On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with
2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld
On Thursday 10 April 2008 00:28, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> :)Anyway can anyone look at this logs?
---
Loading console font and map...[ BUSY
]locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 00:28, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Who was making those floppies? Maybe there is some possibility to
> upgrade there rpm and/or poldek to make it working.
hawk did. and the biggest problem was that the data does not fit to disk.
upgrading disks, would mean that disks should u
Thank you guys for discussion. I don't agree with some points but such
response means PLD is still alive :-)
This makes me remember the gold PLD rule: SOD#1 :)
Anyway can anyone look at this logs?
Who was making those floppies? Maybe there is some possibility to
upgrade there rpm and/or poldek t
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
> >>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
> >>> was rele
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Adam Golebiowski pisze:
> > As above - it's all about new features, like new hardware, powertop,
> > vmsplice exploit support... I do not need powertop on my server, but
> > would like to play a bit with it on my laptop. And no, I do not want
> > (
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:44, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
> >>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
> >>> wa
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:37, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Adam Golebiowski pisze:
> > As above - it's all about new features, like new hardware, powertop,
> > vmsplice exploit support... I do not need powertop on my server, but
> > would like to play a bit with it on my laptop. And no, I do not want
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:18, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Jakub Bogusz pisze:
> >> What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel??
> >> Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help
> >> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features?
> >
> > U
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Adam Golebiowski wrote:
> Hardware support. It already happened once or twice to me, when I had to
> use kernel newer than 2.6.16 as my NIC wasn't supported - later I discoverd
> r8168.spec which would help me as well, but you see the point.
which does not seem to work
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with
> >>> 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at
> >>> least thr
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:11:59PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > and easiest way to fix security issues is upgrade software, to catch up the
> > patch from upstream. i haven't noticed active security team to patch and
> > backport changes to old versions in pld. we don't have such developer pow
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:14, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Tomasz Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox
>
> >> > no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa'
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features?
works on new hardware.
I have at least two machines which doesn't work on 2.6.16.
On 2.6.22 - works fine without big problems. (still are small problems
like non w
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with
> >>> 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at
>
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
> > need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
> > was released. and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would
> > mean changing th
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:56, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> >> Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox
> >
> > no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa' (answer to
> > question "what was installed afterall")
>
> Ok I'll prepare detailed report but I don't like your a
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 21:03:11 +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> upgrade kernel for servers - more useless
And problematic, e.g. xtables/nftables transition issues.
--
Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading
> > packages from ac-updates afterall?
>
> updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference
> between ac/ti/th when you can update everything?? Mayb
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> what did issue that warning?
Wasn't there a typo within kbd (-utf8 instead of -iutf8)?
--
http://www.agmk.net/ - hosting, strony www, opieka informatyczna
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lis
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >> 5. Not mentioning the fact that not everything in AC is signed and
> >> default config demands signed packages
> >
> > don't enable such trees then. signed in ac are 'ac' and 'ac-updates'
> > and 'ac-supported' trees only.
>
> Yes I mean o
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with
> > 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at
> > least three years old kernel. upstream is near 2.6.25 already. and th/ti
> > do have 2.6.22
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >> 3. after reboot:
> >> locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
> >> locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or
> >> directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >> 2. Upgrade AC, it fails when upgrading rpm with the message of missing
> >> lzma, when manully install the lzma package it installs but fails on
> >> rebuilding rpm database.
> >
> > upgrade to ac from what?
>
> Upgrade AC to AC+updates wi
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >> 1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the
> >> SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when
> >> manually installed - it works
> >
> > recommended way of installing is chroot install, and the
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 20:33, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Translated:
>
> I've tried to check what hurts AC:
> 1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the
> SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when
> manually installed - it works
recommended way of i
Translated:
I've tried to check what hurts AC:
1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the
SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when
manually installed - it works
2. Upgrade AC, it fails when upgrading rpm with the message of missing
lzma, when
27 matches
Mail list logo
