Re: w32codec updated

2012-08-09 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/8/10 Caleb Maclennan : > 2012/8/10 Bartosz Świątek : >> should be punished > > This isn't about punishment. It's about civility and cooperation. Ok, I chose the wrong word. Leaving the devel list should then be treated equally to resigning from RW. > Pe

Re: w32codec updated

2012-08-09 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/8/9 Caleb Maclennan : > 2012/8/10 Bartosz Taudul : >> I just thought about one funny thing. > > This is neither a game of mutual blackmail nor a cold war. Noone said it was. > > In the case you linked to there was a threat, but the person in > question is still on the lists and has RW. Yes,

Re: w32codec updated

2012-08-08 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 8 sierpnia 2012 12:23 użytkownik Bartosz Taudul napisał: > 2012/8/8 Piotr Budny : >>> > Ponieważ Bartek cały czas jest żywotnie zainteresowany rozwojem >>> > dystrybucji i aktywnie przyczynia się do wprowadzania zmian, proponuję >>> > >>> > Z mojej strony +1. >>> >>> +1 >> >> +1 > > Bartek,

Re: RM candidates

2012-06-15 Thread Bartosz Świątek
On 15 cze 2012, at 21:38, "Paweł Sikora" wrote: > On Friday 15 of June 2012 17:46:45 Mariusz Mazur wrote: >> PLD Th is lacking a Release Manager (arekm stepped down recently) and due to >> recent regulation changes, a new one must get approved by a CDG vote. >> >> If you're interested in the posi

Postfix 2.9.3

2012-06-06 Thread Bartosz Świątek
Witam, w załączniku patch na Postfiksa 2.9.3. Proszę o komit. Pozdrawiam, b -- "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can coast for a long time. A LONG time." -Guy Kawasaki postfix.spec.patch Description: Binary data ___

Re: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla

2012-06-01 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/6/1 Artur Wroblewski : > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Bartosz Świątek wrote: >> 2012/5/31 Przemo Firszt : >>> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:54 +0200, Bartosz Świątek wrote: >>>> 2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt : >>>> > The patch not finished (ne

Re: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla

2012-05-31 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/5/31 Przemo Firszt : > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:54 +0200, Bartosz Świątek wrote: >> 2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt : >> > The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the >> > vanilla kernel. >> >> So? What should be done with it now? &g

Re: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0

2012-05-30 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt : > > -- > Przemo Firszt -- "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can coast for a long time. A LONG time." -Guy Kawasaki ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.

Re: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla

2012-05-30 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt : > The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the > vanilla kernel. So? What should be done with it now? Oh wait! I know! You should finish the patch, start your mails with a 'Hallo' and say nicely what you expect from the developers. Easy, right?

Re: packages: python/python-lib64.patch, python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...

2012-05-11 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/5/11 Bartosz Taudul : > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mateusz Korniak > wrote: >> Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost >> of little extra disk space. > Are we having this idiotic argument again? Do we package debuginfo > with compiled programs, or

Re: packages: python/python-lib64.patch, python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...

2012-05-11 Thread Bartosz Świątek
2012/5/11 Paweł Gołaszewski : > On Fri, 11 May 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: >> > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch? >> >> It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong >> opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead of >> 10MB

packages: frogatto/frogatto.spec, frogatto/frogatto-no_fbo_assert.patch (NE...

2012-05-03 Thread Bartosz Świątek
+- ASSERT_EQ(status, EXT_MACRO(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE)); ++//ASSERT_EQ(status, EXT_MACRO(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE)); :) Are you serious? Is this seriously your patch? Do you even know what assert_eq(a,b) does? Since when do we remove bug checking in programs and call it fixes or hacks?!

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-21 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 13:14 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > 2012/4/21 Bartosz Świątek : > [...] >> "Stable is boring"™. > > well, why you have switched from the Ac and jumped on > the development distro line? you know, Ac was supposed > to be the sta

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-21 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 12:11 użytkownik Bartosz Taudul napisał: > 2012/4/21 Bartosz Świątek : >> It may seem unbelievable to you, but there are people who use >> *uncritical* *programs* for living. How absurd is that! Right? > I am thinking about doing some changes to apache.

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-21 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 11:56 użytkownik Jan Rękorajski napisał: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 23:54:25 +0300, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >> >> > Artur ... I'm still not clear on what you GAIN by using HEAD instead >> > of DEVEL? In spite of the name, isn't HEA

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-21 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 21 kwietnia 2012 11:39 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Pala wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 22:07:14 +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote: >> I really really am confused now. You're pretending your side of the story is how it's always be

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 22:26 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >>> well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with >>> appropriate >>> branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain >>>

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 21:28 użytkownik Andrzej Zawadzki napisał: > On 20.04.2012 20:57, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >>> >>> well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with >>> appropriate >>> branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain >>> that, >>>

Re: th stable (Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins)

2012-04-20 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 20:57 użytkownik Caleb Maclennan napisał: >> well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with >> appropriate >> branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain >> that, >> which I believe is full time job and lack of resources

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 01:03 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >> 2012/4/19 Artur Wroblewski : >>> hi, >>> >>> i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. >>> >>> any argument against? >>> >>> btw. we have some quite old gi

Re: gimp 2.8.0 rc1, gimp plugins

2012-04-19 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 19 kwietnia 2012 21:32 użytkownik Artur Wroblewski napisał: > hi, > > i would like to move gimp 2.8.0 rc1 from DEVEL to HEAD. > > any argument against? Yes. New gegl and babl break API/ABI compatibility with earlier versions. Gimp 2.8 RC1 needs them. Also as statet on gimp.org, they need t

Re: DISK FULL

2012-04-08 Thread Bartosz Świątek
Get a life. Sent from my iPhone On 8 kwi 2012, at 13:36, "Elan Ruusamäe" wrote: > making free space is not an option, something just eats it up! > > 14:35:03 root[load: 8.53]@ep09-pld ~/tmp# df . > Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda4 xfs80G 80G 14M 100

Re: ftp move is comming

2012-03-28 Thread Bartosz Świątek
W dniu 27 marca 2012 08:34 użytkownik Jacek Konieczny napisał: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: >> ftp move is comming soon, todo list: >> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready.txt > >> error: browser-plugin-java-icedtea-web-1.2-1: req >> icedtea-web-j