On 2014-01-21 01:44-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
My personal development goal for this release is to get a clean
comprehensive test of epa_build results both on Linux and MinGW/MSYS.
So far (aside from the known propagation issues with OCaml) the
results of a somewhat limited version of the test
Hi Hǎiliàng:
Thanks very much for implementing an initial proof of concept of my
idea.
On 2014-01-22 15:40+0800 Hailiang Wang wrote:
It takes not much effort to build a comparison program because the
parser for api.xml is ready-made.
I put the tool under my github reop here
Hi Hǎiliàng:
Could you try the latest svn trunk version (revision 12954) with your
checker? For most cases I just modified api.xml, but in a few cases
the documented name of the parameters made more sense than the name
used in plplot.h and the code in src/*.c so I changed the source
code
Hi Alan,
Here are results from revision 12954:
c_plbtime is not documented.
c_plconfigtime is not documented.
c_plctime is not documented.
c_plgcmap1_range is not documented.
c_plgdrawmode is not documented.
c_plot3dcl is not documented.
c_plscmap1_range is not documented.
c_plsdrawmode is not
On 2014-01-23 09:57+0800 Hailiang Wang wrote:
Hi Alan,
Here are results from revision 12954:
c_plbtime is not documented.
c_plconfigtime is not documented.
c_plctime is not documented.
c_plgcmap1_range is not documented.
c_plgdrawmode is not documented.
c_plot3dcl is not documented.
Yes, you're right. Here is the complete result:
c_plbtime is not documented.
c_plconfigtime is not documented.
c_plctime is not documented.
c_plgcmap1_range is not documented.
c_plgdrawmode is not documented.
c_plot3dcl is not documented.
c_plscmap1_range is not documented.
c_plsdrawmode is not
