Looks like OCAML_INSTALL_DIR should be set to the output of "ocaml
-where". This will allow for the differences in Debian and Fedora (and
other) install locations.
Debian guidelines:
1.3.2. OCaml Location
The root of all installed OCaml libraries is the OCaml standard
library directory, w
On 2008-09-02 21:28-0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -- WARNING: DSSSL Style Sheet DTD not found
> -- WARNING: DocBook HTML Stylesheet not found
> -- WARNING: DocBook Print Stylesheet not found
> -- WARNING: DocBook DTD not found
> -- WARNING: Not building print documentation - dtd files / style sh
On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Attached is a zip file that more closely emulates the PLPlot
>> situation, with plmap written in C but with the callback, mapform19,
>> written in Ada. Could a few of you test it to see if it runs or
>> crashes on your machines? Either way
-- WARNING: DSSSL Style Sheet DTD not found
-- WARNING: DocBook HTML Stylesheet not found
-- WARNING: DocBook Print Stylesheet not found
-- WARNING: DocBook DTD not found
-- WARNING: Not building print documentation - dtd files / style sheets
are missing
-- WARNING: Not building html documentation
> Attached is a zip file that more closely emulates the PLPlot
> situation, with plmap written in C but with the callback, mapform19,
> written in Ada. Could a few of you test it to see if it runs or
> crashes on your machines? Either way, I'd like to report back to the
> geniuses at comp.lang.ada
Hello Alan,
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:18 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I think we should deal properly with leap seconds because of the
> problem you
> mentioned above and also the problem that our fundamental time
> variable
> would then have a strange relationship with externally defined time
> s
On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:03:25AM -0700, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 1, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 2008-09-01 14:58-0700 Jerry wrote:
>>>
Andrew,
Does the Ada example, with xmin hardcoded to 1_133_395_200.0,
>>>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:03:25AM -0700, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > On 2008-09-01 14:58-0700 Jerry wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >> Does the Ada example, with xmin hardcoded to 1_133_395_200.0,
> >> generate the same Postscript as the C example?
> >
On 2008-09-02 13:18+0100 Schwartz, Steven J wrote:
> We don't deal with leap seconds. As long as we use our own routines to get
from broken-down time to epoch time and back, the result is clean and
consistent, although this means we only allow a minute to have 60 seconds.
Thus a time series that a
Andrew/Alan,
Thanks for picking up this thread. I think your remarks are all sensible.
We have code and experience in going back and forth from broken-down time to
time since an epoch and I think we should be able to bundle that and supply it
as pltimeutc and its inverse. Give me some time to
On Sep 1, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-09-01 14:58-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Does the Ada example, with xmin hardcoded to 1_133_395_200.0,
>> generate the same Postscript as the C example?
>
> The current Ada example 29 code has
>
> xmin := 1133395200.0;
>
> (no und
Steve, Alan,
I entirely agree that the only sane, cross-platform and cross-language
way of dealing with the timegm (and possible gmtime) problem is to add our
own implementation. This is relatively straightfoward and I can see no
reason not to. The bigger question is whether we carry on using
s
12 matches
Mail list logo
