On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
Thanks for response!
If you want fglrx then you can't upgrade xserver. ATI is very slow when
dealing with new xservers.
So you have two options, wait for ATI to release supported version or try
to
use -ati driver.
And this driver has 3D
:
secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE - 1.1) (NEW)
[...]
I don't find such way useful:
- when I download package by builder, I don't have ANY idea, that there
even is any TODO
- TODO is not available in .src.rpm
I second that. Blues please stop making this mess.
--
Jan Rekorajski
; there was conflict with libgssapi-devel, libgssglue
predecessor, but now nothing conflicts:
I know no files conflict but this conflict is more of a You don't want
this library, you really don't, or you will get problems, big ones.
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD
usage to rc-scripts and
created inconsistency in running daemons? Sorry, but default is
RC_LOGGING=yes and I really don't have the time to implement a workaround.
If you think initlog should die, then go ahead and kill it. Everyone
will be happy.
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS
if something is broken
well, it builds, it starts and i am able to connect to a database... enjoy
Glad to see it works, as I will have to upgrade my server during summer :)
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T
?
No idea ;) And you missed %{texmfdist}/source/jadetex/base/*
That's why I'm trying to do a test build for a few days :/
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
}
%_sourcedir %{_specdir}
the %{name} seems to work too:
It won't work in case of _alt_kernel and all other packages that have
%{name} inconsistent with package name.
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote:
[go...@fs ~/rpm/packages/xorg-driver-video-intel]$ cvs ci
xorg-driver-video-intel.spec
cvs [server aborted]: commit requires write access to the repository
cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsUXYEvG
Old ACL, removed.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski
...@cvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot co packages
ctrl+c after it starts fetching
Or:
cd ~/rpm
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:c...@cvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot co packages/builder
cd packages
./builder -bb alien
(or your favorite build mode/spec)
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD
$ ../builder -bp rrdtool
builder: SMP make flags are set to -j16
../builder[2505]: cd: /home/glen/rpm/packages - No such file or directory
[...]
I don't know how it ever worked for you (fancy .rpmmacros?).
Feel free to make it work again, as I can't fully grasp what you're
trying to achieve.
--
Jan
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 18:05:53 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
how do i get list of all existing .spec files? i'm used to search
packages that way.
Currently only by checking out whole packages/ tree
-drivers-mysql and b) alter the
config? Or maybe something else?
banner and S:libdbi-drivers-mysql as it was the default.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
'. What's wrong here?
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel
) when geninitrd
is run.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Friday 20 March 2009 16:47:01 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Sunday 27 April 2008 12:15:29 Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
how about putting programs that were compiled to be put to initrd into
own dir instead
for binaries nothing %config is placed there.
One more thing, what package should provide that dir?
I'm inclined towards filesystem, because one may want to use the
programs but do not want to have geninitrd around (initramfs-tools for
example).
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS
. Fix on ppc, cause busybox requires uClibc = 0.9.30 :(
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 12:20:50 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/336742
plz somebody answer on comment #1
That fix won't do anything.
You need to fix the %post
.
Janek
PS pardon my english, it's late and I have sleep shortages ;)
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
is only half functional.
We don't have cdrom, dialout and tape groups. If you're so intent
on upgrading udev, then upgrade our setup, too.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
in 2.6.28.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
[pndir]th-test...
Loading [pndir]th-test...
19644 packages read
error: fam-libs: no such package
error: gamin-libs: no such package
gamin obsoletes gamin-libs and the whole fam.
The gamin/gamin-libs split was unnecessary and crippling, so I removed it.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL
really? why?
Don't ask me, I just build it ;)
5.0 isn't new enough?
I had 5.1.23 installed and compilation failed with lots of errors,
update to 5.1.29 fixed it.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T
we
have one centric source for certificates)
Good luck. Personally I will just wait for when nss won't be a piece of
crap and starts supporting CA bundles.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2008 18:31:48 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
and why openssl-tools is required?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pld/SPECS $ rpm -qf /etc/openssl
openssl-tools-0.9.7m-1.i686
I don't care for AC. iow
the dir, it makes no difference for me, I even considered this
myself when I was packaging this. Just, please, stick with ca-certificates.crt
file name.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD
(yassl?), lftp
prefers
gnutls, pidgin can't work with openssl with msn, so gnutls should be used
there.
Yeah, like I said in other post, feel free to change that dir.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T
:(
http://rpm5.org/cvs/tktview?tn=38_submit=Show really got fixed?
I don't think so. The only that got fixed was
http://rpm5.org/cvs/tktview?tn=39_submit=Show
I just removed duplicate URLs in spec.
BTW Why aren't we using rpm 5.1.x in Th?
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY
for the init binary).
So what? If it:
Requires: upstart
And that will silently screw someone, and is not acceptable.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jan Rekorajski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Xorg devs prefer if we let Xorg pick the vte. It worked for you
because back then Xorg did not do this and gdm forced vte9
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Still, the recommended way to start gdm is using upstart or inittab as
xorg needs to be started after all ttys are up. We can work around
that for years but we're the only distro to run gdm this way
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2008 16:34:31 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
mysqladmin -u mysql -S $MYSQL_SOCKET password 'password'
mysqladmin -h $hostname -u mysql -S $MYSQL_SOCKET password
'password'
this is pointless too, as it's the same user
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2008 12:31:51 Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2008 01:50, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Sun Oct 12 22:50:46 2008 GMT
Module: SOURCES
SUPER priv to this user is a no-no.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
libfoo-doc?
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en
will.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
time to investigate as everything seems to
work despite those.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
is consistent.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Can anyone tell me what is the original util-vserver-vrpm.patch from
the spec trying to achieve? Other than making vrpm and vpoldek die of
course.
What's so hard in doing `cvs log util-vserver-vrpm.patch`?
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL
worked till now.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
___
pld-devel-en
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Jan Rekorajski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [14-05-2007 00:55]:
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [13-05-2007 23:09]:
On 5/13/07, Radoslaw Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL
experienced in
CVS internals will have to glue it into CVS. BTW. such a script will
require rpm-build package on the server.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Piotr Budny wrote:
Dnia niedziela, 13 maja 2007, Jan Rekorajski napisał:
EN:
[...]
would SVN repo look like - a ~milion directories, and GIT just doesn't
Wouldn't CVS have milion dirs too?
Just ~12000, remember that SVN creates a directory for every tag/branch
To: proper language list
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote:
Jan Rekorajski wrote:
Any thoughts? Comments?
Yup. It was discussed to death. It doesn't fit to PLD.
It was always discussed in context of switching to SVN, never by itself.
And the oposition was against a screwed tag
(symlinks to all SPEC files
currently checked out) - for these rare times when you need to grep
through the whole repo and mass-commit your changes.
My script does just this.
One interesting thing that came out is ~900 files in SOURCES that do not
belong to any package...
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Jan Rekorajski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [13-05-2007 20:20]:
We all know that CVS sucks, less for some (me included) and more for
All version control systems suck. CVS just sucks least for this kind of
repository.
others. But, if we want
to what package?
And those were just everyday, common issues.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Jan Rekorajski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [14-05-2007 00:41]:
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Jan Rekorajski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [13-05-2007 20:20]:
[...]
others. But, if we want to switch to anything else, we have to change
): Dia - program do tworzenia diagram^Bw
...as that is utf8.
Can you try latest mc from Th (2007-03-09-18)?. It looks like something
improved in this snapshot.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS
by
having mismatched libs and apps.
do you know how hard is later merge branches due large version mismatches
between branches?
Sorry, life sucks but otherwise you can end up with broken packages in
distro.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:58:06 you wrote:
[...cut...]
-Requires: gnome-vfs2 = 2.16.2
-Requires: libgnomeui = 2.16.1
+Requires
into kernel to be able
to boot from ext2 rootfs
[...]
What's the point if all block device drivers are compiled as modules?
You _still_ need initrd.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
anyone have clue?
I already removed that play with regxpcom from scripts for acreread in
flash.
IMO it's not needed, and if someone think it is then do it properly
(LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/mozilla first) and do it for _all_ gecko
browsers (why mozilla
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:48:27PM +0200, radek wrote:
Author: radekDate: Sun May 21 10:48:27 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- version 1.2.13
- commented out BR/R: javamail,
Are there any objections to:
cp metapackage-gnome.spec,v gnome.spec,v
cp metapackage-gnustep.spec,v gnustep.spec,v
?
Janek
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC |
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:03:32PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2006/05/16/_long/3852.html
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something
Great.
Maybe we could rebuild openoffice 1
http://hedera.linuxnews.pl/_news/2006/05/16/_long/3852.html
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
hi
i made patch to truncate changelog at build time [1].
the question is how many entries to limit the truncation, and should the
truncation setting be different for Ac and Th?
At least 3 months worth, preferably half a year.
You can't just cut it
There is a serious security issue with all versions of linux-vserver.
All versions 2.0 and above are vulnerable.
Description:
Setting context capability (ccapabilities) gives rights to use
operations allowed by this capability to all users inside vserver.
All users of kernel-vserver are urged to
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Marcin Król wrote:
Due to planned CVS branching Ac builder access will be restricted to
AC-branch on april 6th. If something should be sent to builders before
branching will occur, let me know.
horde-mnemo should be upgraded, but I can't connect to
(ftp|www).horde.org to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
--- Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grrr
udev-079-2.amd64
cmon, is adding trigger really so hard?
[cut]
take it easy. if you need a feature implement it. Don't expect from
people to do
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
libtasn1.spec gnutls.spec:AC-branch
(security fixes)
poszlo
Janek
--
Jan Rękorajski| ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
bagginsatmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC |
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:15 +0100, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Wed Jan 18 18:15:12 2006 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- release 5
- don't build plugin for archaic evolution
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
AC is now frozen (but there are exceptions - things that are in ready now
will
probably end in main _if and only if_ there is requirement for some of them;
there one more kernel 2.6.14.6 rebuild to fix kernel-module-build; the other
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:16:52PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
There left only a few things todo in dependencies area (and much more in
other
areas)
bd: libstdc++32-3.3.6-3: req libc.so.6 not found
- tons of these due to multilib so
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
bd: ocaml-netclient-devel-0.91.1-3: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1
version mismatch
bd: ocaml-pxp-devel-1.1.6-4: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1 version
mismatch
bd: ocaml-xmlrpc-devel-0.1.0-6: req ocaml-net-netstring-devel = 1.1
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
In glibc-2.3.6 (Ac) /usr/include/sys/quota.h::struct dqblk has curspace
member, while glibc-2.3.90 (Th) has curblocks.
What do we do with these? Branch it now or wait till Ac gets released?
AC-branch is your friend.
Or better apply some checks
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 00:48, baggins wrote:
Author: baggins Date: Thu Oct 6 21:48:17 2005 GMT
Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
Log message:
- added apache config and pre/post scripts
- simplify use
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
- it makes it impossible to revert by `cvs up -j` (you lose changelog
entries)
Is it really that important? After 6 years of work with our CVS I can't
remember needing it.
Then how
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
let's start new war...
what about moving repo to svn?
Any reasons? SVN sucks a big one.
svn diff without performing
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On Thursday 21 July 2005 20:03, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Dnia 21-07-2005, czw o godzinie 18:46 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a):
so... mysql (or anything that uses %userremove/%groupremove) must depend
on rpm package?
what about
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
My proposal is for us to stop being so uber-smart and just revert to
defaults. Kill all those s/xterm/xterm-color/ and s/xterm/we-know-better/
patches and just stick to TERM=xterm
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:59:28 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
I agree, we shall do it the _common_ way.
However Debian/RH/FC has ^H for xterm-color, so following above rule you
should revert ncurses-xterm-color-new.patch, don't you
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Pawe Sakowski wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:55 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
HEAD (still) differs from AC-branch for rpm
Invoked after the merge, before further changes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] BUILD]$ cd ~/PLD/SPECS/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ cvs diff -rHEAD
76 matches
Mail list logo
