+1 for disabling that.
czw., 10 lut 2022 o 07:23 Ed Merks napisał(a):
> Can we please turn off this "Genie" that does this to open bugs? I've
> asked about this before and I really don't like it. This time I want to
> really make it stop. I think such a behavior creates a really bad
>
> I would bring that for voting at the PMC.
Thanks Alex.
> I'm a bit disappointed that we don't see real effort in improving the
> situation with bugs and gerrits though.
Sure, ho one is happy with that, but that's the problem of resources we have
since "big players" moved to other
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:55 PM Alexander Fedorov <
alexander.fedo...@arsysop.ru> wrote:
> +1 to stop auto close, because it negates a lot of human effort invested
> in each bugzilla record. It is strange to expect any new contributors while
> we just through their work to the trash bin.
>
I
+1 to stop auto close, because it negates a lot of human effort invested
in each bugzilla record. It is strange to expect any new contributors
while we just through their work to the trash bin.
I wonder what Committer Representative role stands for if the message
could be claimed as "just not
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:42 AM Ed Merks wrote:
> And while you might not keep lists, auto closing issues reminds not just
> you that attention is needed but it reminds the users that you don't keep a
> list. And it might will tell the users that you don't really care about
> backlogs of
I dislike stupid robots judging human contributions which come from heart. I
also dislike triage. As long as a bug is not planned with target Milestone and
(voluntary) assignee it won’t be done anyways. But still it is a valid report
that later might gain attention.
I do keep lists:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW_status=ASSIGNED_status=REOPENED_status=RESOLVED=Modeling=releng=doc=website=Core=Doc=Edit=Mapping=Tools=Xcore=XML%2FXMI_id=21197880=resolution%2Cbug_id=EMF_format=advanced=---=FIXED
Please consider the opinions of your committers and contributors as at
least relatively important. We're explaining to you what is important
to us and why we feel that way. We don't really so much appreciate our
opinions being dismissed as not important to you. We have higher
expectations
FWIW, I personally like the "reminder" about old bugs I once cared about
and then have forgotten about, and that often allows me to take a decision
of whether I'm fine seeing them closed (sometimes marking them as resolved
or not important any more), or whether I need to reopen them with more
/aloskutov
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2022 um 10:52 Uhr
Von: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
An: "Eclipse platform general developers list."
Betreff: Re: [platform-dev] Fwd: [Bug 305081] [api] IInstallableUnit#getFilter is marked noReference
On Thu, Feb 10, 2
> You nailed it! It's pointless discussion whether bugs are autoclosed or
not aka stay open without anyone looking into it or being closed without
anyone looking into it.
> What's important is who will triage and fix bugs, look into gerrits and
etc.? I'm very interested in the later discussion and
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:43 AM Rolf Theunissen
wrote:
> I fully agree. In fact, I consider any bug that is closed and marked as
> 'stalebug' as open.
>
> Also, back in the day there seemed to be a different triage process, and
> correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that bugs that are marked
I fully agree. In fact, I consider any bug that is closed and marked as
'stalebug' as open.
Also, back in the day there seemed to be a different triage process, and
correct me if I am wrong, but it seems that bugs that are marked as being
triaged are not auto-closed. At least some very old bugs
I agree. It’s happened to many bugs I raised over the years even when they are
provably still valid, and it gives a really bad impression to end users for
limited gain.
Alex
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Feb 2022, at 06:49, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
>
> +1 for disabling this.
>
>> Am
+1 for disabling this.
Am 10.02.22 um 07:45 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:
Yes, please.
I believe PMC once decided it would be a great idea to have less bugs open, so
I would ask PMC to discuss the success of this practice once again, we should
be able to reiterate on our processes.
I've
Yes, please.
I believe PMC once decided it would be a great idea to have less bugs open, so
I would ask PMC to discuss the success of this practice once again, we should
be able to reiterate on our processes.
I've complained https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jdt-dev/msg01419.html already (no
Can we please turn off this "Genie" that does this to open bugs? I've
asked about this before and I really don't like it. This time I want to
really make it stop. I think such a behavior creates a really bad
impression, i.e., that we manage bugs so poorly that we need a bot that
times them
17 matches
Mail list logo
