On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> BTW, as this page isn't updated in last 4 years, I volunteer to update
> it regarding app names; KOffice and some of its apps do not exist
> anymore.
Oops, I didn't see this before doing some of that. However, I hesitate
to change any of t
BTW, as this page isn't updated in last 4 years, I volunteer to update
it regarding app names; KOffice and some of its apps do not exist
anymore.
On 6 January 2015 at 17:46, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 14:11:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> > Does that make sense to everyone?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Mario Fux wrote:
> > Looking at the wiki, it says "KDE Plasma *". Originally we went for
> "Plasma
> > by KDE" format
> > to get further from the idea that Plasma = KDE and make the rebranding
> > clearer.
> > Was that dropped? Or just forgotten?
>
> I think neith
Am Dienstag, 06. Januar 2015, 17.53:57 schrieb Martin Klapetek:
Morning
In general I think the first proposal by Thomas is quite good and agree with
notmart and Co, that we can't fix every little detail as these are different
levels of abstraction.
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Pfei
On Monday 05 January 2015, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > For example in release announcement we'd talk about the Plasma 5.2
> > release and when there are shell specific changes we could write "Plasma
> > Desktop now has addition X"
> >
> > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publi
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 14:11:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publish it
> > > and
> > > where should we announce it?
> >
> > This nomenclature sounds fine to my ears. Does th
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 14:11:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publish it
> > and
> > where should we announce it?
>
> This nomenclature sounds fine to my ears. Does this need announcement? I
> think the Dot editors have some wiki pages
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 18:23:07 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed that it
> was unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma Desktop
> specifically, so we thought it would make sense to clarify this.
>
> Therefore, we w
El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 01:34:17, Aleix Pol va escriure:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed that it
> > was unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma Desktop
On Monday 05 January 2015 01:34:17 Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed
that it
> > was unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma
Desktop
> > specifically
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed that it was
> unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma Desktop
> specifically, so we thought it would make sense to clarify this.
>
> Therefor
Hi everyone,
while writing up a vision for Plasma interaction, the VDG noticed that it was
unclear exactly what terms to use when referring to Plasma Desktop
specifically, so we thought it would make sense to clarify this.
Therefore, we went ahead and drafted some communication guidelines I'd li
12 matches
Mail list logo
