Oops, I meant:
> But I have prioritized the reduction of effort required to create the new
> page, just by cloning another page in https://www.opendesktop.org/ .
___
Plasma-devel
bsections shown, and probably it
would overload the structure.
I made my proposal of sections and subsections based on the language, and
nobody said anything, but of course it is open to suggestions and
contributions. So you can make a detailed proposal of sections and
subsections, if you wish. (
No answer for now :-(
I have re-sent the message directly to their email account, instead of by
web form.
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 4:05 PM
From: kdea <k@mail.com>
To: plasma-devel@kde.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: kde-libs.org, a repository of contributed libraries
I'm copyin
app) to
http://qt-apps.org/ or to http://kde-apps.org/ , the page will
suggest to visit the new web ( http://qt-kde-libs.org/ ) to upload the
libraries contained in the app.
What do you think on this proposal? Would it be useful for the developer
community? (and so for the user com
I will ask to
http://opendesktop.org/ admins next weekend.
Thank you
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
libraries, classified by cathegories:
Qt 5 C++ libs
Qt 5 QML libs
Qt 5 C++/QML libs
Plasma 5 C++ libs
Plasma 5 QML libs
etc.
instead of having everything in one or two cathegories and mixed with app
cathegories.
Thank you
kdea
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 at 1:03 AM
From: "
me idea. I'm happy to know that
plasma hackers had same idea as me :-)
Thank you
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
a repository/bazaar,
easy to use by all developers, and without any filtering.
The reason of the success of "http://kde-apps.org; is the freedom of use.
Same would apply to a repository of libraries.
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
em, by separating the code from the main program and by
uploading the library to the repository.
> > - It seems to be an index of libraries, not a repository of libraries.
> It can be whatever we like. It's free software and it's KDE.
Ok, let's go :-)
kdea
_
be easily adapted to the
proposal.
Thank you
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 at 1:22 AM
From: "Aleix Pol" <aleix...@kde.org>
To: "plasma-devel@kde.org" <plasma-devel@kde.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: kde-libs.org, a repository of contributed libraries
On Sun, May 1, 20
On Monday, December 14, 2015 21:54:02 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I'm very reluctant to add generic file I/O to our QML API, as that is going
> to make it very hard to secure it later on. We haven't redone the file I/O
> portions for that reason.
Personally I don't see much difference between a
Hi. One week ago I asked a question at forum.kde.org, but nobody responded, so
I'm now trying here in the mail list, please redirect me to the appropiate list
if this one is not the correct one. I'm copying the question...
Hi, I'm creating a QML plasmoid that will write data to a file in disk.
12 matches
Mail list logo
