plasmoid.availableScreenRect -- Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 4 (PACKAG

[plasma-shell] [Bug 328593] Dual screen has regressed in plasma-shell

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328593 Aleix Pol changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aleix...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Aleix Pol ---

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #163

See Changes: [hein] Expose a little more of GroupManager to QML. -- Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 (PACKAGER

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-desktop_master_qt5 #145

See Changes: [hein] Add top-level functions to test for and add launchers. [hein] Add top-level function to symlink an URL into the current dir. [hein] Actions to add apps to the panel/desktop containments and the task manager.

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

El Dimecres, 7 de maig de 2014, a les 10:11:37, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > Hi all, > > I need some advice. The new GTK+ release For those that don't follow much the GTK+ world, which release number is that? Cheers, Albert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #162

See Changes: [aleixpol] Adopt libkscreen to get information of the screens [aleixpol] Make it possible to move a DesktopView from a screen to another [aleixpol] Make it possible to set a screen to DesktopView and PanelView [ale

[plasma-shell] [Bug 328593] Dual screen has regressed in plasma-shell

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328593 Martin Klapetek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mklape...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Martin

Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

> On May 7, 2014, 5:41 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > I think this should go into the plasma-desktop repository, under kcms/ > > (there's already more ksmserver kcm code there). > > > > The spinboxes, I don't find overly useful. Perhaps a combobox with some > > default values to pick from?

Re: Review Request 118022: Replace hacky access to the declarative engine by a PmcRuntime class

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118022/#review57506 --- This review has been submitted with commit 4e4797f4a15973fc9b

Re: Review Request 118022: Replace hacky access to the declarative engine by a PmcRuntime class

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118022/ --- (Updated May 7, 2014, 4:05 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mark

Re: Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/#review57503 --- I think this should go into the plasma-desktop repository, und

Review Request 118038: Bring back a KCM for the screen locker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/ --- Review request for Plasma and Thomas Pfeiffer. Repository: plasma-workspa

[kde-build-metadata] /: Introduce libkscreen as a feature of Plasma Workspace

Git commit 1cb38cd86f50424574e246b1816f72274c5799ce by Aleix Pol. Committed on 07/05/2014 at 15:08. Pushed by apol into branch 'master'. Introduce libkscreen as a feature of Plasma Workspace The Plasma Workspace plasmashell+libkscreen branch was merged, now it depends on libkscreen. CCMAIL: plas

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #161

See -- Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 (PACKAGER LINBUILDER) in workspace

Re: Review Request 118017: Fix expansion of ~

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118017/ --- (Updated May 7, 2014, 4:06 p.m.) Status -- This change has been disc

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-desktop_master_qt5 #144

See Changes: [notmart] don't put stuff under panels -- [...truncated 343 lines...] another target with the same name already exists. The existing target is a custom target created in sou

Re: Review Request 117900: Cleanup of screenlocker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117900/ --- (Updated May 7, 2014, 12:41 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 117900: Cleanup of screenlocker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117900/#review57490 --- This review has been submitted with commit ece22ef8e8918be152

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 14:25:23 David Edmundson wrote: > Aha. Found the pattern. > > I had launched with compositing off, and then turned it on. toggling > on/off afterwards works fine as you've stated GTK doesn't detect this > properly. > > So hopefully we can ask GTK to pretend compositing is

Re: Plasma 5?

On 06.05.2014 17:27, Mario Fux wrote: Aren't the version number mostly important for bug reporting and there they are extracted automatically? Not only for bug reporting but whenever there is a problem. I don't care what version of a piece of software I run, until the moment when something do

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

Aha. Found the pattern. I had launched with compositing off, and then turned it on. toggling on/off afterwards works fine as you've stated GTK doesn't detect this properly. So hopefully we can ask GTK to pretend compositing is off when not in gnome, and with Oxygen the header doesn't even look to

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

> > Martin could you try setting this and see which bugs remain? > > It seems all things are fixed, besides a slightly silly double title. For me, oxygen does not fix the shadows. https://plus.google.com/photos/+Ivan%C4%8Cuki%C4%87/albums/6010311973653118369

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 14:01:35 Jens Reuterberg wrote: > The suggestion was "Try asking mclasen on irc.gnome.org #gtk+ channel." > > As for who asks as long as it's no one heavily involved in the issue but > percieved as neutral but with the technical skill to explain it as well as > understand

Re: Re: Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 13:48:23 David Edmundson wrote: > gtk3 3.12.1-2 > > oxygen-gtk is git master. strange, Hugo confirmed to me that he is able to reproduce the issues with gtk-3.12.1 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

The suggestion was "Try asking mclasen on irc.gnome.org #gtk+ channel." As for who asks as long as it's no one heavily involved in the issue but percieved as neutral but with the technical skill to explain it as well as understand their suggestions it should be fine right? __

Re: Fwd: [kconfig] src/core: Store app config file in ~/.config//rc

On Monday 05 May 2014 11:45:22 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2014, David Faure wrote: > > > does KSharedConfig::openConfig("confignamerc") now tries in ~/.config or > > > in ~/.config/kde.org ? (supposing the domain is set) > > > > I reverted the change for now. > > ok, so i will delay a

Re: Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

gtk3 3.12.1-2 oxygen-gtk is git master. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 13:21:58 David Edmundson wrote: > It seems changing the GTK style to Oxygen fixes a lot of the visual > problems. Kwin is doing the decoration and the borders. I don't get the > shadows with compositing on/off. > > http://imgur.com/5aiDUFq > > Martin could you try setting

Re: Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 12:53:51 David Edmundson wrote: > > I don't think that it's helpful to set up any talk between me and GNOME > > devs. They know that I don't like CSD. > > That's not even trying. Don't be that guy. Well I tried. I wrote several blog posts back in 2010 showing the issues i

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 13:21:58 David Edmundson wrote: > It seems changing the GTK style to Oxygen fixes a lot of the visual > problems. Kwin is doing the decoration and the borders. I don't get the > shadows with compositing on/off. > > http://imgur.com/5aiDUFq > > Martin could you try setting

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

It seems changing the GTK style to Oxygen fixes a lot of the visual problems. Kwin is doing the decoration and the borders. I don't get the shadows with compositing on/off. http://imgur.com/5aiDUFq Martin could you try setting this and see which bugs remain? It seems all things are fixed, besides

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

> I don't think that it's helpful to set up any talk between me and GNOME > devs. They know that I don't like CSD. That's not even trying. Don't be that guy. David ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 12:37:32 Jens Reuterberg wrote: > I have a pretty good report with Andreas Nilsson and he knows all the Gnome > devs and they know him so that might be a good way in... Should I try to > contact him and perhaps set up some kind of talk between one of the devs and > you Mart

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

I have a pretty good report with Andreas Nilsson and he knows all the Gnome devs and they know him so that might be a good way in... Should I try to contact him and perhaps set up some kind of talk between one of the devs and you Martin? See if there is something that can be worked out that way?

Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, > > I need some advice. The new GTK+ release introduced and enforces > client-side- > decorations (CSD) and that is causing severe compatibility problems with > Plasma Workspaces (especially the stable release which we cannot adjust

Re: Re: Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

On Wednesday 07 May 2014 11:24:03 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2014 10:11:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > * A hung window can no longer be closed or moved. Technical explanation: > > there is a ping protocol to detect hung applications. KWin only sends ping > > requests when the window is

Re: Plasma 5?

Hi Jos, On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Jos Poortvliet wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2014 19:25:51 Martin Graesslin wrote: >> On Monday 05 May 2014 17:56:04 Ivan ?uki? wrote: >> > Jens: >> > > the best option is to simply go with "Plasma by KDE" >> > >> > and >> > >> > > "So what version am I running

Re: Review Request 118017: Fix expansion of ~

> On May 6, 2014, 10:01 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > See my commit b988ccda0f741eb5475210266f887d7fdf6f8115 in kio-extras. > > > > Alexander Richardson wrote: > Okay, I guess this review can be dropped then, right? > > David Faure wrote: > Yes, I think so. Feel free to commit the unit t

Re: Review Request 118017: Fix expansion of ~

> On May 6, 2014, 10:01 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > See my commit b988ccda0f741eb5475210266f887d7fdf6f8115 in kio-extras. > > > > Alexander Richardson wrote: > Okay, I guess this review can be dropped then, right? Yes, I think so. Feel free to commit the unit tests though, that's always go

Compatibility problems with latest GTK+ applications

Hi all, I need some advice. The new GTK+ release introduced and enforces client-side- decorations (CSD) and that is causing severe compatibility problems with Plasma Workspaces (especially the stable release which we cannot adjust any more). I'll give a list of issues below. I'm not sure what w

Re: Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w19

On Tuesday 06 May 2014 17:03:40 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 06 May 2014 15:37:05 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > News > > - beta 2 is tagged and being packaged by distros with release due thursday > > - it is hoped to make a Plasma beta on friday based on Beta 2 > > - new schedule up at http://com