On Monday 29 March 2010 21:02:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> thoughts?
I don't agree with the "PMC should target notebooks" as primary usecase bit. I
really
think that this thing should be developed to have its UI run on a TV,
preferably HD-
Ready or Full-HD resolution. Those devices tend to be eas
2010/3/30 Sebastian Kügler
> On Monday 29 March 2010 21:02:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > thoughts?
>
> I don't agree with the "PMC should target notebooks" as primary usecase
> bit. I really
> think that this thing should be developed to have its UI run on a TV,
> preferably HD-
> Ready or Full-HD
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> (*) I've played around with a wiimote last weekend and now have a Qt-style
> class that can be used to interact with the features of a wiimote,
> buttons, LEDs, accelerometers and haptic feedback at this point. I've got
> myself a copy of O'Reilly
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:00:27 Alessandro Diaferia wrote:
> > (*) I've played around with a wiimote last weekend and now have a
> > Qt-style class that
> > can be used to interact with the features of a wiimote, buttons, LEDs,
> > accelerometers
> > and haptic feedback at this point. I've got my
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:10:46 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > (*) I've played around with a wiimote last weekend and now have a
> > Qt-style class that can be used to interact with the features of a
> > wiimote, buttons, LEDs, accelerometers and hapti
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:12:04 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:00:27 Alessandro Diaferia wrote:
> > > (*) I've played around with a wiimote last weekend and now have a
> > > Qt-style class that
> > > can be used to interact with the features of a wiimote, buttons, LEDs,
> >
Hey everybody,
I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
screens right down to 5" screens. At the moment we use a top panel for
playback control (and mode switching) and will use a bottom panel for
displaying information about media. The bottom panel might be reusable
for a
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:22:16 Christophe Olinger wrote:
> I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
> screens right down to 5" screens. At the moment we use a top panel for
> playback control (and mode switching) and will use a bottom panel for
> displaying information a
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
> screens right down to 5" screens. At the moment we use a top panel for
> playback control (and mode switching) and will use a bottom panel for
i don't think
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> Hey everybody,
>>
>> I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
>> screens right down to 5" screens. At the moment we use a top panel for
>> playback control (and mo
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> >> Hey everybody,
> >>
> >> I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
> >> screens right down to 5" screens.
A Terça, 30 de Março de 2010 12:17:03 Sebastian Kügler você escreveu:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:12:04 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 13:00:27 Alessandro Diaferia wrote:
> > > > (*) I've played around with a wiimote last weekend and now have a
> > > > Qt-style class that
>
2010/3/30 Marco Martin
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> > >> Hey everybody,
> > >>
> > >> I think it will be really difficult to have the UI scale from 50"
>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> >> Hey everybody,
>> >>
>> >> I think it will be really difficult to have
Hallo Nuno,
I actually took your mocks in the MOCKS folder in SVN for the basic
UI. One top panel with controls, one bottom panel with information
(like a music anlayzer for example). In the middle a browser with a
big grid layout of our items. What would be cool is a mockup of a Home
Screen for P
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> >> >> Hey every
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
>> >> > On Tuesda
Hi list,
I'm new here, so please be indulgent :)
- "Marco Martin" a écrit :
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Marco Martin
> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ma
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:55 PM, wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm new here, so please be indulgent :)
So am I :-)
>
>
> - "Marco Martin" a écrit :
>
>> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Marco Martin
>> wrote:
>> > > On Tuesday 30 March 201
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm new here, so please be indulgent :)
>
> > i fear this is just useless code duplication, really.
> > for this fullscreen menu you need exactly the same functionality of
> > the
> > browser.
>
> I might misunderstood the aim of
On Tuesday 30 March 2010, Christophe Olinger wrote:
> >
> > i fear this is just useless code duplication, really.
> > for this fullscreen menu you need exactly the same functionality of the
> > browser.
>
> Wouldn't it just be different startup models?
>
>
> (see ugly mockup here: general home
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2010 21:02:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> thoughts?
>
> I don't agree with the "PMC should target notebooks" as primary usecase bit.
> I really
> think that this thing should be developed to have its UI run on a TV,
> pre
- "todd rme" a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sebastian Kügler
> wrote:
> > On Monday 29 March 2010 21:02:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >> thoughts?
> >
> > I don't agree with the "PMC should target notebooks" as primary
> usecase bit. I really
> > think that this thing should be d
Hello,
Whoa, just been off for few hours and so much discussion! Too bad
I arrived late :P
Christohpe, as Marco said, we will be having the Browser display the
list of plugins (and hence modes) anyway, so we can maximize it to the
whole screen and kind of use it as the Home applet. But yes, if
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:59:54 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> Whoa, just been off for few hours and so much discussion! Too bad
> I arrived late :P
>
> Christohpe, as Marco said, we will be having the Browser display the
> list of plugins (and hence modes) anyway, so we can maximize it to the
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:56:44 daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> - "todd rme" a écrit :
> > I don't think focusing this on HD devices is necessarily a good move.
> > There are still a huge number of standard-definition TV's out there
> > and there probably will be for some time.
> >
> I agree, + n
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:59:54 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
>> Whoa, just been off for few hours and so much discussion! Too bad
>> I arrived late :P
>>
>> Christohpe, as Marco said, we will be having the Browser display the
>> list o
On March 30, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> that "home applet" if you want it really isolated could be a different
> containment, so would be a totally standaloe fullscreen thing, but i don't
> think i like it.
it can almost certainly be run in the same, simple "full screen" containment
that the ful
On March 30, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010, daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> > I might misunderstood the aim of the "browser", but I don't think this
> > will be code duplication : you don't browse Music the same way you
> > browse Movies or TV Shows, do you ?
>
> yes i do, what c
On March 30, 2010, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > The thing can run on a conventional notebook, or netbook, or whatever
> > hardware you want it to, the important things when using a TV as output
> > device are:
> >
> > - input: mice don'
On March 30, 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:56:44 daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> > - "todd rme" a écrit :
> > > I don't think focusing this on HD devices is necessarily a good move.
> > > There are still a huge number of standard-definition TV's out there
> > > and the
I'll try to update the wiki page today adding the things we discussed
here and also the StateMachine Rewriting.
I'll get some hacking time maybe in the evening but I'll make sure to
learn all about StateMachines before that.
Cheerioh
Chris
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrot
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2010 21:02:06 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> thoughts?
>
> I don't agree with the "PMC should target notebooks" as primary usecase bit.
> I really
> think that this thing should be developed to have its UI run on a TV,
> pr
Hi guys,
- "Christophe Olinger" a écrit :
> I'll try to update the wiki page today adding the things we discussed
> here and also the StateMachine Rewriting.
About the top bar discussion, I would strongly recommend not to do that. A menu
(or whatever you call it, for me it's just a menu)
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 09:37:30 Alexis Ménard wrote:
> > The key is really to support commodity hardware, things people already
> > have or can get rather inexpensively and turn it into a media center
> > with little effort (basically install PMC, and hook up the TV to it).
>
> And why not tar
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
>
> About the top bar discussion, I would strongly recommend not to do that. A
> menu (or whatever you call it, for me it's just a menu) has to be the same
> everywhere.
I do not really agree here. When viewing pictures, I do not neet a
seek slider and
Hi there,
Thanks for your answer Christophe,
- "Christophe Olinger" a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
>
> >
> > About the top bar discussion, I would strongly recommend not to do
> that. A menu (or whatever you call it, for me it's just a menu) has to
> be the same ev
On March 31, 2010, daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> menu (or whatever you call it, for me it's just a menu) has to be the same
> everywhere.
it isn't a menu, it's a contextual controls bar.
it can't be the same everywhere, since neither the context is consistent nor
could we fit everything on there wit
On March 31, 2010, daithe...@free.fr wrote:
> I'd rather put the whole "mode access" to a dedicated panel that wouldn't
> change.
this is the home page.
> And keep the controls in the top bar or wherever you want. (I'm
that's the idea.
> still not convinced that a common control bar is the bes
39 matches
Mail list logo
